Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors
- Author
- MCCONNACK, Valerie A1 ; HIGHNAM, Ralph2 ; PERRY, Nicholas3 ; DOS SANTOS SILVA, Isabel1
[1] Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
[2] Highnam Associates Limited, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Breast Assessment Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom - Source
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2007, Vol 16, Num 6, pp 1148-1154, 7 p ; ref : 17 ref
- ISSN
- 1055-9965
- Scientific domain
- Medical oncology; Hygiene and public health, epidemiology, occupational medicine
- Publisher
- American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Adulte Cancérologie Densité Epidémiologie Etude comparative Facteur risque Femelle Fiabilité Mammographie Méthode mesure Cancer du sein Royaume Uni Glande mammaire pathologie Homme Radiodiagnostic Santé publique Tumeur maligne Europe
- Keyword (en)
- Adult Cancerology Density Epidemiology Comparative study Risk factor Female Reliability Mammography Measurement method Breast cancer United Kingdom Mammary gland diseases Human Radiodiagnosis Public health Malignant tumor Europe
- Keyword (es)
- Adulto Cancerología Densidad Epidemiología Estudio comparativo Factor riesgo Hembra Fiabilidad Mastografía Método medida Cáncer de pecho Reino Unido Glándula mamaria patología Hombre Radiodiagnóstico Salud pública Tumor maligno Europa
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B24 Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) / 002B24A Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry / 002B24A08 Genital system. Mammary gland
- Discipline
- Scanning and diagnostic techniques Tumours
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 18878872
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:29:\"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:44:\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:31:\"Cancer epidemiol. biomark. prev\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"16\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"6\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1148\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1154\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1055-9965\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"MCCONNACK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:9:\"Valerie A\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:14:\"HIGHNAM, Ralph\";i:1;s:15:\"PERRY, Nicholas\";i:2;s:24:\"DOS SANTOS SILVA, Isabel\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:40:\"American Association for Cancer Research\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:29:\"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:44:\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:31:\"Cancer epidemiol. biomark. prev\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"16\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"6\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1148\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1154\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1055-9965\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"MCCONNACK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:9:\"Valerie A\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:14:\"HIGHNAM, Ralph\";i:1;s:15:\"PERRY, Nicholas\";i:2;s:24:\"DOS SANTOS SILVA, Isabel\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:40:\"American Association for Cancer Research\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:29:\"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:29:\"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:44:\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:31:\"Cancer epidemiol. biomark. prev\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"16\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"6\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1148\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1154\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1055-9965\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"MCCONNACK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:9:\"Valerie A\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:14:\"HIGHNAM, Ralph\";i:1;s:15:\"PERRY, Nicholas\";i:2;s:24:\"DOS SANTOS SILVA, Isabel\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:40:\"American Association for Cancer Research\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:29:\"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:44:\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:31:\"Cancer epidemiol. biomark. prev\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"16\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"6\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1148\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1154\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1055-9965\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"MCCONNACK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:9:\"Valerie A\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:14:\"HIGHNAM, Ralph\";i:1;s:15:\"PERRY, Nicholas\";i:2;s:24:\"DOS SANTOS SILVA, Isabel\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:142:\"Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement : Intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:40:\"American Association for Cancer Research\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
