ON THE AMBIGUITY OF VISUAL STIMULATION. A REPLY TO ERIKSSONROSINSKI RR.1974; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 259-263; BIBL. 22REF.Article

CROSS-MODALITY SET EFFECT ON THE PERCEPTION OF AMBIGUOUS PICTURES. = EFFET D'UN GROUPEMENT TRANSMODALITE SUR LA PERCEPTION D'IMAGES AMBIGUESAN YEN LUI.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 331-333; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A MEASURE OF NEEDS TO ASSESS THE STIMULUS CHARACTERISTICS OF TAT CARDS.CAMPUS N.1976; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 248-258; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

THE FIRST GLIMPSE DETERMINES THE PERCEPTION OF AN AMBIGUOUS FIGURECHASTAIN G; BURNAHM CA.1975; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 3; PP. 221-224; BIBL. 8REF.Article

LA SPECIFICITE DANS L'APPRENTISSAGE ET LA MEMORISATION DE PHRASESDEGOUYS J.1975; ANNEE PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1975; VOL. 75; NO 1; PP. 87-96; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 6REFArticle

AMBIGUOUS EDGE DETECTION LEADS TO SUBJECTIVE CONTOURSDAVIS SJ; JERNIGAN ME.1982; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 93-94; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN AMBIGUOUS-FIGURE PERCEPTION: AN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS.FORSYTH GA; HUBER RJ.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 6; PP. 498-500; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

METHODS & DESIGNS. LEXICAL AMBIGUITY OF WORDS USED IN ENGLISH TEXT.BRITTON BK.1978; BAHAV. RES. METHODS INSTRUMENT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 1-7; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

ON THE NOTIONS OF AMBIGUITY AND INFORMATION LOSS.DOLBY JL.1977; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 290-298; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL RATINGS OF IMPOVERISHED STIMULI: A REPLICATIONBLACK HK.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 81-83; BIBL. 6REF.Article

COMMENTS ON THE USE OF PERCEPTUALLY AMBIGUOUS FIGURES AS MCCOLLOUGH-EFFECT STIMULIBROERSE J; CRASSINI B.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 399-402; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

TRIGGERING A SCHEMA: THE ROLE OF ITALICS AND INTONATION IN THE INTERPRETATION OF AMBIGUOUS DISCOURSEPRATT MW; KRANE R; KENDALL JR et al.1981; AM. EDUC. RES. J.; ISSN 0002-8312; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 303-315; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

RELIABILITY OF REVERSAL RATES AS A MEASURE OF PERCEPTUAL STABILITYBERGUM JE; BERGUM BO.1980; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1038; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

AN INVARIANT FOR WHEEL-GENERATED MOTIONS AND THE LOGIC OF ITS DETERMINATIONPROFFITT DR; CUTTING JE.1980; PERCEPTION; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 435-449; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

NIVEAU RELATIF DE POLYSEMIE DE 50 ADJECTIFS QUALIFICATIFS.LAMARCHE L.1977; CANAD. J. BEHAV. SCI.; CANADA; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 1; PP. 59-67; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

A NOTE ON "GRAPHONYMS".SOMMER R.1977; AMER. J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 90; NO 3; PP. 527-528; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

THE THREE FACES OF INTOLERANCE OF AMBIGUITY. = LES TROIS FACETTES DE L'INTOLERANCE DE L'AMBIGUITEKREITLER S; MAGUEN T; KREITLER H et al.1976; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 127; NO 3-4; PP. 238-250; ABS. ALLEM.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

EQUIVOCAL MESSAGES IN ORGANIZATIONPUTNAM LL; SORENSON RL.1982; HUM. COMMUN. RES.; ISSN 0360-3989; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 114-132; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE ADVANCEMENT OF CHILDREN'S VERBAL REFERENTIAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS: THE ROLE OF METACOGNITIVE GUIDANCEROBINSON EJ; ROBINSON WP.1982; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT; ISSN 0165-0254; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 329-355; BIBL. 2 P.Article

UNCERTAINTY AND PREFERENCE FOR "AMBIGUOUS" FIGURES, "IMPOSSIBLE" FIGURES AND THE DRAWINGS OF M.C. ESCHERNICKI RM; FORESTELL P; SHORT P et al.1979; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1979; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 277-281; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

ANHEDONIA AS A FUNCTION OF NON-AFFECTIVE INTERPRETATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIMULI AND THRESHOLD FOR AFFECTIVE AND NEUTRAL STIMULI.WATSON CG.1977; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 1; PP. 58-63; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

DISAMBIGUATION OF DITROPIC SENTENCES: ACOUSTIC AND PHONETIC CUESVAN LANCKER D; CANTER GJ; TERBEEK D et al.1981; J. SPEECH HEAR. RES.; ISSN 0022-4685; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 330-335; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

IDIOMATIC VERSUS LITERAL INTERPRETATIONS OF DITROPICALLY AMBIGUOUS SENTENCESVAN LANCKER D; CANTER GJ.1981; J. SPEECH HEAR. RES.; ISSN 0022-4685; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 64-69; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

DES HYPOTHESES SUR L'ACTIVITE DU LOCUTEUR. L'AMBIGUITE ET LA FONCTION DE CERTAINES QUESTIONS EN "POURQUOI ... NE PAS".MILNER J.1977; J. PSYCHOL. NORM. PATHOL.; FR.; DA. 1977; VOL. 74; NO 2; PP. 227-242; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ORDER EFFECTS AND DISPLAY PERSISTENCE IN PROBABILISTIC OPINION REVISIONEDENBOROUGH RA.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 39-40; BIBL. 8REF.Article