IRRATIONAL ATTRIBUTIONS OF RESPONSIBILITY: WHO, WHAT, WHEN AND WHYSADOW D.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 52; NO 2; PP. 403-406; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE STRUCTURE OF ATTRIBUTIONYARKIN KL; HARVEY JH.1982; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 117; NO 2; PP. 311-312; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

PERSONALISM AND DISTINCTIVENESSENZLE ME; HARVEY MD; WRIGHT EF et al.1980; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 39; NO 4; PP. 542-552; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION AND LIFE-THREATENING DISEASENUMMA C; MCCORKLE R.1982; INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE; ISSN 0091-2174; USA; DA. 1982-1983; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 311-319; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DEPRESSIVE ATTRIBUTIONAL STYLE AND DEPRESSION FOLLOWING CHILDBIRTHMANLY PC; MACMAHON RJ; BRADLEY CF et al.1982; J. ABNORM. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-843X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 91; NO 4; PP. 245-254; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

SELF-SERVING BIASES IN ATTRIBUTION: A BAYESIAN ANALYSISWETZEL CG.1982; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 43; NO 2; PP. 197-209; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

DIE GENAUIGKEIT DER INFORMATIONSBEWERTUNG IM RAHMEN EINES MODIFIZIERTEN ATTRIBUTIONSWUERFELS = PRECISION D'EVALUATION DES INFORMATIONS DANS LA MESURE D'UN "CUBE D'ATTRIBUTION" MODIFIEHAISCH J.1982; PSYCHOL. BEITR.; ISSN 0033-3018; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 24; NO 1; PP. 26-38; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF SELF-EFFACING ATTRIBUTIONS: THE CHINESE CASEBOND MH; KWOK LEUNG; KWOK CHOI WAN et al.1982; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 118; NO 2; PP. 157-166; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

ATTRIBUTION AND RECONSTRUCTIVE MEMORYWELLS GL.1982; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 5; PP. 447-463; BIBL. 2 P.Article

SEX DIFFERENCES IN ATTRIBUTION: A NORWEGIAN STUDYSAGATUN IJ.1981; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0036-5564; SWE; DA. 1981; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 51-57; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF THE LABELS "MENTALLY RETARDED" AND "RETARD" ON THE SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF MENTALLY RETARDED CHILDRENSIPERSTEIN GN; BUDOFF M; BAK JJ et al.1980; AMER. J. MENTAL DEFIC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 84; NO 6; PP. 596-601; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

EXTENSION OF THE KELLEY ATTRIBUTION MODEL: THE ROLE OF COMPARISON-OBJECT CONSENSUS TARGET-OBJECT CONSENSUS, DISTINCTIVENESS, AND CONSISTENCYPRUITT DJ; INSKO CA.1980; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 39-58; BIBL. 36 REF.Article

DECRET NO 79-460 DU 11 JUIN 1979 PORTANT TRANSFERT D'ATTRIBUTIONS DU MINISTRE DES TRANSPORTS AU MINISTRE DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT ET DU CADRE DE VIE1979; J. OFF., LOIS DECRETS; FRA; DA. 1979; NO 135; PP. 1399Article

NAIVE ATTRIBUTORS' ATTRIBUTIONS AND PREDICTIONS: WHAT IS INFORMATIVE AND WHEN IS AN EFFECT AN EFFECT.WELLS GL; HARVEY JH.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 36; NO 5; PP. 483-490; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ACTIONS AND OCCURRENCES IN KELLEY'S CUBE.ZUCKERMAN M.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 36; NO 6; PP. 647-656; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

ATTRIBUTIONAL ERROR AND ATTITUDES TOWARD AGING: A VIEW OF THE NCOA NATIONAL ATTITUDE SURVEYSHAVER KG.1978; INTERNATION. J. AGING HUM. DEVELOP.; USA; DA. 1978-1979; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 101-113; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

A RE-EXAMINATION OF THE ROLES OF CONSENSUS, CONSISTENCY AND DISTINCTIVENESS: KELLEY'S CUBE REVISITEDHEWSTONE M; JASPARS J.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 41-50; BIBL. 2 P.Article

MEERVOUDIGE GEDETERMINEERDHEID EN HET PROBLEEM VAN DE EENVOUDIGE THEORETISCHE SAMENHANG = DETERMINATION PLURIFACTORIELLE ET LE PROBLEME DE LA RELATION THEORIQUE SIMPLEBEIJK J.1981; NED. TIJDSCHR. PSYCHOL. HAAR GRENSGEB.; ISSN 0028-2235; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 36; NO 3; PP. 151-160; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

CAUSAL EXPLANATION, TELEOLOGICAL EXPLANATION: ON RADICAL PARTICULARISM IN ATTRIBUTION THEORYKRUGLANSKI AW.1979; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 37; NO 9; PP. 1447-1457; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

LOCUS OF CAUSALITY AND THE USE OF INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONSRUBLE DN; FELDMAN NS; HIGGINS ET et al.1979; J. PERSONALITY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 47; NO 4; PP. 595-614; BIBL. 3 P.Article

CONSISTENCY IN MARKED DIGRAPHSBEINEKE LW; HARARY F.1978; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 260-269; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

WAARDERINGSTHEORIE EN ATTRIBUTIETHEORIEEN: VERENIGBAAR. = THEORIE DE L'EVALUATION ET THEORIE DE L'ATTRIBUTION: SONT-ELLES CONCILIABLES.HOEKSTRA HA.1978; NEDERL. T. PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1978; VOL. 33; NO 7; PP. 463-471; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

DO PEOPLE USE CONSENSUS INFORMATION IN MAKING CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS.WELLS GL; HARVEY JH.1977; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 35; NO 5; PP. 279-293; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

PERSONAL AND SITUATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ATTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR AN ACCIDENT.SHAW JI; MCMARTIN JA.1977; HUM. RELAT.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 95-107; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS FOR BEHAVIORS CONSISTENT OR INCONSISTENT WITH AN ACTOR'S PERSONALITY TRAITS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THOSE OFFERED BY ACTORS AND OBSERVERSMONSON TC; HESLEY JW.1982; JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 5; PP. 416-432; BIBL. 2 P.Article