Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies
- Author
- KLEIN-GELTINK, J. E1 ; ROCHON, P. A2 ; DYER, S1 ; LAXER, M2 ; ANDERSON, G. M3
[1] Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada - Source
Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2007, Vol 60, Num 8, pp 766-772, 7 p ; ref : 37 ref
- ISSN
- 0895-4356
- Scientific domain
- General medicine general surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier, New York, NY
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Author keyword
- Administrative data Cohort studies Confounding factors (Epidemiology) Drug studies Guideline (PT) Retrospective studies
- Keyword (fr)
- Epidémiologie Etude cohorte Homme Médecine Médicament Méthode Méthodologie Recommandation Rétrospective Santé publique Utilisation Donnée administrative Etude d'observation Etude observationnelle Facteur confondant
- Keyword (en)
- Epidemiology Cohort study Human Medicine Drug Method Methodology Recommendation Retrospective Public health Use Administrative data Observational study Observational study Confounding factor
- Keyword (es)
- Epidemiología Estudio cohorte Hombre Medicina Medicamento Método Metodología Recomendación Retrospectiva Salud pública Uso Datos administrativos Estudio observacional Factor de confusión
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B30 Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine / 002B30A Public health. Hygiene / 002B30A01 General aspects / 002B30A01A Epidemiology / 002B30A01A1 Methodology
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B30 Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine / 002B30A Public health. Hygiene / 002B30A11 Miscellaneous
- Discipline
- Generalities in medical sciences Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 18920590
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:30:\"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:32:\"Journal of clinical epidemiology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:18:\"J. clin. epidemiol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"8\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"766\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"772\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0895-4356\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"KLEIN-GELTINK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. E\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:4:{i:0;s:12:\"ROCHON, P. A\";i:1;s:7:\"DYER, S\";i:2;s:8:\"LAXER, M\";i:3;s:14:\"ANDERSON, G. M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:30:\"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:32:\"Journal of clinical epidemiology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:18:\"J. clin. epidemiol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"8\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"766\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"772\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0895-4356\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"KLEIN-GELTINK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. E\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:4:{i:0;s:12:\"ROCHON, P. A\";i:1;s:7:\"DYER, S\";i:2;s:8:\"LAXER, M\";i:3;s:14:\"ANDERSON, G. M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:30:\"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:30:\"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:32:\"Journal of clinical epidemiology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:18:\"J. clin. epidemiol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"8\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"766\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"772\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0895-4356\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"KLEIN-GELTINK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. E\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:4:{i:0;s:12:\"ROCHON, P. A\";i:1;s:7:\"DYER, S\";i:2;s:8:\"LAXER, M\";i:3;s:14:\"ANDERSON, G. M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:30:\"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:32:\"Journal of clinical epidemiology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:18:\"J. clin. epidemiol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"8\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"766\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"772\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0895-4356\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"KLEIN-GELTINK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. E\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:4:{i:0;s:12:\"ROCHON, P. A\";i:1;s:7:\"DYER, S\";i:2;s:8:\"LAXER, M\";i:3;s:14:\"ANDERSON, G. M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:30:\"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:32:\"Journal of clinical epidemiology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:18:\"J. clin. epidemiol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2007\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"8\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"766\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"772\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0895-4356\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:13:\"KLEIN-GELTINK\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. E\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:4:{i:0;s:12:\"ROCHON, P. A\";i:1;s:7:\"DYER, S\";i:2;s:8:\"LAXER, M\";i:3;s:14:\"ANDERSON, G. M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:126:\"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:12:\"New York, NY\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:1:\"7\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
