Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process
- Author
- HASHIMOTO, T1 ; ONDA, K2 3 ; NAKAMURA, Y3 ; TADA, K2 ; MIYA, A3 ; MURAKAMI, T1
[1] Japan Sewage Works Agency, 3-3-1 Yotsuya, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0004, Japan
[2] Ebara Corporation, 1-6-27 Kounan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8480, Japan
[3] Ebara Research Co., Ltd., 4-2-1 Honfujisawa, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa 251-8502, Japan - Source
Water research (Oxford). 2007, Vol 41, Num 10, pp 2117-2126, 10 p ; ref : 3/4 p
- CODEN
- WATRAG
- ISSN
- 0043-1354
- Scientific domain
- Biotechnology; Environment; Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science, Oxford
- Publication country
- United Kingdom
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Author keyword
- 17β-estradiol (E2) Conventional activated sludge Estrogenic activity Estrone (E1) Oxidation ditch process Solids retention time (SRT) Wastewater treatment process
- Keyword (fr)
- 17β-Oestradiol Activité biologique Boue activée Eau usée Epuration biologique Epuration eau usée Fossé oxydation Limite détection Oestrogène Perturbateur endocrinien Station épuration Temps rétention Traitement biologique Traitement déchet Japon Asie
- Keyword (en)
- 17β-Estradiol Biological activity Activated sludge Waste water Biological purification Waste water purification Oxidation ditch Detection limit Estrogen Endocrine disruptor Sewage treatment plant Retention time Biological treatment Waste treatment Japan Asia
- Keyword (es)
- 17β-Estradiol Actividad biológica Lodo activado Agua residual Depuración biológica Depuración aguas servidas Fosa oxidación Límite detección Estrógeno Disruptor endocrino Estación depuradora Tiempo retención Tratamiento biológico Tratamiento desperdicios Japón Asia
- Classification
- Pascal
- 001 Exact sciences and technology / 001D Applied sciences / 001D16 Pollution / 001D16A Water treatment and pollution
- Pascal
- 001 Exact sciences and technology / 001D Applied sciences / 001D16 Pollution / 001D16B Wastes / 001D16B06 Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge
- Discipline
- Pollution
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 18738453
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.029 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.029
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.watres.2007.02.029\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Water research (Oxford)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Water res. (Oxf.)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"41\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"10\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"2117\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"2126\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0043-1354\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"HASHIMOTO\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:7:\"ONDA, K\";i:1;s:11:\"NAKAMURA, Y\";i:2;s:7:\"TADA, K\";i:3;s:7:\"MIYA, A\";i:4;s:11:\"MURAKAMI, T\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"WATRAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Elsevier Science\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"10\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.watres.2007.02.029\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Water research (Oxford)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Water res. (Oxf.)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"41\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"10\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"2117\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"2126\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0043-1354\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"HASHIMOTO\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:7:\"ONDA, K\";i:1;s:11:\"NAKAMURA, Y\";i:2;s:7:\"TADA, K\";i:3;s:7:\"MIYA, A\";i:4;s:11:\"MURAKAMI, T\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"WATRAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Elsevier Science\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"10\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.watres.2007.02.029\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.watres.2007.02.029\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Water research (Oxford)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Water res. (Oxf.)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"41\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"10\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"2117\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"2126\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0043-1354\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"HASHIMOTO\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:7:\"ONDA, K\";i:1;s:11:\"NAKAMURA, Y\";i:2;s:7:\"TADA, K\";i:3;s:7:\"MIYA, A\";i:4;s:11:\"MURAKAMI, T\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"WATRAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Elsevier Science\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"10\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.watres.2007.02.029\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Water research (Oxford)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Water res. (Oxf.)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"41\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"10\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"2117\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"2126\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0043-1354\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"HASHIMOTO\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:7:\"ONDA, K\";i:1;s:11:\"NAKAMURA, Y\";i:2;s:7:\"TADA, K\";i:3;s:7:\"MIYA, A\";i:4;s:11:\"MURAKAMI, T\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"WATRAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Elsevier Science\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"10\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/j.watres.2007.02.029\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Water research (Oxford)\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Water res. (Oxf.)\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"41\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:2:\"10\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:4:\"2117\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:4:\"2126\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0043-1354\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"HASHIMOTO\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:7:\"ONDA, K\";i:1;s:11:\"NAKAMURA, Y\";i:2;s:7:\"TADA, K\";i:3;s:7:\"MIYA, A\";i:4;s:11:\"MURAKAMI, T\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"WATRAG\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Comparison of natural estrogen removal efficiency in the conventional activated sludge process and the oxidation ditch process\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Elsevier Science\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"10\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
