Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis
- Author
- SAKAI, Tsutomu1 ; MATSUSHIMA, Masato2 ; SHIKISHIMA, Keigo1 ; KITAHARA, Kenji1
[1] Department of Ophthalmology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Division of Clinical Research and Development, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan - Source
Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN). 2007, Vol 114, Num 5, pp 949-956, 8 p ; ref : 22 ref
- CODEN
- OPHTDG
- ISSN
- 0161-6420
- Scientific domain
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier, New York, NY
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Etalon Etude comparative Fréquence Homme Nerf optique Norme Névrite optique rétrobulbaire Névrite optique Ophtalmologie Périmétrie Support matriciel Technologie Matrice Nerf crânien pathologie Oeil pathologie Système nerveux pathologie
- Keyword (en)
- Standard Comparative study Frequency Human Optic nerve Standards Optic neuritis Optic nevritis Ophthalmology Perimetry Matrix system Technology Cranial nerve disease Eye disease Nervous system diseases
- Keyword (es)
- Marco Estudio comparativo Frecuencia Hombre Nervio óptico Norma Neuropatía óptica retrobulbar Neuritis óptica Oftalmología Perimetría Soporte matricial Tecnología Nervio craneal patología Ojo patología Sistema nervioso patología
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B09 Ophthalmology / 002B09L Diseases of visual field, optic nerve, optic chiasma and optic tracts
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B09 Ophthalmology / 002B09N Miscellaneous
- Discipline
- Ophthalmology
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 18714603
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.033 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.033
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.12.033\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:29:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:28:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester MN)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"114\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"5\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"949\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"956\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0161-6420\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SAKAI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:7:\"Tsutomu\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:18:\"MATSUSHIMA, Masato\";i:1;s:17:\"SHIKISHIMA, Keigo\";i:2;s:15:\"KITAHARA, Kenji\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"OPHTDG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.12.033\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:29:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:28:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester MN)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"114\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"5\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"949\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"956\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0161-6420\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SAKAI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:7:\"Tsutomu\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:18:\"MATSUSHIMA, Masato\";i:1;s:17:\"SHIKISHIMA, Keigo\";i:2;s:15:\"KITAHARA, Kenji\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"OPHTDG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.12.033\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.12.033\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:29:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:28:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester MN)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"114\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"5\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"949\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"956\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0161-6420\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SAKAI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:7:\"Tsutomu\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:18:\"MATSUSHIMA, Masato\";i:1;s:17:\"SHIKISHIMA, Keigo\";i:2;s:15:\"KITAHARA, Kenji\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"OPHTDG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.12.033\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:29:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:28:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester MN)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"114\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"5\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"949\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"956\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0161-6420\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SAKAI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:7:\"Tsutomu\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:18:\"MATSUSHIMA, Masato\";i:1;s:17:\"SHIKISHIMA, Keigo\";i:2;s:15:\"KITAHARA, Kenji\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"OPHTDG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.12.033\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:29:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester, MN)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:28:\"Ophthalmology (Rochester MN)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"114\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"5\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"949\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"956\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0161-6420\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SAKAI\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:7:\"Tsutomu\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:18:\"MATSUSHIMA, Masato\";i:1;s:17:\"SHIKISHIMA, Keigo\";i:2;s:15:\"KITAHARA, Kenji\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"OPHTDG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:125:\"Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"8\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
