Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("STIMULUS DURATION")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Origin

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 1457

  • Page / 59
Export

Selection :

  • and

ACUITE VISUELLE LORS DES EXPOSITIONS COURTES A DES STIMULUSYAMADE S; HUKAMI K.1980; NIPPON GANKA KIYO; ISSN 0015-5667; JPN; DA. 1980; VOL. 31; NO 5; PP. 890-893; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

ERG OFF-EFFECTS PRODUCED BY SHORT DURATION STIMULIWALTERS JW; SMITH EL III; MANNY RE et al.1981; AM. J. OPTOM PHYSIOL. OPT.; ISSN 0093-7002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 58; NO 10; PP. 792-796; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

STIMULUS DURATION AND GRATING PERSISTENCE: AN INSTANCE OF THE 100-MSEC RULE.STANLEY G; HOWELL ER; SMITH G et al.1980; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1980 PUBL. 1981; VOL. 28; NO 6; PP. 597-598; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

EFFECT OF STIMULUS PRESENTATION DURATION ON GUSTATORY REACTION TIMELESTER B; HALPERN BP.1979; PHYSIOL. AND BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 319-324; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

VARIATIONS DE LA SONIE D'UN SON BREF COMPARE AVEC UN AUTRE SON BREF EN FONCTION DE LA DUREE DES DEUX SONS.SZYMANSKI L; CHOCHOLLE R.1976; C.R. SOC. BIOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; VOL. 170; NO 3; PP. 558-562; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

OPPONENT-COLOR CELLS CAN INFLUENCE DETECTION OF SMALL, BRIEF LIGHTSFINKELSTEIN MA; HOOD DC.1982; VIS. RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 89-95; BIBL. 41 REF.Article

PERCEIVED DURATION OF AUDITORY SEQUENCESSIVYER M; FINLAY D.1982; JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1309; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 107; NO 2; PP. 209-217; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

FORWARD MASKING: INTERACTION OF PROBE DURATION AND MASK DURATION.BEATTIE RC; PAPPAS NJ; SMIAROWSKI RA et al.1974; J. AUDIT. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 263-272; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF DURATION AND LUMINANCE ON BINOCULAR DEPTH MIXTUREBIRCH EE; FOLEY JM.1979; PERCEPTION; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 263-267; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

VISUAL TEMPORAL DISCRIMINATIONS OF BRIEF PULSE INTERVALSNILSSON TH.1979; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 41-48; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS DURATION ON PERCEPTUAL LATENCY IN THE FOVEA.LEWIS JH; MATTESON HH; DUNLAP WP et al.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 176-178; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

TEMPORAL SUMMATION OF THE HUMAN ACOUSTIC REFLEX. I: VARIABILITIESGOODMAN AC; RICHARDS AM.1977; J. AUDIT. RES.; USA; DA. 1977 PUBL. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 3; PP. 191-203; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

PERCEPTION D'UNE SUCCESSION RYTHMIQUEMALINNIKOVA TG.1980; FIZIOL. ZH. S.S.S.R.; SUN; DA. 1980; VOL. 66; NO 1; PP. 152-158; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

FLICKER SENSITIVITY MEASURED WITH INTERMITTENT STIMULI. I: INFLUENCE OF THE STIMULUS DURATION ON THE FLICKER THRESHOLDVAN DER WILDT GJ; RIJSDIJK JP.1979; J. OPT. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 69; NO 5; PP. 660-665; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

FLICKER SENSITIVITY MEASURED WITH INTERMITTENT STIMULI. II: COMPARISON BETWEEN TEMPORAL GRADIENT DETECTION AND THE "DE LANGE" CURVESVAN DER WILDT GJ; RIJSDIJK JP.1979; J. OPT. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 69; NO 5; PP. 666-669; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

BACKWARD MASKEIRG IN JUDGMENTS OF DURATION.ALLAN LG; ROUSSEAU R.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 5; PP. 482-486; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF FLICKER ADAPTATION UPON TEMPORAL CONTRAST ENHANCEMENTKITTERLE FL; BEARD BL.1983; PERCEPTION AND PSYCHOPHYSICS; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 33; NO 1; PP. 75-78; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

LONDNESS OF TONE PULSES IN A FREE FIELDPOULSEN T.1981; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 69; NO 6; PP. 1786-1790; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

PSYCHAPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF DISPLACEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR MOVING TARGETSSCOBEY RP; JOHNSON CA.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 49-55; BIBL. 18 REF.Conference Paper

A THEORETICAL NOTE ON TIME PERCEPTIONHOGAN HW.1978; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1338; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

PERCEIVED BRIGHTNESS AS A FUNCTION OF FLASH DURATION IN THE PERIPHERAL VISUAL FIELD.OSAKA N.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 63-69; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

TEMPORAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM.KING SMITH PE; RIGGS LA; MOORE RK et al.1977; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 17; NO 9; PP. 1101-1106; BIBL. 43 REF.Article

DURATION AND DIRECTION OF OPTOKINETIC AFTER-NYSTAGMUS AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS EXPOSURE TIME IN THE MONKEY.BUTTNER U; WAESPE W; HENN V et al.1976; ARCH. PSYCHIATR. NERVENKRANKH.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 222; NO 4; PP. 281-291; ABS. ALLEM.; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ACCURACY OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA WITH WHOLE INTERVAL, PARTIAL INTERVAL, AND MOMENTARY TIME-SAMPLING RECORDING TECHNIQUESGREEN SB; MCCOY JF; BURNS KP et al.1982; JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; ISSN 0164-0305; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 103-118; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

APPLICABILITY OF THE PARALLEL-CLOCK MODEL TO DURATION DISCRIMINATIONEISLER H.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 3; PP. 225-233; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

  • Page / 59