Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009
- Author
- LEE, S1 ; GLENDENNING, P2 3 ; INDERJEETH, C. A1 2
[1] North Metropolitan Area Health Service, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] PathWest, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia - Source
Osteoporosis international. 2011, Vol 22, Num 3, pp 741-753, 13 p ; ref : 67 ref
- ISSN
- 0937-941X
- Scientific domain
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Springer, Heidelberg
- Publication country
- Germany
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Author keyword
- Adherence Compliance Medication Osteoporosis Persistence Preference
- Keyword (fr)
- Article synthèse Homme Observance thérapeutique Ostéoporose Persistance Préférence Revue bibliographique Rhumatologie Toxicité Traitement Voie administration Pathologie du système ostéoarticulaire
- Keyword (en)
- Review Human Treatment compliance Osteoporosis Persistence Preference Bibliographic review Rheumatology Toxicity Treatment Route of administration Diseases of the osteoarticular system
- Keyword (es)
- Artículo síntesis Hombre Observancia del tratamiento Osteoporosis Persistencia Preferencia Revista bibliográfica Reumatología Toxicidad Tratamiento Vía administración Sistema osteoarticular patología
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B15 Diseases of the osteoarticular system / 002B15A Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease
- Discipline
- Osteoarticular pathology
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 23904699
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1007/s00198-010-1335-x 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1335-x
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:25:\"10.1007\/s00198-010-1335-x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:26:\"Osteoporosis international\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Osteoporos. int\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2011\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"22\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"741\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"753\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0937-941X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:3:\"LEE\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"S\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:14:\"GLENDENNING, P\";i:1;s:16:\"INDERJEETH, C. A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:10:\"Heidelberg\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Springer\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"13\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:25:\"10.1007\/s00198-010-1335-x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:26:\"Osteoporosis international\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Osteoporos. int\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2011\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"22\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"741\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"753\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0937-941X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:3:\"LEE\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"S\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:14:\"GLENDENNING, P\";i:1;s:16:\"INDERJEETH, C. A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:10:\"Heidelberg\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Springer\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"13\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:25:\"10.1007\/s00198-010-1335-x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:25:\"10.1007\/s00198-010-1335-x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:26:\"Osteoporosis international\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Osteoporos. int\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2011\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"22\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"741\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"753\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0937-941X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:3:\"LEE\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"S\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:14:\"GLENDENNING, P\";i:1;s:16:\"INDERJEETH, C. A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:10:\"Heidelberg\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Springer\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"13\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:25:\"10.1007\/s00198-010-1335-x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:26:\"Osteoporosis international\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Osteoporos. int\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2011\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"22\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"741\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"753\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0937-941X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:3:\"LEE\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"S\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:14:\"GLENDENNING, P\";i:1;s:16:\"INDERJEETH, C. A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:10:\"Heidelberg\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Springer\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"13\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:25:\"10.1007\/s00198-010-1335-x\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:26:\"Osteoporosis international\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:15:\"Osteoporos. int\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"2011\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"22\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"3\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:3:\"741\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:3:\"753\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0937-941X\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:3:\"LEE\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"S\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:14:\"GLENDENNING, P\";i:1;s:16:\"INDERJEETH, C. A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:218:\"Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:10:\"Heidelberg\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Springer\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:2:\"13\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
