Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message
- Author
- KIRBY, S. D1 ; UREDA, J. R2 ; ROSE, R. L3 ; HUSSEY, J4
[1] Office of Communication, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
[2] Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
[3] Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
[4] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States - Source
Journal of health communication. 1998, Vol 3, Num 2, pp 119-135 ; ref : 1 p.3/4
- ISSN
- 1081-0730
- Scientific domain
- Hygiene and public health, epidemiology, occupational medicine
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis, London
- Publication country
- United Kingdom
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Communication information Communication verbale Ethnie Femelle Homme Mammographie Motivation Musique Noir américain Promotion santé Préférence Santé publique Etats Unis Radiodiagnostic Amérique du Nord Amérique
- Keyword (en)
- Information communication Verbal communication Ethnic group Female Human Mammography Motivation Music Black American Health promotion Preference Public health United States Radiodiagnosis North America America
- Keyword (es)
- Comunicación información Comunicación verbal Etnia Hembra Hombre Mastografía Motivación Música Negro americano Promoción salud Preferencia Salud pública Estados Unidos Radiodiagnóstico America del norte America
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B30 Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine / 002B30A Public health. Hygiene / 002B30A03 Prevention and actions / 002B30A03B Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)
- Discipline
- Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 2233215
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1080/108107398127418 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/108107398127418
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1080\/108107398127418\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:31:\"Journal of health communication\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:16:\"J. health commun\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"2\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"119\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"135\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1081-0730\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"KIRBY\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"S. D\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:11:\"UREDA, J. R\";i:1;s:10:\"ROSE, R. L\";i:2;s:9:\"HUSSEY, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"London\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Taylor & Francis\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1080\/108107398127418\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:31:\"Journal of health communication\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:16:\"J. health commun\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"2\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"119\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"135\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1081-0730\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"KIRBY\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"S. D\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:11:\"UREDA, J. R\";i:1;s:10:\"ROSE, R. L\";i:2;s:9:\"HUSSEY, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"London\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Taylor & Francis\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1080\/108107398127418\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1080\/108107398127418\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:31:\"Journal of health communication\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:16:\"J. health commun\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"2\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"119\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"135\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1081-0730\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"KIRBY\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"S. D\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:11:\"UREDA, J. R\";i:1;s:10:\"ROSE, R. L\";i:2;s:9:\"HUSSEY, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"London\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Taylor & Francis\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1080\/108107398127418\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:31:\"Journal of health communication\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:16:\"J. health commun\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1998\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"2\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"119\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"135\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1081-0730\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"KIRBY\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"S. D\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:3:{i:0;s:11:\"UREDA, J. R\";i:1;s:10:\"ROSE, R. L\";i:2;s:9:\"HUSSEY, J\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:89:\"Peripheral cues and involvement level : Influences on acceptance of a mammography message\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"London\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:16:\"Taylor & Francis\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
