EQUITABLE SALARY INCREASE JUDGMENTS BASED UPON MERIT AND NON-MERIT CONSIDERATIONS: A CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARISONALEXANDER RA; BARRETT G.1982; REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE; ISSN 0035-340X; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 4; PP. 443-454; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 2 P.Article

MEASUREMENT OF JOB AND WORK INVOLVEMENTKANUNGO RN.1982; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 67; NO 3; PP. 341-349; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE MODERATING EFFECT OF SITUATIONAL CONTROL OF PERFORMANCE VARIANCE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND PERFORMANCEPETERS LH; FISHER CD; O'CONNOR EJ et al.1982; PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0031-5826; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 3; PP. 609-621; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

THE PROBLEM OF PROFESSIONAL INCOMPETENCECLAIBORN WL.1982; PROF. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0033-0175; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 153-158; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SIZE AND PERFORMANCE OF MAIL SORTING OFFICESSMYTH DS.1982; HUM. RELAT. (N. Y.); ISSN 0018-7267; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 7; PP. 567-586; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A NOTE ON SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE APTITUDE REQUIREMENTS AND REWARD ATTRIBUTES OF TASKSSCHNEIDER B; REICHERS AE; MITCHELL TM et al.1982; ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (EUGENE); ISSN 0001-4273; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 567-574; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A NOTE ON JOG TYPE AND APPLICANT RACE AS DETERMINANTS OF HIRING DECISIONSTERPSTRA DE; LARSEN JM JR.1980; J. OCCUP. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 53; NO 2; PP. 117-119; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INDIVIDUAL VERSUS SYSTEMS REWARDS: WHO'S DISSATISFIED, WHY, AND WHAT IS THEIR LIKELY RESPONSE.BAIRD LS; HAMNER WC.1979; ACAD. MANAG. J.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 783-792; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

SELF-PERCEIVED TASK-RELEVANT ABILITIES, RATED JOB PERFORMANCE, AND COMPLAINING BEHAVIOR OF JUNIOR EMPLOYEES IN A GOVERNMENT MINISTRYEKPO UFOT A.1979; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 64; NO 4; PP. 429-434; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

RELATIONSHIPS OF PERCEIVED JOB DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS TO JOB ABILITY REQUIREMENTS AND JOB VALUE.DUNHAM RB.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 6; PP. 760-763; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

STABILITE DE LA PERCEPTION DU TEMPS EN TANT QU'UN DES CRITERES DE L'ESTIMATION DE L'APTITUDE AU TRAVAIL DES OPERATEURSMEDVEDEV VI; BAGROVA ND.1977; FIZIOL. CHELOVEKA; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1977; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 288-294; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

RESIDENT SELECTION: APPLICANT SELECTION CRITERIA COMPARED WITH PERFORMANCEERLANDSON EE; CALHOUN JG; BARRACK FM et al.1982; SURGERY; ISSN 0039-6060; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 92; NO 2; PP. 270-275; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

LA DYNAMIQUE DE L'APTITUDE AU TRAVAIL PHYSIQUE CHEZ DES ELEVES DE L'ECOLE AUXILIAIRESHARIPOVA DD; GORDIENKO EA; SADYKOVA GA et al.1982; DEFEKTOLOGIJA; ISSN 0130-3074; SUN; DA. 1982; NO 2; PP. 18-22Article

FORMAT AND TRAINING EFFECTS ON RATING ACCURACY AND RATER ERRORSBORMAN WC.1979; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 64; NO 4; PP. 410-421; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

DE COMPETENTIE VAN JONGE ONTWIKKELINGSPSYCHOLOGEN = COMPETENCE PROFESSIONNELLE DES JEUNES PSYCHOLOGUES DU DEVELOPPEMENTKOHNSTAMM GA.1978; NEDERL. T. PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1978; VOL. 33; NO 8; PP. 513-522; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL - A SURVEY OF CURRENT PRACTICES.LOCHER AH; TEEL KS.1977; PERSONNEL J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 56; NO 5; PP. 245-254 (4P.); BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A STUDY OF TASK-GOAL ATTRIBUTES, HIGHER ORDER NEED STRENGTH, AND PERFORMANCE.IVANCEVICH JM; MCMAHON JT.1977; ACAD. MANAG. J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 552-563; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

ORGANIZATION AND RATER DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE APPRAISALSZAMMUTO RF; LONDON M; ROWLAND KM et al.1982; PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0031-5826; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 3; PP. 643-658; BIBL. 1 P.Article

A TEST OF THE SELF-CONSISTENCY THEORY OF THE JOB PERFORMANCE, JOB SATISFACTION RELATIONSHIPLOPEZ EM.1982; ACAD. MANAGE J. (EUGENE); ISSN 0001-4273; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 335-348; BIBL. 3 P.Article

A CRITIQUE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS: MANY SYSTEMS ARE POORLY DESIGNED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF CLEAR OBJECTIVESYAGER E.1981; PERS. J.; ISSN 0031-5745; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 60; NO 2; PP. 129-133Article

PAST AND CURRENT TRENDS IN NEGLIGENCE AND INCOMPETENCE ARBITRATION. INSTEAD OF WORKING AGAINST THE LABOR CONTRACT, MANAGEMENT IS NOW WORKING WITH ITWHITE GS.1979; PERSONNEL J.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 58; NO 11; PP. 795-801; BIBL. 50 REF.Article

OUTPUT RATES AMONG INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES.ROTHE HF.1978; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 63; NO 1; PP. 40-46; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

CAUSAL INFERENCES IN MOTIVATION RESEARCH: A REINTERPRETATION OF RESULTS FROM PANEL STUDIES.SHERIDAN JE; SLOCUM JW JR.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 4; PP. 510-513; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

SOME FACTORS RELATED TO STUDENT TEACHER CLASSROOM PERFORMANCE FOLLOWING MICROTEACHING TRAINING.COPELAND WD.1977; AMER. EDUC. RES. J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 147-157; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

VALIDATION AND EXTENSION OF AN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES MODEL OF WORK PERFORMANCE.TERBORG JR.1977; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 188-216; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article