Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil
- Author
- SCANLON, B. R1 ; REEDY, R. C1 ; NICOT, J.-P1
[1] Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758, United States - Source
Environmental science & technology. 2014, Vol 48, Num 20, pp 12386-12393, 8 p ; ref : 26 ref
- CODEN
- ESTHAG
- ISSN
- 0013-936X
- Scientific domain
- Biotechnology; Ecology; Energy; Environment; Pollution
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Consommation eau Etude cas Etude comparative Fracturation hydraulique Gaz naturel Huile schiste Pétrole Gaz de schiste Ressource non conventionnelle Etats-Unis Amérique du Nord Amérique
- Keyword (en)
- Water consumption Case study Comparative study Hydraulic fracturing Natural gas Shale oil Petroleum Shale gas Unconventional resource United States North America America
- Keyword (es)
- Consumo agua Estudio caso Estudio comparativo Fracturación hidraúlica Gas natural Aceite esquisto Petróleo Estados Unidos America del norte America
- Classification
- Pascal
- 001 Exact sciences and technology / 001D Applied sciences / 001D06 Energy / 001D06B Fuels / 001D06B02 Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products / 001D06B02B Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands / 001D06B02B5 Crude oil, natural gas, oil shales producing equipements and methods / 001D06B02B5E Gas well production
- Pascal
- 001 Exact sciences and technology / 001D Applied sciences / 001D06 Energy / 001D06B Fuels / 001D06B02 Crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products / 001D06B02B Prospecting and production of crude oil, natural gas, oil shales and tar sands / 001D06B02B5 Crude oil, natural gas, oil shales producing equipements and methods / 001D06B02B5G Enhanced oil recovery methods
- Discipline
- Energy
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 28992692
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1021/es502506v 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502506v
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:17:\"10.1021\/es502506v\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:34:\"Environmental science & technology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:21:\"Environ. sci. technol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2014\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"48\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"20\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:5:\"12386\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:5:\"12393\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0013-936X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"SCANLON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"B. R\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:11:\"REEDY, R. C\";i:1;s:11:\"NICOT, J.-P\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ESTHAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:14:\"Washington, DC\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:25:\"American Chemical Society\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:17:\"10.1021\/es502506v\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:34:\"Environmental science & technology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:21:\"Environ. sci. technol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2014\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"48\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"20\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:5:\"12386\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:5:\"12393\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0013-936X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"SCANLON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"B. R\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:11:\"REEDY, R. C\";i:1;s:11:\"NICOT, J.-P\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ESTHAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:14:\"Washington, DC\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:25:\"American Chemical Society\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:17:\"10.1021\/es502506v\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:17:\"10.1021\/es502506v\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:34:\"Environmental science & technology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:21:\"Environ. sci. technol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2014\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"48\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"20\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:5:\"12386\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:5:\"12393\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0013-936X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"SCANLON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"B. R\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:11:\"REEDY, R. C\";i:1;s:11:\"NICOT, J.-P\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ESTHAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:14:\"Washington, DC\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:25:\"American Chemical Society\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:17:\"10.1021\/es502506v\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:34:\"Environmental science & technology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:21:\"Environ. sci. technol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2014\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"48\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"20\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:5:\"12386\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:5:\"12393\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0013-936X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"SCANLON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"B. R\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:11:\"REEDY, R. C\";i:1;s:11:\"NICOT, J.-P\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ESTHAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:14:\"Washington, DC\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:25:\"American Chemical Society\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:17:\"10.1021\/es502506v\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:34:\"Environmental science & technology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:21:\"Environ. sci. technol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2014\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"48\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"20\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:5:\"12386\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:5:\"12393\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0013-936X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"SCANLON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"B. R\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:11:\"REEDY, R. C\";i:1;s:11:\"NICOT, J.-P\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ESTHAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"Comparison of Water Use for Hydraulic Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas versus Conventional Oil\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:14:\"Washington, DC\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:25:\"American Chemical Society\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
