Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats : a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacyRICHARDSON, N. R; ROBERTS, D. C. S.Journal of neuroscience methods. 1996, Vol 66, Num 1, pp 1-12, issn 0165-0270, 11 p.Article

Pausing under variable-ratio schedules: interaction of reinforcer magnitude, variable-ratio size, and lowest ratioSCHLINGER, H; BLAKELY, E; KACZOR, T et al.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior. 1990, Vol 53, Num 1, pp 133-139, issn 0022-5002, 7 p.Article

SUCCESSIVE INCENSIVE SHIFTS WITH IMMATURE AND MATURE RATS = MODIFICATIONS SUCCESSIVES DU RENFORCEMENT CHEZ LE RAT JEUNE ET ADULTESAYEED H; WOLACH AH.1972; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1972; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 54-60; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

AN INEXPENSIVE DEVICE FOR PROGRAMMING RATIO REINFORCEMENT = UNE TECHNIQUE PEU COUTEUSE POUR LA PROGRAMMATION DU TAUX DE RENFORCEMENTKAUFFMAN JM; CULLIMAN D; SCRANTON TR et al.1972; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 543-544; BIBL. 3REF.Article

SALIENCE OF INITIAL ATTITUDE, MAGNITUDE OF INCENTIVE, AND ATTITUDE CHANGE IN A FORCED COMPLIANCE PARADIGM.TOUHEY JC.1976; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 118-122; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

SHIFTS IN MAGNITUDE OF DELAYED AND IMMEDIATE REWARD.COX WM; BLACK RW.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 35-38; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

WITHIN-SUBJECTS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONTRAST EFFECTS IN RATSFLAHERTY CF; LARGEN J.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 653-664; BIBL. 22REFArticle

CONTRASTAS A FUNCTION OF COMPONENT DURATIONSHIMP CP; MENLOVE RL.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 193-194; BIBL. 10REF.Article

RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE DENSITY OF REINFORCEMENT AS FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PEAK SHIFTWHEATLEY KL; THOMAS DR.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 409-418; BIBL. 10REF.Article

BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST IN A SECOND-ORDER MULTIPLE SEHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENTBILBREY J; WINOKUR S.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 206-208; BIBL. 8REF.Article

AFTER EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT ON VARIABLE-RATIO SCHEDULES.PRIDDLE HIGSON PJ; LOWE CF; HARZEM P et al.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 347-354; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

CHOICE AND SELF-CONTROL IN CHILDREN: A TEST OF RACHLIN'S MODEL = CHOIX ET AUTO-CONTROLE CHEZ LES ENFANTS: UN TEST DU MODELE DE RACHLINBURNS DJ; POWERS RB.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 156-158; BIBL. 3REFArticle

EFFECTS OF DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT AND INCENTIVE VALUE ON CHILDREN'S LEVER PULLING RESPONSE.SHIROIWA Y.1975; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 17-24; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMBINATIONS OF RESPONSE-REINFORCER DEPENDANCE AND INDEPENDANCE = COMBINAISONS DE LA DEPENDANCE ET DE L'INDEPENDANCE RENFORCEMENT-REPONSELATTAL KA.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 357-362; BIBL. 10REF.Article

THE ROLE OF LOCAL INTERACTIONS IN BEHAVIORAL CONTRASTWILLIAMS BA.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 543-545; BIBL. 11REFArticle

AN INCENTIVE EFFECT IN THERMALLY MOTIVATED BEHAVIORMATTHEWS JJ; PINSKY SD; STRAX R et al.1974; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 173-176; BIBL. 15REF.Article

INTERTRIAL DELAYS AND START BOX CUES IN DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING WITH GOLDFISH (CARASSIUS NAURATUS).VAN BERSCHOT SN; WOLACH AH.1976; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 94; NO 2; PP. 275-283; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERING TYPE AND MAGNITUDE OF REWARD ON THE CONTRAFREELOADING PHENOMENON IN RATS.ROBERTSON LC; ANDERSON SC.1975; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 325-328; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE ON INTERVAL AND RATIO SCHEDULESLOWE CF; DAVEY GCL; HARZEM P et al.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 553-560; BIBL. 25REF.Article

REWARD SHIFT EFFECTS IN DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONINGMCHEWITT ER.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 4; PP. 646-651; BIBL. 10REF.Article

VARIED REWARD MAGNITUDE EFFECTS IN THE RAT: PATTERNING AND RESISTANCE TO EXTINCTION = EFFETS DE L'IMPORTANCE DE LA VARIABILITE DU RENFORCEMENT CHEZ LE RAT: STRUCTURE DE L'ACQUISITION ET RESISTANCE A L'EXTINCTIONCRUMBAUGH CM; CAMPBELL PE; FILE PE et al.1973; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 255-260; BIBL. 14REF.Article

NEGATIVE S- CONTRAST WITH MINIMAL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS IN S+WERK S; MCHOSE JH.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 25-27; BIBL. 6REF.Article

POSITIVE CONTRAST OBTAINED IN RATS FOLLOWING A SHIFT IN SCHEDULE, DELAY, AND MAGNITUDE OF REWARD = CONTRASTE POSITIF OBTENU CHEZ DES RATS SUIVANT UN CHANGEMENT DANS LE PROGRAMME, DELAI ET IMPORTANCE DU RENFORCEMENTSHANAB ME; CAVALLARO G.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 109-112; BIBL. 15REFArticle

RUNWAY PERFORMANCE OF NORMAL, SHAM, AND ANOSMIC RATS AS A FUNCTION OF MAGNITUDE OF REWARD AND MAGNITUDE SHIFT.DAVIS SF; HARPER WE.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 4A; PP. 367-369; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SHIFTS IN MAGNITUDE OF REWARD WITH HUMANS IN THE "STRAIGHTAWAY".COX WM; WEITZ JR; LIEBERMAN LR et al.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 1-3; BIBL. 7 REF.Article