EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T
- Author
- FYLLING P; FAGERHOL M
ULLEVAL HOSP., OSLO, NOR - Source
- FERTIL. AND STERIL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 138-141; BIBL. 15 REF.
- Document type
- Article
- Language
- English
- Keyword (fr)
- CONTRACEPTIF STERILET CHARGE SUBSTANCE ACTIVE PROGESTASERT ETUDE COMPARATIVE EXPLORATION IMMUNOLOGIQUE HOMME GYNECOLOGIE NOVA-T REPRODUCTION
- Keyword (en)
- CONTRACEPTIVE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE LOADED INTRAUTERINE DEVICE COMPARATIVE STUDY IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION HUMAN GYNECOLOGY REPRODUCTION
- Keyword (es)
- REPRODUCCION
- Classification
- Pascal
- 002 Biological and medical sciences / 002A Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology / 002A29 Vertebrates: reproduction
- Discipline
- Vertebrates : reproduction
- Origin
- Inist-CNRS
- Database
- PASCAL
- INIST identifier
- PASCAL7950460194
Sauf mention contraire ci-dessus, le contenu de cette notice bibliographique peut être utilisé dans le cadre d’une licence CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS / Unless otherwise stated above, the content of this bibliographic record may be used under a CC BY 4.0 licence by Inist-CNRS / A menos que se haya señalado antes, el contenido de este registro bibliográfico puede ser utilizado al amparo de una licencia CC BY 4.0 Inist-CNRS
Install on your browser
"O:13:\"PanistOpenUrl\":36:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000idc\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1979\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"FYLLING\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"P\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:10:\"FAGERHOL M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Panist access
"O:12:\"IstexOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1979\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"FYLLING\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"P\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:10:\"FAGERHOL M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Istex access
"O:16:\"EuropePMCOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1979\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"FYLLING\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"P\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:10:\"FAGERHOL M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Europe PubMed Central access
"O:11:\"BaseOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1979\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"FYLLING\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"P\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:10:\"FAGERHOL M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
Base Search access
"O:12:\"ArXivOpenUrl\":35:{s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000openUrl\";N;s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000fmt\";s:7:\"journal\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000doi\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pii\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000pmid\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000atitle\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000jtitle\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000stitle\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000date\";s:4:\"1979\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000volume\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000issue\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000spage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000epage\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000pages\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000issn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000eissn\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aulast\";s:7:\"FYLLING\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000aufirst\";s:1:\"P\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000auinit\";N;s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000auinitm\";N;s:5:\"\u0000*\u0000au\";a:1:{i:0;s:10:\"FAGERHOL M\";}s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000aucorp\";s:0:\"\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000isbn\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000coden\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000genre\";s:7:\"article\";s:7:\"\u0000*\u0000part\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000btitle\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000title\";s:112:\"EXPERIENCE WITH TWO DIFFERENT MEDICATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PROGESTASERT AND NOVA-T\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000place\";s:0:\"\";s:6:\"\u0000*\u0000pub\";s:0:\"\";s:10:\"\u0000*\u0000edition\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000tpages\";s:0:\"\";s:9:\"\u0000*\u0000series\";s:0:\"\";s:8:\"\u0000*\u0000proxy\";s:30:\"http:\/\/proxyout.inist.fr:8080\/\";s:12:\"\u0000*\u0000integrite\";b:1;}"
arXiv access
