Current and Evolving Models of Peer ReviewFRESCO-SANTALLA, Ana; HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, Tony.The Serials librarian. 2014, Vol 67, Num 4, pp 373-398, issn 0361-526X, 26 p.Article

Notes on replication : Replication and Data AccessABBOTT, Andrew.Sociological methods & research. 2007, Vol 36, Num 2, pp 210-219, issn 0049-1241, 10 p.Article

Autopsy data in the peer review process improves outcomes analysis. DiscussionMARTIN, Berni T; FALLON, William F; PALMIERI, Patrick A et al.The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care. 2007, Vol 62, Num 1, pp 69-73, issn 1079-6061, 5 p.Article

Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the LiteratureFORD, Emily.Journal of scholarly publishing. 2013, Vol 44, Num 4, pp 311-326, issn 1198-9742, 16 p.Article

A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer ReviewLEE LYMAN, R.Journal of scholarly publishing. 2013, Vol 44, Num 3, pp 211-220, issn 1198-9742, 10 p.Article

Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis. CommentaryAUTORINO, Riccardo; QUARTO, Giuseppe; DI LORENZO, Giuseppe et al.European urology. 2007, Vol 51, Num 3, pp 833-840, issn 0302-2838, 8 p.Article

Assessing the quality of the peer review process: Author and editorial board member perspectivesBUNNER, Christina; LARSON, Elaine L.American journal of infection control. 2012, Vol 40, Num 8, pp 701-704, issn 0196-6553, 4 p.Article

Recognition, reward and responsibility : Why the authorship of scientific papers mattersWAGER, Elizabeth.Maturitas (Amsterdam). 2009, Vol 62, Num 2, pp 109-112, issn 0378-5122, 4 p.Article

Internationalization of peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and HumanitiesVERLEYSEN, Frederik T; ENGELS, Tim C. E.Scientometrics (Print). 2014, Vol 101, Num 2, pp 1431-1444, issn 0138-9130, 14 p.Conference Paper

Peer Review: Is It a Social Process?QUINTANA, Leónidas M.World neurosurgery (Print). 2011, Vol 76, Num 1-2, pp 41-42, issn 1878-8750, 2 p.Article

Some Thoughts on the Review ProcessSCHRAMM, Johannes.World neurosurgery (Print). 2011, Vol 76, Num 1-2, pp 43-44, issn 1878-8750, 2 p.Article

Improving the Peer-Review Process for Grant Applications : Reliability, Validity, Bias, and GeneralizabilityMARSH, Herbert W; JAYASINGHE, Upali W; BOND, Nigel W et al.The American psychologist. 2008, Vol 63, Num 3, pp 160-168, issn 0003-066X, 9 p.Article

Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposalsHUUTONIEMI, Katri.Social studies of science. 2012, Vol 42, Num 6, pp 897-921, issn 0306-3127, 25 p.Article

Journal peer review as an information retrieval processBORNMANN, Lutz; EGGHE, Leo.Journal of documentation. 2012, Vol 68, Num 4, pp 527-535, issn 0022-0418, 9 p.Article

What Does the Transactions Publish? What do Transactions' Readers Want to Read?CARLINER, Saul; COPPOLA, Nancy; GRADY, Helen et al.IEEE transactions on professional communication. 2011, Vol 54, Num 4, pp 341-359, issn 0361-1434, 19 p.Article

Snow White and the Wicked Problems of the West: A Look at the Lines between Empirical Description and Normative PrescriptionFARRELL, Katharine N.Science, technology, & human values. 2011, Vol 36, Num 3, pp 334-361, issn 0162-2439, 28 p.Article

Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal = Perceptions par les critiques du processus de critique par les pairs dans un périodique sur l'enseignement de la médecineSNELL, Linda; SPENCER, John.Medical education (Oxford. Print). 2005, Vol 39, Num 1, pp 90-97, issn 0308-0110, 8 p.Article

Bias in Peer ReviewLEE, Carole J; SUGIMOTO, Cassidy R; GUO ZHANG et al.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Print). 2013, Vol 64, Num 1, pp 2-17, issn 1532-2882, 16 p.Article

Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of 'Voting' in Peer Review = Jugements éditoriaux : une praxéologie du vote dans l'évaluation par les pairsHIRSCHAUER, Stefan.Social studies of science. 2010, Vol 40, Num 1, pp 71-103, issn 0306-3127, 33 p.Article

Seeding science, courting conclusions: Reexamining the intersection of science, corporate cash, and the law = Rééxaminer l'intersection entre science, entreprise commerciale, et le droitFREUDENBURG, William R.Sociological forum (Randolph, N.J.). 2005, Vol 20, Num 1, pp 3-33, issn 0884-8971, 31 p.Article

Scientific journal publications : On the role of electronic preprint exchange in the distribution of scientific literatureGUNNARSDOTTIR, Kristrun.Social studies of science. 2005, Vol 35, Num 4, pp 549-579, issn 0306-3127, 31 p.Article

A Label for Peer-Reviewed BooksVERLEYSEN, Frederik T; ENGELS, Tim C. E.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Print). 2013, Vol 64, Num 2, pp 428-430, issn 1532-2882, 3 p.Article

Replication data sets and favored-hypothesis bias : Comment on jeremy freese (2007) and hary king (2007) : Replication and Data AccessFIREBAUGH, Glenn.Sociological methods & research. 2007, Vol 36, Num 2, pp 200-209, issn 0049-1241, 10 p.Article

The Church and Peer Review: Was 'Peer' Review Fairer, More Honest Then Than Now?GOULD, Thomas H. P.Journal of scholarly publishing. 2012, Vol 44, Num 1, pp 37-60, issn 1198-9742, 24 p.Article

The Future of Peer Review: Four Possible Options to NothingnessGOULD, Thomas H. P.Publishing research quarterly. 2012, Vol 28, Num 4, pp 285-293, issn 1053-8801, 9 p.Article