A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions
- Author
- PERRINS, J; WILLIAMSON, M; FITTER, A
Univ. York, biology dep., York Y01 5DD, United Kingdom - Source
Biological conservation. 1992, Vol 60, Num 1, pp 47-56 ; ref : 15 ref
- CODEN
- BICOBK
- ISSN
- 0006-3207
- Scientific domain
- Ecology; Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier, Oxford
- Publication country
- United Kingdom
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- Classification Dynamique population Espèce introduite Mauvaise herbe Protection flore Royaume Uni Europe
- Keyword (en)
- Classification Population dynamics Introduced species Weed Plant conservation United Kingdom Europe
- Keyword (es)
- Clasificación Dinámica población Especie introducida Mala hierba Protección flora Reino Unido Europa
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002A Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology / 002A14 Animal, plant and microbial ecology / 002A14D Applied ecology / 002A14D02 Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002A Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology / 002A32 Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
- Discipline
- Agronomy. Soil sciences and vegetal productions Animal, vegetal and microbial ecology
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- 5228169
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Access to the document
Install on your browser
DOI
10.1016/0006-3207(92)90798-R 
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)90798-R
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/0006-3207(92)90798-R\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Biological conservation\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:13:\"Biol. conserv\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1992\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"47\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"56\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0006-3207\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"PERRINS\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"J\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"WILLIAMSON, M\";i:1;s:9:\"FITTER, A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BICOBK\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/0006-3207(92)90798-R\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Biological conservation\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:13:\"Biol. conserv\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1992\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"47\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"56\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0006-3207\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"PERRINS\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"J\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"WILLIAMSON, M\";i:1;s:9:\"FITTER, A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BICOBK\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"UnpaywallOpenUrl\":35:{s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000email\";s:27:\"assistance-portail@inist.fr\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/0006-3207(92)90798-R\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";N;s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";N;s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";N;s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";N;}"
Unpaywall access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/0006-3207(92)90798-R\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Biological conservation\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:13:\"Biol. conserv\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1992\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"47\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"56\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0006-3207\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"PERRINS\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"J\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"WILLIAMSON, M\";i:1;s:9:\"FITTER, A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BICOBK\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:28:\"10.1016\/0006-3207(92)90798-R\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:23:\"Biological conservation\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:13:\"Biol. conserv\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1992\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:2:\"60\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:1:\"1\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:2:\"47\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:2:\"56\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:9:\"0006-3207\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"PERRINS\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"J\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";s:0:\"\";s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:2:{i:0;s:13:\"WILLIAMSON, M\";i:1;s:9:\"FITTER, A\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:6:\"BICOBK\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:97:\"A survey of differing views of weed classification : implications for regulation of introductions\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:6:\"Oxford\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:8:\"Elsevier\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
