MONOTIC AND DICHOPTIC SIGNALS DO NOT COOPERATE IN THE PERCEPTION OF A BISTABLE MOTION DISPLAYGERBINO W.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 79-87; BIBL. 11 REF.Conference Paper

PERCEIVING THE CENTRAID OF CURVILINEARLY BOUNDED ROLLING SHAPESPROFFITT DR; CUTTING JE.1980; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 28; NO 5; PP. 484-487; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

PRESERVATION AND CHANGE OF HUE, BRIGHTNESS, AND FORM IN APPARENT MOTIONNAVON D.1983; BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 131-134; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF STIMULUS MOVEMENT PATTERNS IN THE PREY CATCHING BEHAVIOR OF HYDROMANTES GENEI (AMPHIBIA, PLETHODONTIDAE).ROTH G.1978; J. COMP. PHYSIOL.; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 123; NO 3; PP. 261-264; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

MOTION PERCEPTION. PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE SYMPOSIUM ON THE STUDY OF MOTION PERCEPTION, RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND APPLICATIONS, VELDHOVEN, THE NETHERLANDS, AUGUST 1980WERTHEIM AH ED; BOUMA H ED; WAGENAAR WA ED et al.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; 341 P.; BIBL. DISSEM.Conference Paper

SLOW-MOVEMENT SENSITIVITY IN THE HUMAN FIELD OF VISIONCHOUDHURY BP; CROSSEY AD.1981; PHYSIOL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 26; NO 1; PP. 125-128; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

BEWEGUNGSWAHRNEHMUNG: NEUERE UNTERSUCHUNGSASPEKTE. = PERCEPTION DE MOUVEMENT: NOUVEAUX ASPECTS DE LA RECHERCHERITTER M.1978; PSYCHOL. RDSCH.; DTSCH.; DA. 1978; VOL. 29; NO 2; PP. 123-139; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 3 P.Article

MOTION PARALLAX IN THE PERCEPTION OF MOVEMENT BY A MOVING SUBJECTGOODSON FE; SNIDER TQ; SWEARINGEN JE et al.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 87-88; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

A MODEL OF PERCEIVED DIRECTION OF ADAPTED MOTION.CHUN CHIANG.1977; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1977; VOL. 19; NO 4; PP. 184-186; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

DIVERGENCE THRESHOLDS AS FUNCTIONS OF TEMPORAL SEPARATION, SPATIAL SEPARATION, AND RETINAL LOCUSDI ORIO MJ; HARRINGTON TL.1983; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 56; NO 2; PP. 459-468; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

AGE, SEX AND TIME OF DAY EFFECTS ON THE DURATION OF THE MOVEMENT AFTER-EFFECTHARRIS JP.1983; BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0007-1269; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 74; NO 2; PP. 233-238; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE ORIGIN OF PATTERN INFORMATION OF AN APPARENTLY MOVING OBJECT DURING STROBOSCOPIC MOTIONVON GRUNAU MW.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 357-361; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE PERCEPTUAL COHERENCE OF MOVING VISUAL PATTERNSLAPPIN JS; KOTTAS BL.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 163-174; BIBL. 9 REF.Conference Paper

THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ORGANISATION OF MOTION PERCEPTION UNITS IN HUMAN VISIONBARBUR JL; HOLLIDAY IE; RUDDOCK KH et al.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 35-47; BIBL. 2 P.Conference Paper

VERNIER ACUITY AND STEREAPSIS WITH DISCONTINUOUSLY MOVING STIMULIMORGAN MJ.1981; ACT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 1-3; PP. 57-67; BIBL. 19 REF.Conference Paper

A NOTE ON "OPTICAL MOTIONS AS INFORMATION FOR UNSIGNED DEPTHPRAZDANY K.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 286-289; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

SUBJECTIVE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS AND THE PERCEPTION OF MOTION.CAELLI T; HOFFMAN W; LINDMAN H et al.1978; J. OPT. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 68; NO 3; PP. 402-411; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

INDEPENDENT MOTION INDUCTION IN SEPARATED PORTIONS OF THE VISUAL FIELD.GOGEL WC.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 10; NO 5; PP. 408-410; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SPATIO-TEMPORAL PROBING OF APPARENT ROTATIONAL MOVEMENT.ROBINS C; SHEPARD RN.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 12-18; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A MULTISTABLE MOVEMENT DISPLAY: EVIDENCE FOR TWO SEPARATE MOTION SYSTEMS IN HUMAN VISION.PANTLE A; PICCIANO L.1976; SCIENCE; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 193; NO 4252; PP. 500-502; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

VELOCITY AFTER-EFFECTS: THE EFFECTS OF ADAPTATION TO MOVING STIMULI ON THE PERCEPTION OF SUBSEQUENTLY SEEN MOVING STIMULITHOMPSON P.1981; VIS. RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 337-345; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

VISUAL INFORMATION ABOUT MOVING OBJECTSTODD JT.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 795-810; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS TO KINETIC STIMULUS TRANSFORMATIONSROCK I; SMITH D.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 19-29; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

A TEST OF FITTS' LAW WITH MOVING TARGETSJAGACINSKI RJ; REPPERGER DW; WARD SL et al.1980; HUM. FACTORS; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 225-233; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ATTENTION DEMANDS OF MOVEMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF THEIR DURATION AND VELOCITYNEWELL KM; HOSHIZAKI LEF.1980; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 1; PP. 59-69; BIBL. 16 REF.Article