REMARKS ON THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS: THE EFFECT OF NON-NORMALITY IN THURSTONE'S COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT MODELSUBKOVIAK MJ.1974; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 34; NO 4; PP. 829-835; BIBL. 8REF.Article

JUDGMENTS OF SLOP VARIABILITY IN VISUAL PATTERNS = ESTIMATIONS DE LA VARIABILITE DE LA PENTE DANS LES STRUCTURES VISUELLESANDERSON NS; ROSENFELD A.1972; PSYCHON. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 29; NO 4A; PP. 216-218; BIBL. 8REF.Article

A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING ANALYSIS OF 16 COMPLEX SOUNDS.HOWARD JH JR; SILVERMAN EB.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 193-200; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

WHEN ITEM RECOGNITION AND VISUAL SEARCH FUNCTIONS ARE SIMILAR = QUAND IL Y A SIMILITUDE ENTRE LES FONCTIONS RECONNAISSANCE DE L'ITEM ET RECHERCHE VISUELLEKRISTOFFERSON MW.1972; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 379-384; BIBL. 9REF.Article

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY NEGATIVE INCENTIVE CONSTRAST IN DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING = CONTRASTE DE MOTIVATION NEGATIF PRIMAIRE ET SECONDAIRE DANS LE CONDITIONNEMENT DIFFERENTIELCHECHILE R; FOWLER H.1973; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 97; NO 2; PP. 189-197; BIBL. 22REF.Article

SOMIGLIANZA INTRASERIALE ED APPRENDIMENTO INCIDENTALE = RESSEMBLANCE ENTRE SERIES ET APPRENTISSAGE LATENTMEAZZINI P.1972; RIV. PSICOL.; ITAL.; DA. 1972; VOL. 66; NO 3-4; PP. 153-168; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 19REF.Article

THE ADDITIVE DIFFERENCE MODEL AND A METRIC AND AN ORDERING ON SETSBECKER J; PIPAHL W.1974; PSYCHOMETRIKA; E.U.; DA. 1974; VOL. 39; NO 3; PP. 361-362; BIBL. 5REF.Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS SIMILARITY AND RESPONSE CRITERION ON SUCCESSIVE DISCRIMINATION REVERSAL LEARNING = EFFETS DE LA SIMILITUDE DU STIMULUS ET DU CRITERE DE LA REPONSE SUR L'APPRENTISSAGE INVERSE DE DISCRIMINATIONS SUCCESSIVESMILLER JT; HANSEN G; THOMAS DR et al.1972; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 81; NO 8; PP. 434-440; BIBL. 11REF.Article

Similarities between odor mixtures with known componentsGREGSON, R. A. M.Perception & psychophysics. 1984, Vol 35, Num 1, pp 33-40, issn 0031-5117Article

LES PARAPHRASES: ETUDE SEMANTIQUE, LEUR ROLE DANS L'APPRENTISSAGE.VEZIN L.1976; ANNEE PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1976; VOL. 76; NO 1; PP. 177-197; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

NONSHOCK CONFINEMENT DURATION AND SHOCK- AND SAFEBOX SIMILARITY DURING ESCAPE TRAINING IN RATS.FRANCHINA JJ; SCHINDELE TE.1975; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 297-300; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

AU SUJET DE LA SIMILITUDE DES STRUCTURES DES IMAGESGANZEN VA; MARTISHYUS V YU.1975; UCHEN. ZAP. LENINGRAD. GOS. UNIV., PSIKHOL. NAUK; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1975; NO 6; PP. 24-30; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

