PRIMARY AND SECONDARY NEGATIVE INCENTIVE CONSTRAST IN DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING = CONTRASTE DE MOTIVATION NEGATIF PRIMAIRE ET SECONDAIRE DANS LE CONDITIONNEMENT DIFFERENTIELCHECHILE R; FOWLER H.1973; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 97; NO 2; PP. 189-197; BIBL. 22REF.Article

A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING ANALYSIS OF 16 COMPLEX SOUNDS.HOWARD JH JR; SILVERMAN EB.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 193-200; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

WHEN ITEM RECOGNITION AND VISUAL SEARCH FUNCTIONS ARE SIMILAR = QUAND IL Y A SIMILITUDE ENTRE LES FONCTIONS RECONNAISSANCE DE L'ITEM ET RECHERCHE VISUELLEKRISTOFFERSON MW.1972; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 379-384; BIBL. 9REF.Article

SOMIGLIANZA INTRASERIALE ED APPRENDIMENTO INCIDENTALE = RESSEMBLANCE ENTRE SERIES ET APPRENTISSAGE LATENTMEAZZINI P.1972; RIV. PSICOL.; ITAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 66; NO 3-4; PP. 153-168; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 19REF.Article

THE ADDITIVE DIFFERENCE MODEL AND A METRIC AND AN ORDERING ON SETSBECKER J; PIPAHL W.1974; PSYCHOMETRIKA; E.U.; DA. 1974; VOL. 39; NO 3; PP. 361-362; BIBL. 5REF.Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS SIMILARITY AND RESPONSE CRITERION ON SUCCESSIVE DISCRIMINATION REVERSAL LEARNING = EFFETS DE LA SIMILITUDE DU STIMULUS ET DU CRITERE DE LA REPONSE SUR L'APPRENTISSAGE INVERSE DE DISCRIMINATIONS SUCCESSIVESMILLER JT; HANSEN G; THOMAS DR et al.1972; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 81; NO 8; PP. 434-440; BIBL. 11REF.Article

REMARKS ON THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS: THE EFFECT OF NON-NORMALITY IN THURSTONE'S COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT MODELSUBKOVIAK MJ.1974; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 34; NO 4; PP. 829-835; BIBL. 8REF.Article

JUDGMENTS OF SLOP VARIABILITY IN VISUAL PATTERNS = ESTIMATIONS DE LA VARIABILITE DE LA PENTE DANS LES STRUCTURES VISUELLESANDERSON NS; ROSENFELD A.1972; PSYCHON. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 29; NO 4A; PP. 216-218; BIBL. 8REF.Article

TRANSLATIONS AS INTERPAIR RIGHT AND WRONG ITEMS IN DOUBLE-FUNCTION VERBAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING.NEWBY RW.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 247-250; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

CHOICE RT WITH SIGNALS OF UNEQUAL INTENSITYBREBNER J; TIIVAS K.1975; AUSTRAL. J. PSYCHOL.; AUSTRAL.; DA. 1975; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 47-50; BIBL. 14REFArticle

STIMULUS DIMENSIONS OR STIMULUS ASPECTS. A COMPARISON OF BOTH CONCEPTS BY MEANS OF SIMILARITY JUDGMENTSBECKER J.1980; PSYCHOL. RES.; ISSN 0340-0727; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 42; NO 3; PP. 227-240; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

SUBJECTIVE MAGNITUDE INFORMATION IN SEMANTIC ORDERINGS.HOLYOAK K; WALKER JH.1976; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB., BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 15; NO 3; PP. 287-299; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

NEGATIVE SIMILARITIES.LUNDBERG U; DEVINE B.1975; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 35; NO 4; PP. 797-807; BIBL. 1 P.Article

RATED FUNNINESS AND DISSIMILARITY OF FIGURES. DIVERGENCE FROM EXPECTANCYNERHARDT G.1975; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWED.; DA. 1975; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 156-166; BIBL. 6REFArticle

CLASS STRUCTURE IN THE BIASING OF PERCEIVED PATTERN SIMILARITYAIKEN LS; FENKER RM; EVANS SH et al.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 3; PP. 489-501; BIBL. 24REF.Article

SEQUENCES OF SIMILARITY JUDGMENTS AS TIME SERIESGREGSON RAM.1974; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1974; VOL. 38; NO 6; PP. 429-445; BIBL. 20REF.Article

EFFECTS OF SHOCK AND SAFE BOX SIMILARITY ON ESCAPE TRAINING AND EXTINCTION = EFFETS DE LA SIMILITUDE DES BOITES AVEC OU SANS CHOC SUR L'APPRENTISSAGE D'EVITEMENT ET L'EXTINCTIONKASH JS; FRANCHINA JJ.1972; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 239-242; BIBL. 3REF.Article

MODIFIERS IN METAPHORS: EFFECTS OF CONSTITUENT PHRASE SIMILARITY ON THE INTERPRETATION OF FIGURATIVE SENTENCES.MALGADY RC; JOHNSON MG.1976; J. PSYCHOLINGUIST. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 43-52; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

VIOLATION OF ASSUMED NORMALITY IN TRADITIONAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING.SUBKOVIAK MJ; DAVID FARR S.1976; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 639-645; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

INFLUENCE OF SIMILARITY BETWEEN TARGET AND IRRELEVANT ITEMS ON VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING.SOLMAN RT.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 41; NO 1; PP. 43-48; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

INTEGRATION OF FEATURES IN COMPARING MULTIFEATURE STIMULI.KLATZKY RL; THOMPSON A.1975; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 428-432; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

REINFORCEMENT, AFFECT, AND INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION.SINGH R.1975; PSYCHOLOGIA; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 142-148; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A COMMON MECHANISM MEDIATING THE TIME-ORDER ERROR AND THE CROSS-OVER EFFECT IN COMPARATIVE JUDGMENTS OF LOUDNESSJOHN ID.1975; AUSTRAL. J. PSYCHOL.; AUSTRAL.; DA. 1975; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 51-60; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF IDENTICAL ELEMENTS AMONG STIMULI WITH MEANINGFUL UNITSRUNQUIST WN.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 3; PP. 592-593; BIBL. 3REF.Article

LES PARAPHRASES: ETUDE SEMANTIQUE, LEUR ROLE DANS L'APPRENTISSAGE.VEZIN L.1976; ANNEE PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; VOL. 76; NO 1; PP. 177-197; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article