Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response
- Author
- SPEED, B1 ; DUNT, D1 ; SAAG, M. S (Author of reply)
[1] Fairfield hosp. infectious diseases, Fairfield Victoria 3078, Australia - Source
Clinical infectious diseases. 1995, Vol 21, Num 1, pp 28-36 ; ref : 41 ref
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
- Publication country
- United States
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Cryptococcose Cryptococcus neoformans Etude comparative Homme Relation hôte agent Symptomatologie Typage Australie Fungi Imperfecti Fungi Infection Mycose Thallophyta Océanie
- Keyword (en)
- Cryptococcosis Cryptococcus neoformans Comparative study Human Host agent relation Symptomatology Typing Australia Fungi Imperfecti Fungi Infection Mycosis Thallophyta Oceania
- Keyword (es)
- Criptococosis Cryptococcus neoformans Estudio comparativo Hombre Relación huesped agente Sintomatología Tipificación Australia Fungi Imperfecti Fungi Infección Micosis Thallophyta Oceania
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002B Medical sciences / 002B05 Infectious diseases / 002B05D Mycoses / 002B05D02 Human mycoses / 002B05D02L Miscellaneous mycoses
- Discipline
- Infectious pathology Tropical medicine
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 3601879
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1093/clinids/21.1.28 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinids/21.1.28
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1093\/clinids\/21.1.28\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:28:\"Clinical infectious diseases\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Clin. infect. dis\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1995\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"21\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"28\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"36\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1058-4838\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SPEED\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"DUNT, D\";i:1;s:10:\"SAAG, M. S\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"CIDIEL\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1093\/clinids\/21.1.28\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:28:\"Clinical infectious diseases\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Clin. infect. dis\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1995\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"21\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"28\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"36\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1058-4838\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SPEED\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"DUNT, D\";i:1;s:10:\"SAAG, M. S\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"CIDIEL\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1093\/clinids\/21.1.28\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1093\/clinids\/21.1.28\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:28:\"Clinical infectious diseases\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Clin. infect. dis\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1995\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"21\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"28\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"36\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1058-4838\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SPEED\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"DUNT, D\";i:1;s:10:\"SAAG, M. S\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"CIDIEL\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1093\/clinids\/21.1.28\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:28:\"Clinical infectious diseases\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Clin. infect. dis\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1995\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"21\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"28\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"36\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1058-4838\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SPEED\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"DUNT, D\";i:1;s:10:\"SAAG, M. S\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"CIDIEL\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:23:\"10.1093\/clinids\/21.1.28\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:28:\"Clinical infectious diseases\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:17:\"Clin. infect. dis\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1995\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"21\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"28\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"36\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"1058-4838\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:5:\"SPEED\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"B\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:7:\"DUNT, D\";i:1;s:10:\"SAAG, M. S\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"CIDIEL\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:118:\"Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Editorial response\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:11:\"Chicago, IL\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:27:\"University of Chicago Press\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
