ESTIMATION OF THE RELATIVE VALIDITY OF EMPLOYEE SELECTION TESTS FROM INFORMATION COMMONLY AVAILABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT RANGE RESTRICTIONHSU LM.1982; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 67; NO 4; PP. 509-511; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS OF SCORING TRUE-FALSE TESTSHSU LM.1979; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 39; NO 4; PP. 785-790; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

TEST OF DIFFERENCES IN P LEVELS AS TESTS OF DIFFERENCES IN EFFECT SIZESHSU LM.1980; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 88; NO 3; PP. 705-708; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

DETERMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF ITEMS AND PASSING SCORE IN A MASTERY TESTHSU LM.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 709-714; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ON THE POWER OF MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT TESTS WHEN THE EXPERIMENTWISE ERROR RATE IS CONTROLLEDHSU LM.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 31-40; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE LEVELS FOR TESTS ON ITEM VALIDITY.HSU LM.1978; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 209-211; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF QUESTIONS IN A MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTHSU LM.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 47; NO 2; PP. 613-614; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

DEPENDENCE OF THE RELATIVE DIFFICULTY OF TRUE-FALSE AND GROUPED TRUE-FALSE TESTS ON THE ABILITY LEVELS OF THE EXAMINEESHSU LM.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0013-1644; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 4; PP. 891-894; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

A CHI-SQUARED/D.F. TEST FOR INTERACTION IN TWO-TREATMENT REPEATED MEASUREMENTS DESIGNSHSU LM.1980; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 291-299; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

A NOTE CONCERNING SOME NONPARAMETRIC TEST OF PREDICTED ORDERHSU LM.1979; BIOMETR. J.; DDR; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 8; PP. 749-753; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

DETERMINATION OF RISK OF MIS-RANKING A PAIR OF EXAMINEES ON A MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTHSU LM.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1265-1266; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

A POISSON METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE MAXIMUM TOLERABLE NUMBER OF TYPE I ERRORS.HSU LM.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 1; PP. 211-218; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

A COMMENT ON "CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR TALLY DATA".HSU LM; CLINTON L.1978; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 98; NO 1; PP. 1-3; BIBL. DISSEM.Article