TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN
- Other title
- TESTS DE SCREENING TUBERCULINIQUES EN PRATIQUE. ETUDES COMPARATIVES OUVERTES DU TINE-TEST ET DU MONOTEST OPPOSES AU MANTOUX AU 1/1000 CHEZ 119 MALADIES AMBULANTS (fr)
- Author
- HERZOG C; BIRKHAEUSER MH
MED. UNIV.-POLIKLIN./BASEL/CHE - Source
- SCHWEIZ. MED. WOCHENSCHR.; ISSN 0036-7672; CHE; DA. 1980; VOL. 110; NO 48; PP. 1817-1821; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 20 REF.
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- German
- Keyword (fr)
- TEST CUTANE TUBERCULINE ETUDE COMPARATIVE TECHNIQUE VOIE PERCUTANEE VOIE INTRADERMIQUE TUBERCULINE PPD INTERPRETATION TEST HISTOGRAMME EXPLORATION HYPERSENSIBILITE RETARDEE DEPISTAGE HOMME METHODE IMMUNOLOGIQUE VOIE ADMINISTRATION INTRADERMOREACTION TEST TRANSCUTANE TUBERCULINE BRUTE MICROBIOLOGIE
- Keyword (en)
- SKIN TEST TUBERCULIN COMPARATIVE STUDY TECHNIQUE PERCUTANEOUS ROUTE INTRADERMALLY ADMINISTRATION TUBERCULIN PPD TEST INTERPRETATION HISTOGRAMS EXPLORATION DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY SCREENING HUMAN IMMUNOLOGICAL METHOD ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION INTRADERMAL REACTION MICROBIOLOGY
- Keyword (es)
- MICROBIOLOGIA
- Classification
- Discipline
- Infectious pathology
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- PASCAL8110101662
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Install on your browser
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1980\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"HERZOG\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"C\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:14:\"BIRKHAEUSER MH\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1980\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"HERZOG\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"C\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:14:\"BIRKHAEUSER MH\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1980\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"HERZOG\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"C\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:14:\"BIRKHAEUSER MH\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1980\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"HERZOG\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"C\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:14:\"BIRKHAEUSER MH\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1980\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:6:\"HERZOG\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"C\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:14:\"BIRKHAEUSER MH\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:148:\"TUBERKULIN-SCREENINGTESTS IN DER PRAXIS. OFFENE VERGLEICHSUNTERSUCHUNG VON TINE-TEST UND MONOTEST VERSUS MANTOOX 1:1000 BEI 119 AMBULANTEN PATIENTEN\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
