Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management
- Author
- KEMP, B1 ; KERTSCHANSKA, S2 ; HANDT, S3 ; FUNK, A1 ; KAUFMANN, P2 ; RATH, W1
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aachen University of Technology, Germany
[2] Department of Anatomy, Aachen University of Technology, Germany
[3] Department of Pathology, Aachen University of Technology, Germany - Source
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1999, Vol 181, Num 3, pp 615-620 ; ref : 22 ref
- CODEN
- AJOGAH
- ISSN
- 0002-9378
- Scientific domain
- Obstetrics, gynecology, andrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Conduite à tenir Echodopplérométrie Echographie couleur Etude comparative Femelle Gestation ectopique Homme Immunohistochimie Implantation Trophoblaste Viabilité Allemagne Anatomopathologie Exploration ultrason Gestation pathologie Imagerie médicale Europe
- Keyword (en)
- Clinical management Duplex ultrasonography Color echography Comparative study Female Ectopic pregnancy Human Immunohistochemistry Implantation Trophoblaste Viability Germany Pathology Sonography Pregnancy disorders Medical imagery Europe
- Keyword (es)
- Actitud médica Ecodopplerometría Ecografía color Estudio comparativo Hembra Gestación ectópica Hombre Inmunohistoquímica Implantación Trofoblasto Viabilidad Alemania Anatomía patológica Exploración ultrasonido Gestación patología Imageneria medical Europa
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B20 Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics / 002B20F Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta / 002B20F02 Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
- Discipline
- Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 1937741
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Install on your browser
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:45:\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:22:\"Am. j. obstet. gynecol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1999\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"181\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"615\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"620\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0002-9378\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:4:\"KEMP\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:15:\"KERTSCHANSKA, S\";i:1;s:8:\"HANDT, S\";i:2;s:7:\"FUNK, A\";i:3;s:11:\"KAUFMANN, P\";i:4;s:7:\"RATH, W\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"AJOGAH\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:45:\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:22:\"Am. j. obstet. gynecol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1999\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"181\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"615\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"620\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0002-9378\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:4:\"KEMP\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:15:\"KERTSCHANSKA, S\";i:1;s:8:\"HANDT, S\";i:2;s:7:\"FUNK, A\";i:3;s:11:\"KAUFMANN, P\";i:4;s:7:\"RATH, W\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"AJOGAH\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:45:\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:22:\"Am. j. obstet. gynecol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1999\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"181\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"615\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"620\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0002-9378\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:4:\"KEMP\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:15:\"KERTSCHANSKA, S\";i:1;s:8:\"HANDT, S\";i:2;s:7:\"FUNK, A\";i:3;s:11:\"KAUFMANN, P\";i:4;s:7:\"RATH, W\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"AJOGAH\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:45:\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:22:\"Am. j. obstet. gynecol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1999\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"181\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"615\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"620\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0002-9378\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:4:\"KEMP\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:15:\"KERTSCHANSKA, S\";i:1;s:8:\"HANDT, S\";i:2;s:7:\"FUNK, A\";i:3;s:11:\"KAUFMANN, P\";i:4;s:7:\"RATH, W\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"AJOGAH\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:45:\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:22:\"Am. j. obstet. gynecol\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1999\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:3:\"181\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"615\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"620\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0002-9378\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:4:\"KEMP\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:15:\"KERTSCHANSKA, S\";i:1;s:8:\"HANDT, S\";i:2;s:7:\"FUNK, A\";i:3;s:11:\"KAUFMANN, P\";i:4;s:7:\"RATH, W\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"AJOGAH\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:121:\"Different placentation patterns in viable compared with nonviable tubal pregnancy suggest a divergent clinical management\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:16:\"Philadelphia, PA\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