AUDITIVE ATTRIBUTE UND PHONETISCHE AEHNLICHKEIT. UNTERSUCHUNGEN MIT DEM EINDRUCKSDIFFERENTIAL AN SYNTHETISIERTEN VOKALKLANGEN = ATTRIBUT AUDITIF ET SIMILITUDE PHONETIQUE. RECHERCHES AU MOYEN DE LA TECHNIQUE DIFFERENTIELLE D'IMPRESSION SUR LES SONS VOCAUX SYNTHETISESJERRENTRUP A; THUERMANN E.1974; Z. PHONET. SPRACHWISSENSCH. KOMMUNIK.-FORSCH.; DTSCH.; DA. 1974; VOL. 27; NO 5; PP. 392-413; BIBL. 2P.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF THE SIMILARITY OF RETRIEVED RESPONSE TENDENCIES ON THE ABILITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY INITIATE AND/OR SUPPRESS OUTPUTSBUCKOLZ E.1982; ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 52; NO 1-2; PP. 1-21; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

TWIN-FLASH RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF FLASH DIAMETERMEIJER JG; VAN DER WILDT GJ; VAN DEN BRINK G et al.1978; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 18; NO 9; PP. 1111-1116; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

DIE MESSUNG DER ASSOZIATIVEN BEDEUTUNGSAEHNLICHKEIT. = LA MESURE DE LA SIMILITUDE DE SIGNIFICATION ASSOCIATIVEMARX W.1976; Z. EXPER. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 62-76; ABS. ANGL. FR.; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

DURATION-INTENSITY RECIPROCITY FOR EQUAL LOUDNESS = RECIPROCITE DUREE-INTENSITE POUR UNE EGALE FORCEMCFADDEN D.1975; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 57; NO 3; PP. 702-704; BIBL. 6REFArticle

JUGEMENTS DE SIMILARITE DE PATTERNS SELON LES STRUCTURES DE TRANSFORMATION INTER-PATTERNS PERCUESITO S.1975; JAP. J. PSYCHOL.; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 46; NO 1; PP. 10-18; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 14REFArticle

INTERFERENCE PRODUCED BY PHONETIC SIMILARITIES: STIMULUS RECOGNITION, ASSOCIATIVE RETRIEVAL, OR BOTH. = L'INTERFERENCE PRODUITE PAR LES SIMILITUDES PHONETIQUES EST-ELLE DUE A LA RECONNAISSANCE DU STIMULUS ET (OU) LA RECUPERATION ASSOCIATIVE.NELSON DL; BORDEN RC.1973; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 97; NO 2; PP. 167-169; BIBL. 10REF.Article

EFFECT OF EGO-INVOLVEMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND INTRALIST SIMILARITY ON STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ERRORS IN PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING = EFFET DES CONSIGNES DE L'IMPLICATION PERSONNELLE ET DE LA SIMILITUDE DES STIMULI SUR LES ERREURS DE GENERALISATION DU STIMULUS DANS L'APPRENTISSAGE DE PAIRES ASSOCIEESFERGUSON ED.1972; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 243-248; BIBL. 19REF.Article

STIMULUS DIMENSIONS OR STIMULUS ASPECTS. A COMPARISON OF BOTH CONCEPTS BY MEANS OF SIMILARITY JUDGMENTSBECKER J.1980; PSYCHOL. RES.; ISSN 0340-0727; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 42; NO 3; PP. 227-240; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

SUBJECTIVE MAGNITUDE INFORMATION IN SEMANTIC ORDERINGS.HOLYOAK K; WALKER JH.1976; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB., BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 15; NO 3; PP. 287-299; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

NEGATIVE SIMILARITIES.LUNDBERG U; DEVINE B.1975; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 35; NO 4; PP. 797-807; BIBL. 1 P.Article

RATED FUNNINESS AND DISSIMILARITY OF FIGURES. DIVERGENCE FROM EXPECTANCYNERHARDT G.1975; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWED.; DA. 1975; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 156-166; BIBL. 6REFArticle

CLASS STRUCTURE IN THE BIASING OF PERCEIVED PATTERN SIMILARITYAIKEN LS; FENKER RM; EVANS SH et al.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 3; PP. 489-501; BIBL. 24REF.Article