au.\*:("RUDKIN, G. E")
Results 1 to 15 of 15
Selection :
Peri-operative outcome for day-case laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairRUDKIN, G. E; MADDERN, G. J.Anaesthesia. 1995, Vol 50, Num 7, pp 586-589, issn 0003-2409Article
Outcome after day-care surgery in a major teaching hospitalOSBORNE, G. A; RUDKIN, G. E.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1993, Vol 21, Num 6, pp 822-827, issn 0310-057XArticle
Fluid uptake in laser endometrial ablationOSBORNE, G. A; RUDKIN, G. E; MORAN, P et al.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1991, Vol 19, Num 2, pp 217-219, issn 0310-057X, 3 p.Article
Impediments to the use of ankle block in AustraliaRUDKIN, G. E; MICALLEF, T. A.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 2004, Vol 32, Num 3, pp 368-371, issn 0310-057X, 4 p.Article
Outcome from day-case knee arthroscopy in a major teaching hospitalCARDOSA, M; RUDKIN, G. E; OSBORNE, G. A et al.Arthroscopy (Print). 1994, Vol 10, Num 6, pp 624-629, issn 0749-8063Article
Assessment and selection of patients for day surgery in a public hospitalRUDKIN, G. E; OSBORNE, G. A; DOYLE, C. E et al.Medical journal of Australia. 1993, Vol 158, Num 5, pp 308-312, issn 0025-729XArticle
Intra-operative patient-controlled sedationRUDKIN, G. E; OSBORNE, G. A; CURTIS, N. J et al.Anaesthesia. 1991, Vol 46, Num 2, pp 90-92, issn 0003-2409, 3 p.Article
Can medical students contribute to quality assurance programmes in day surgery ? = Est-ce que les étudiants en médecine peuvent contribuer à contrôler la qualité des programmes pour les consultations de jourRUDKIN, G. E; O'DRISCOLL, M. C. E; LIMB, R et al.Medical education (Oxford. Print). 1999, Vol 33, Num 7, pp 509-514, issn 0308-0110Article
Review of efficiencies and patient satisfaction in Australian and New Zealand day surgery units : a pilot studyRUDKIN, G. E; BACON, A. K; BURROW, B et al.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1996, Vol 24, Num 1, pp 74-78, issn 0310-057XConference Paper
Inguinal field block for adult inguinal hernia repair using a short-level needle. Description and clinical experience in Solomon Islands and an Australian Teaching HospitalSPARKS, C. J; RUDKIN, G. E; AGIOMEA, K et al.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1995, Vol 23, Num 2, pp 143-148, issn 0310-057XConference Paper
Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation : comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolamRUDKIN, G. E; OSBORNE, G. A; FINN, B. P et al.Anaesthesia. 1992, Vol 47, Num 5, pp 376-381, issn 0003-2409Article
Outcomes after same-day oral surgery : a review of 1,180 cases at a major teaching hospitalCHYE, E. P. Y; YOUNG, I. G; OSBORNE, G. A et al.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 1993, Vol 51, Num 8, pp 846-849, issn 0278-2391Article
Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation : comparison of patient-controlled propofol with anaesthetist-administered midazolam and fentanylOSBORNE, G. A; RUDKIN, G. E; CURTIS, N. J et al.Anaesthesia. 1991, Vol 46, Num 7, pp 553-556, issn 0003-2409, 4 p.Article
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedureSINGLETON, R. J; RUDKIN, G. E; OSBORNE, G. A et al.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1996, Vol 24, Num 2, pp 231-236, issn 0310-057XConference Paper
Double-blind comparison of patient recovery after induction with propofol or thiopentone for day-case relaxant general anaesthesiaCHITTLEBOROUGH, M. C; OSBORNE, G. A; RUDKIN, G. E et al.Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1992, Vol 20, Num 2, pp 169-173, issn 0310-057XConference Paper