Importance of the back-café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-upCHRISTENSEN, Finn B; LAURBERG, Ida; BÜNGER, Cody E et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2003, Vol 28, Num 23, pp 2561-2569, issn 0362-2436, 9 p.Article

Sagittal Spinal Balance After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: The Impact of Anterior Column Support Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial With an Eightto Thirteen-Year Radiographic Follow-upVIDEBAEK, Tina S; BÜNGER, Cody E; HENRIKSEN, Mads et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2011, Vol 36, Num 3, pp 183-191, issn 0362-2436, 9 p.Article

Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: The Impact of Anterior Column Support: A Randomized Clinical Trial With an Eight- to Thirteen-Year Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-upVIDEBAEK, Tina S; EGUND, Niels; CHRISTENSEN, Finn B et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2010, Vol 35, Num 22, pp 1955-1964, issn 0362-2436, 10 p.Article

Posterolateral spinal fusion at unintended levels due to bone-graft migration: No effect on clinical outcome in 19/130 patientsCHRISTENSEN, Finn B; LAURSEN, Malene; GELINECK, John et al.Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2001, Vol 72, Num 4, pp 354-358, issn 0001-6470Article

Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: Randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-upCHRISTENSEN, Finn Bjarke; HANSEN, Ebbe Stender; LAURSEN, Malene et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2002, Vol 27, Num 12, pp 1269-1277, issn 0362-2436Article

Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective : Cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back painSOEGAARD, Rikke; BÜNGER, Cody E; CHRISTIANSEN, Terkel et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2007, Vol 32, Num 22, pp 2405-2414, issn 0362-2436, 10 p.Article

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of radiograph interpretation with and without pedicle screw implants: The need for a detailed classification system in posterolateral spinal fusion. Point of viewCHRISTENSEN, Finn B; LAURSEN, Malene; GELINECK, John et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2001, Vol 26, Num 5, pp 538-544, issn 0362-2436Article

Spinal blood flow in 24-hour megadose glucocorticoid treatment in awake pigsDRESCHER, Wolf R; WEIGERT, Karen P; BÜNGER, Mathias H et al.Journal of neurosurgery. 2003, Vol 99, Num 3, pp 286-290, issn 0022-3085, 5 p., SUPArticle

Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: A prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patientsCHRISTENSEN, Finn B; HANSEN, Ebbe S; EISKJAER, Siren P et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2002, Vol 27, Num 23, pp 2674-2683, issn 0362-2436, 10 p.Article

Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion : Long-term results of a randomized clinical trialVIDEBAEK, Tina S; CHRISTENSEN, Finn B; SOEGAARD, Rikke et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2006, Vol 31, Num 25, pp 2875-2880, issn 0362-2436, 6 p.Article

The Effect of Early Initiation of Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Randomized Clinical StudyOESTERGAARD, Lisa G; NIELSEN, Claus V; BUNGER, Cody E et al.Spine (Philadelphia, PA. 1976). 2012, Vol 37, Num 21, pp 1803-1809, issn 0362-2436, 7 p.Article