Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia
- Author
- LÄHTEENMÄKI, M1 ; SALO, M2 ; TENOVUO, J3
[1] Department of Anaesthesiology, Satakunta Central Hospital, 28500 Pori, Finland
[2] Department of Anaesthesiology, Turku University Central Hospital, 20520 Turku, Finland
[3] Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland - Source
Anaesthesia. 1998, Vol 53, Num 11, pp 1067-1073 ; ref : 24 ref
- CODEN
- ANASAB
- ISSN
- 0003-2409
- Scientific domain
- Anesthesia, intensive care
- Publisher
- Blackwell, Oxford
- Publication country
- United Kingdom
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Anesthésie générale Anesthésique général Cavité buccale Composé volatil Etude comparative Femelle Halogène Composé organique Homme Hystérectomie Hôte Immunoglobuline Isoflurane Lysozyme Muqueuse Peroxidase Postopératoire Propofol Réponse défensive Réponse immune Salive Thiocyanate Chirurgie Enzyme Glycosidases Hydrolases O-Glycosidases Oxidoreductases Peroxidases
- Keyword (en)
- General anesthesia General anesthetic Oral cavity Volatile compound Comparative study Female Halogen Organic compounds Human Hysterectomy Host Immunoglobulins Isoflurane Lysozyme Mucosa Peroxidase Postoperative Propofol Defensive response Immune response Saliva Thiocyanates Surgery Enzyme Glycosidases Hydrolases O-Glycosidases Oxidoreductases Peroxidases
- Keyword (es)
- Anestesia general Anestésico general Cavidad bucal Compuesto volátil Estudio comparativo Hembra Halógeno Compuesto orgánico Hombre Histerectomía Huesped Inmunoglobulina Isoflurano Lysozyme Mucosa Peroxidase Postoperatorio Propofol Respuesta defensiva Respuesta inmune Saliva Tiocianato Cirugía Enzima Glycosidases Hydrolases O-Glycosidases Oxidoreductases Peroxidases
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B27 Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy / 002B27A Anesthesia / 002B27A02 General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation
- Discipline
- Anaesthesia. Reanimation. Transfusion. Cell therapy and gene therapy
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 1609281
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:32:\"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"53\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"11\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1067\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1073\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0003-2409\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"L\u00c4HTEENM\u00c4KI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"SALO, M\";i:1;s:10:\"TENOVUO, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ANASAB\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:9:\"Blackwell\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:32:\"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"53\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"11\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1067\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1073\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0003-2409\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"L\u00c4HTEENM\u00c4KI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"SALO, M\";i:1;s:10:\"TENOVUO, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ANASAB\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:9:\"Blackwell\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:32:\"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:32:\"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"53\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"11\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1067\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1073\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0003-2409\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"L\u00c4HTEENM\u00c4KI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"SALO, M\";i:1;s:10:\"TENOVUO, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ANASAB\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:9:\"Blackwell\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:32:\"10.1046\/j.1365-2044.1998.00529.x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:11:\"Anaesthesia\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"53\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"11\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"1067\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"1073\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0003-2409\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"L\u00c4HTEENM\u00c4KI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"SALO, M\";i:1;s:10:\"TENOVUO, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"ANASAB\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:127:\"Mucosal host defence response to hysterectomy assessed by saliva analyses : a comparison of propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:9:\"Blackwell\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
