The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory
- Author
- MARTIN, Emily1
[1] Department of Anthropology, New York University, 25 Waverly Place, New York, New York 10003, United States - Conference title
- Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine
- Conference name
- Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine (Teresópolis 2011-10-28)
- Author (monograph)
- TAUSSIC, Karen Sue (Editor)1 ; HOEYER, Klaus (Editor)2
[1] Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota 395 Hubert H. Humphrey Center, 301, 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
[2] Department of Public Health at the University of Copenhagen,Øster Farimagsgade 5, Room 10.0.09, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark - Source
Current anthropology. 2013, Vol 54 ; S149-S158 ; SUP7 ; ref : 3/4 p
- ISSN
- 0011-3204
- Scientific domain
- Biological and physical anthropology; Archeology; Cognition
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Conference Paper
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Anthropologie
- Keyword (en)
- Anthropology
- Keyword (es)
- Antropología
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B29 Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology / 002B29A Anthropology. Demography
- Discipline
- Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 28112966
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1086/670388 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/670388
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:14:\"10.1086\/670388\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:20:\"Current anthropology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Curr. anthropol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2013\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"54\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:9:\"S149-S158\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0011-3204\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"MARTIN\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:5:\"Emily\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:0:{}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:4:\"SUP7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:115:\"Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:14:\"10.1086\/670388\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:20:\"Current anthropology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Curr. anthropol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2013\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"54\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:9:\"S149-S158\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0011-3204\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"MARTIN\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:5:\"Emily\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:0:{}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:4:\"SUP7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:115:\"Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:14:\"10.1086\/670388\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:14:\"10.1086\/670388\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:20:\"Current anthropology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Curr. anthropol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2013\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"54\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:9:\"S149-S158\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0011-3204\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"MARTIN\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:5:\"Emily\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:0:{}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:4:\"SUP7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:115:\"Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:14:\"10.1086\/670388\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:20:\"Current anthropology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Curr. anthropol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2013\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"54\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:9:\"S149-S158\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0011-3204\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"MARTIN\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:5:\"Emily\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:0:{}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:4:\"SUP7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:115:\"Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:14:\"10.1086\/670388\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:20:\"Current anthropology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Curr. anthropol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2013\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"54\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:9:\"S149-S158\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0011-3204\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"MARTIN\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:5:\"Emily\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:0:{}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:10:\"proceeding\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:4:\"SUP7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:115:\"Wenner-Gren Symposium Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the anthropological Object in Contemporary Biomedicine\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:63:\"The Potentiality of Ethnography and the Limits of Affect Theory\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
