CAN EQUITY THEORY EXPLAIN THE QUALITY AND THE STABILITY OF ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS.LUJANSKY H; MIKULA G.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 101-112; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

COUNTERING INEQUITY WITH INEQUITY: OVER-REWARDING GENEROSITY AND UNDER-REWARDING GREEDGREENBERG J.1982; EUR. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0046-2772; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 181-185; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

HANDLING NEGATIVE INPUTS: ON THE PLAUSIBLE EQUITY FORMULAE.HARRIS RJ.1976; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 194-209; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE RESPONSE TO INJUSTICE: EFFECTS OF VARYING LEVELS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND POSITION OF ADVANTAGE OR DISADVANTAGESTEIL JM.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 239-253; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE EFFECTS OF CONTROL ON PERCEIVED FAIRNESS OF PROCEDURES AND OUTCOMESMUSANTE L; GILBERT MA; THIBAUT J et al.1983; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 223-238; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

EQUITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE.WALSTER E; WALSTER GW.1975; J. SOC. ISSUES; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 21-43; BIBL. 4 P.Article

EQUITY THEORY AND THE ALLOCATION OF REWARDS BETWEEN GROUPSSIK HUNG NG.1981; EUR. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0046-2772; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 439-443; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ANOTHER FOLLY FOR EQUITY THEORYALESSIO JC.1980; SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0147-829X; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 43; NO 3; PP. 336-340; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF FUTURE INTERACTION ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF REWARDS.VON GRUMBKOW J; DEEN E; STEENSMA H et al.1976; EUROP. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; NETHERL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 119-123; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

A TYPOLOGY OF DISENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND AN EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE INTIMACY, REACTIONS TO INEQUITY AND RELATIONAL PROBLEMS PLAY IN STRATEGY SELECTIONCODY MJ.1982; COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS; ISSN 0363-7751; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 49; NO 3; PP. 148-170; BIBL. 53 REF.Article

MULTIDIMENSIONAL INPUT IN EQUITY THEORYFARKAS AJ; ANDERSON NH.1979; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 37; NO 6; PP. 879-896; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

TEST OF EQUITY THEORY BY CONTROLLING FOR COMPARISON CO-WORKERS'EFFORTS.MIDDLEMIST RD; PETERSON RB.1976; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 335-354; BIBL. 1 P.Article

EQUITY AND SEXUAL SATISFACTION IN DATING COUPLESTRAUPMANN J; HATFIELD E; WEXLER P et al.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 33-40; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

STIMULATING EQUITY OF CMHC SERVICES TO NON-WHITES: A FOLLOW-UP BASED ON EXPECTED "REGRESSION"WINDLE C; WU IH.1981; COMMUNITY MENT. HEALTH J.; ISSN 0010-3853; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 306-309; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

FAIRNESS AND PREFERENCEMESSICK DM; SENTIS KP.1979; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 15; NO 4; PP. 418-434; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

CALCULATING EQUITY: ORDINAL AND RATIO CRITERIAMOSCHETTI GJ.1979; SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 172-176; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

EQUITY JUDGMENT: A REVISION OF ARISTOTELIAN VIEWSMELLERS BA.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., GEN.; ISSN 0096-3445; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 111; NO 2; PP. 242-270; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

LONG-RANGE IMPACT OF FAIR SELECTION STANDARDS ON MINORITY EMPLOYMENTLEDVINKA J; MARKOS VH; LADD TT et al.1982; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 67; NO 1; PP. 18-36; BIBL. 2 P.Article

REVERSAL IN PREFERENCE RESPONSES TO TWO TYPES OF INJUSTICE SITUATIONS: A METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTION TO EQUITY THEORYTORNBLOM KY.1982; HUMAN RELATIONS (NEW YORK); ISSN 0018-7267; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 11; PP. 991-1013; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE SALIENCE OF THE SELF IN RESPONSES TO INEQUITYREIS HT; BURNS LB.1982; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 5; PP. 464-475; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE JUSTICE MOTIVE: SOME HYPOTHESES AS TO ITS ORIGINS AND FORMS.LERNER MJ.1977; J. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 1; PP. 1-52; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CHEATING, INTENTION, AND PUNISHMENT FROM AN EQUITY THEORY PERSPECTIVE.SAVITSKY JC; BABL J.1976; J. RES. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 128-136; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

ON JUSTICE AS EQUALITY.SAMPSON EE.1975; J. SOC. ISSUES; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 45-64; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

Equity considerations in public risks evaluationFISHBURN, P. C; STRAFFIN, P. D.Operations research. 1989, Vol 37, Num 2, pp 229-239, issn 0030-364X, 11 p.Article

EQUITY AND SATISFACTION AMONG THE ELDERLYCARP FM; CARP A; MILLSAP R et al.1982; INT. J. AGING HUM. DEV.; ISSN 0091-4150; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 151-166; BIBL. 33 REF.Article