DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT IN COACHING TENNIS SKILLSBUZAS HP; AYLLON T.1981; BEHAV. MODIF.; ISSN 0145-4455; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 372-385; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT OF OTHER BEHAVIOR: A PREFERRED RESPONSE ELIMINATION PROCEDUREHOMER AL; PETERSON L.1980; BEHAV. THER.; ISSN 0005-7894; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 449-471; BIBL. 5 P.Article

EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT AS A FUNCTION OF PAST REINFORCEMENT AND PRESENT SCHEDULECHAPPELL LR; LEIBOWITZ JM.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 2; PP. 647-659; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THE USE OF VISUAL ORIENTATION FEDDBACK TO FACILITATE ATTENTION AND TASK PERFORMANCEJACKSON GM.1979; MENTAL RETARDAT.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 17; NO 6; PP. 281-284; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A CASE REPORT ON THE USE OF DRO IN THE TREATMENT OF SMOKING.BARTON ES; BARTON JL.1978; ADDICT. BEHAV.; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 1; PP. 1-4; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CHOICE AND BEHAVIORAL PATTERNINGSHIMP CP.1982; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; NO 2; PP. 157-169; BIBL. 2 P.Article

DISCRETE-TRIAL CHOICE IN PIGEON EFFECTS OF REINFORCER MAGNITUDEYOUNG JS.1981; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 23-29; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF HIPPOCAMPECTOMY IN AN INCREMENTAL-STEP DRL PARADIGMBOITANO JJ; DOKLA CPJ; MULINSKI P et al.1980; PHYSIOL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 273-278; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF EXTINCTION, DRO 0-SEC, AND DRO 6-SEC IN THE ELIMINATION OF IMITATIVE RESPONSING UNDER DISCRETE-TRIAL PARADIGMS.MARTINEZ SS.1977; J. APPL. BEHAV. ANAL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 315Article

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT AND TASK DIFFICULTY ON PRESCHOOLERS COMPLIANCE WITH TEACHER INSTRUCTIONS.BUCHER B; OKOVITA H.1977; J. EXPER. CHILD PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 226-236; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

MAGNITUDE OF REWARD AND PREFERENCE IN A DELAYED-REWARD SITUATION.CROOKS RC.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1215-1219; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

FABLE MOD: OPERANTLY STRUCTURED FANTASIES AS AN ADJUNCT IN THE MODIFICATION OF FIRE-SETTING BEHAVIOR.STAWAR TL.1976; J. BEHAV. THERAPY EXPER. PSYCHIATRY; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 285-287; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ASSOCIATIVE STRENGHT OF A TONE IN A SUCCESSIVE DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT SITUATION IN ALBINO RATS.MISRA SK; SAHOO FM.1976; INDIAN J. PSYCHOL.; INDIA; DA. 1976; VOL. 51; NO 3; PP. 241-250; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PSYCHOPHYSICS OF KEY-PECK DURATION IN THE PIGEONZEILER MD; DAVIS ER; DECASPER AJ et al.1980; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 23-33; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY AND DURABILITY OF RESPONDING EFFECTED BY TWO MODIFIED DRL PROCEDURES WITH HUMANS.BOSTWICK AD.1977; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 225-233; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

DAMAGE TO HIPPOCAMPUS AND HIPPOCAMPAL CONNECTIONS: EFFECTS ON DRL AND SPONTANEOUS ALTERNATION.JOHNSON CT; OLTON DS; GAGE FH III et al.1977; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 91; NO 3; PP. 508-522; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

PRESIGNALED BEHAVIOR AS A PREDICTOR OF SIGNALED DRL PERFORMANCE.MARCUCELLA H; MACDONALL JS; MUNRO I et al.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 335-338; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

RESPONSE ELIMINATION: A COMPARISON OF FOUR PROCEDURES.LOWRY MA; LACHTER GD.1977; LEARNG AND MOTIVAT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 69-76; BIBL. 1 P.Article

STUDIES OF OPERANT AND REFLEXIVE KEY PECKS IN THE PIGEON.SCHWARTZ B.1977; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 27; NO 2; PP. 301-313; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

A DIRECT COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS FOR ELIMINATING A RESPONSE.PACITTI WA; SMITH NF.1977; LEARNG AND MOTIVAT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 229-237; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DIFFERENTIAL OPERANT BEHAVIOR BASED ON TIME OF DAY.HOLLOWAY FA; JACKSON FD.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 94-96; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

FROM HEROIN TO METHADONE-SOCIAL ROLE CHANGES AND REINFORCEMENT DIFFERENTIALS IN RELATION TO OUT COME ON METHADONE. I. THE STUDY OF REINFORCEMENT DIFFERENTIALS.CHEEK FE; HOLSTEIN CN; FULLAM FA et al.1976; INTERNATION. J. ADDICT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 659-679; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

REINFORCEMENT OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN'S RESPONSES TO MUSIC.SCHMIDT DC; FRANKLIN R; EDWARDS JS et al.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 571-577; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

OPERANT CONTROL OF SEIZURE BEHAVIOR: REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF RESEARCHMCRAE S; CUVO AJ.1980; BEHAV. RES. SEV. DEV. DISABIL.; ISSN 0167-6059; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 1; NO 3; PP. 215-248; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

Page / 16