A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour
- Author
- EDDLESTON, J. M; HOLLAND, J. J; GRIFFIN, R. P; CORBETT, A; HORSMAN, E. L; REYNOLDS, F
Manchester Royal Infirmary, dep. anaesthesia, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom - Source
British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1996, Vol 76, Num 1, pp 66-71 ; ref : 27 ref
- CODEN
- BJANAD
- ISSN
- 0007-0912
- Scientific domain
- Anesthesia, intensive care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press, Oxford
- Publication country
- United Kingdom
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Accouchement Analgésie Anesthésie régionale Anesthésique local Anilide Bupivacaïne Etude comparative Femelle Homme Obstétrique Ropivacaïne Travail Voie extradurale
- Keyword (en)
- Delivery Analgesia Regional anesthesia Local anesthetic Anilide Comparative study Female Human Obstetrics Labour Extradural administration
- Keyword (es)
- Parto Analgesia Anestesia local Anestésico local Anilido Estudio comparativo Hembra Hombre Obstétrico Trabajo Vía extradural
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B02 Pharmacology. Drug treatments / 002B02B Neuropharmacology / 002B02B08 Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
- Discipline
- Pharmacological treatments
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 2970362
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1093/bja/76.1.66 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/76.1.66
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:19:\"10.1093\/bja\/76.1.66\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:30:\"British Journal of Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:14:\"Br. J. Anaesth\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1996\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"76\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"66\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"71\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0007-0912\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"EDDLESTON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:13:\"HOLLAND, J. J\";i:1;s:13:\"GRIFFIN, R. P\";i:2;s:10:\"CORBETT, A\";i:3;s:13:\"HORSMAN, E. L\";i:4;s:11:\"REYNOLDS, F\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BJANAD\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:23:\"Oxford University Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:19:\"10.1093\/bja\/76.1.66\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:30:\"British Journal of Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:14:\"Br. J. Anaesth\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1996\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"76\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"66\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"71\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0007-0912\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"EDDLESTON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:13:\"HOLLAND, J. J\";i:1;s:13:\"GRIFFIN, R. P\";i:2;s:10:\"CORBETT, A\";i:3;s:13:\"HORSMAN, E. L\";i:4;s:11:\"REYNOLDS, F\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BJANAD\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:23:\"Oxford University Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:19:\"10.1093\/bja\/76.1.66\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:19:\"10.1093\/bja\/76.1.66\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:30:\"British Journal of Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:14:\"Br. J. Anaesth\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1996\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"76\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"66\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"71\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0007-0912\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"EDDLESTON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:13:\"HOLLAND, J. J\";i:1;s:13:\"GRIFFIN, R. P\";i:2;s:10:\"CORBETT, A\";i:3;s:13:\"HORSMAN, E. L\";i:4;s:11:\"REYNOLDS, F\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BJANAD\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:23:\"Oxford University Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:19:\"10.1093\/bja\/76.1.66\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:30:\"British Journal of Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:14:\"Br. J. Anaesth\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1996\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"76\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"66\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"71\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0007-0912\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"EDDLESTON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:13:\"HOLLAND, J. J\";i:1;s:13:\"GRIFFIN, R. P\";i:2;s:10:\"CORBETT, A\";i:3;s:13:\"HORSMAN, E. L\";i:4;s:11:\"REYNOLDS, F\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BJANAD\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:23:\"Oxford University Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:19:\"10.1093\/bja\/76.1.66\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:30:\"British Journal of Anaesthesia\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:14:\"Br. J. Anaesth\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1996\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"76\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"66\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"71\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0007-0912\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:9:\"EDDLESTON\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:4:\"J. M\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:5:{i:0;s:13:\"HOLLAND, J. J\";i:1;s:13:\"GRIFFIN, R. P\";i:2;s:10:\"CORBETT, A\";i:3;s:13:\"HORSMAN, E. L\";i:4;s:11:\"REYNOLDS, F\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BJANAD\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:103:\"A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:23:\"Oxford University Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
