QUERIES'N THEORIES: AN INSTRUCTIONAL GAME ON THE DOT, DOT, DOT,... APPROACH TO SCIENTIFIC METHODALLEN LE.1974; INSTRUCT. SCI.; NETHERL.; DA. 1974; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 205-224; BIBL. 6REF.Article

ELICITATION OF COOPERATION BY RETALIATORY AND NONRETALIATORY STRATEGIES IN A MIXED-MOTIVE GAMEGRUDER CL; DUSLAK RJ.1973; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 162-174; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

AUTHORITARIAN BEHAVIOR IN A CONFLICT SITUATION = COMPORTEMENT AUTORITAIRE DANS UNE SITUATION DE CONFLITSLACK BD; COOK JO.1973; J. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 25; NO 1; PP. 130-136; BIBL. 11REF.Article

EFFECTS OF EXTREMITY OF OFFERS AND CONCESSION RATE ON THE OUTCOMES OF BARGAINING = LES EFFETS DES OFFRES EXTREMES ET DU TAUX DE CONCESSION SUR LES RESULTATS DE LA NEGOCIATIONBENTON AA; KELLEY HH; LIEBLING B et al.1972; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 73-83; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

GROUP PROVISION OF STEP GOODS.HARDIN R.1976; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 101-106; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

TEACHING AMERICAN GOVERNMENT WITH GAMES.HENDERSON TA; FOSTER JL.1976; SIMUL. AND GAMES; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 177-192; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

TOWARD AN EXPLANATION OF EXPERIMENTALLY OBTAINED OUTCOMES TO A SIMPLE, MAJORITY RULE GAMEWESTEN TE; BUCKLEY JJ.1974; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 198-236; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

DEFENSE, VULNERABILITY, AND COOPERATION IN A MIXED-MOTIVE GAME = DEFENSE, VULNERABILITE ET COOPERATION DANS UN JEU A MOTIVATION MIXTEBERKOWITZ NH; HYLANDER L; BAKAITIS R et al.1973; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 401-407; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

BEHAVIORAL PROCESSES IN DIFFERENT MINIMAL SOCIAL SITUATIONS = PROCESSUS COMPORTEMENTAUX DANS DIVERSES SITUATIONS SOCIALES MINIMALESWOLF G.1972; COMP. GROUP STUD.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 221-239; BIBL. 21REF.Article

STRATEGY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL GAMBLING = LES DIFFERENCES DE STRATEGIES DANS DES JEUX DE GROUPES ET INDIVIDUELSMCCAULEY C; KRAMER L.1972; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 8; NO 6; PP. 518-527; BIBL. 1P.Article

DIMENSION SOCIALE DE LA PERSONNALITE A LA LUMIERE DE JEUX EXPERIMENTAUXKRIVOHLAVY J.1972; CESKOSL. PSYCHOL.; CESKOSL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 16; NO 4-5; PP. 420-441; ABS. RUSSE ANGL.; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPT OF !!LOSING MOVE'' IN A GAME OF PERFECT INFORMATIONSIMON HA.1974; PROC. NATION. ACAD. SCI. U.S.A.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 71; NO 6; PP. 2276-2279; BIBL. 1REF.Article

ENTRAPMENT IN 2 X 2 GAMES WITH FORCE VULNERABLE EQUILIBRIA = LES SITUATIONS-PIEGES DANS LES JEUX A 2 PERSONNES ET 2 CHOIX AVEC LES CONDITIONS D'EQUILIBRE DEFICIENTSTEVENSON MB; PHILLIPS JL.1972; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 361-370; BIBL. 8REF.Article

SUCCESS AND RESPONSE RATE IN COMPLEX DECISION MAKING = VITESSE DE REPONSE ET SUCCES DANS LA PRISE DE DECISION COMPLEXESTREUFERT S.1972; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 8; NO 5; PP. 389-403; BIBL. 16REF.Article

DEVELOPING IMAGINATION THROUGH SCAMPER = LE DEVELOPPEMENT DE L'IMAGINATION AU MOYEN DES JEUX EXPERIMENTAUXEBERLE RF.1972; J. CREAT. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 199-203Article

FACTORS LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE RISKY-SHIFT PHENOMENON = FACTEURS LIMITANT LE CARACTERE GENERAL DU PHENOMENE DE CHANGEMENT DE PRISE DE RISQUELAMM H; OCHSMANN R.1972; EUROP. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; NETHERL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 455-458; BIBL. 4REF.Article

RISK TAKING AS A FUNCTION OF AN INDIVIDUAL'S IMPRESSION OF THE POWER SITUATION = LA PRISE DE RISQUE EN FONCTION DE L'IMPRESSION DU SUJET CONCERNANT LE RAPPORT DES FORCESMINDOCK R.1972; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 471-474; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

SEX ROLE AND COOPERATION IN THE GAME OF CHICKEN = ROLE SEXUEL ET COOPERATION DANS UN JEU EXPERIMENTALCONRATH DW.1972; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 433-443; BIBL. 15REF.Article

LA NATURE DES JEUX INTELLECTUELS A LA LUMIERE DE L'INTELLIGENCE CONCEPTUELLE ARTIFICIELLECHAVCHANIDZE VV.1972; SOOBSHCH. AKAD. NAUK GRUZ. S.S.R.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1972; VOL. 66; NO 2; PP. 289-292; ABS. GEORGIEN ANGL.; BIBL. 7REF.Article

A STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF QUANTITATIVE TRAINING = UNE ETUDE DES EFFETS DE LA FORMATION QUANTITATIVEELIASON AL.1972; ACAD. MANAG. J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 147-158; BIBL. 2REF.Article

A GAME THEORETIC ANALYSIS OF OLSON'S GAME OF COLLECTIVE ACTION.SCHOFIELD N.1975; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 441-461; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

RESPONSIVENESS IN TWO-PERSON ZERO-SUM GAMES = LES REPONSES AUX JEUX A SOMME NULLE POUR DEUX PERSONNESKAHAN JP; GOEHRING DJ.1973; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 27-33; BIBL. 15REF.Article

DETERMINANTS OF COALITIONAL BEHAVIOR OF MEN AND WOMEN: SEX ROLES OR SITUATIONAL REQUIREMENTS. = LES DETERMINANTS DU COMPORTEMENT DE COALITION CHEZ LE SEXE MASCULIN ET LE SEXE FEMININ: ROLES SEXUELS OU DEMANDES SITUATIONNELLES.LIRTZMAN SI; WAHBA MA.1972; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 56; NO 5; PP. 406-411; BIBL. 18REF.Article

AN INTERVAL-SCALE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR ALL 2 X 2 GAMES = UN SYSTEME DE CLASSIFICATION PAR ECHELLES D'INTERVALLES CONCERNANT LES JEUX A 2 PERSONNES ET 2 CHOIXHARRIS RJ.1972; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 371-383; BIBL. 10REF.Article

EFFECTS OF GRAND COALITION PAYOFFS ON COALITION FORMATION IN THREE-PERSON GAMES.MEDLIN SM.1976; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 21; NO 1; PP. 48-61; BIBL. 18 REF.Article