EFFECT OF PH ON BRONCHIAL RESPONSE TO INHALED HISTAMINECOCKCROFT DW; BERSCHEID BA.1982; THORAX; ISSN 0040-6376; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 37; NO 2; PP. 133-136; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

VOLUME ADJUSTMENT OF MAXIMAL MIDEXPIRATORY FLOW: IMPORTANCE OF CHANGES IN TOTAL LUNG CAPACITYCOCKEROFT DW; BERSCHEID BA.1980; CHEST; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 78; NO 4; PP. 595-600; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

STANDARDIZATION OF INHALATION PROVOCATION TESTS: DOSE VS CONCENTRATION OF HISTAMINECOCKCROFT DW; BERSCHEID BA.1982; CHEST; ISSN 0012-3692; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 82; NO 5; PP. 572-575; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

BRONCHIAL RESPONSE TO INHALED HISTAMINE IN ASYMPTOMATIC YOUNG SMOKERSCOCKCROFT DW; BERSCHEID BA; MURDOCK KY et al.1983; EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY DISEASES; ISSN 0106-4339; DNK; DA. 1983; VOL. 64; NO 3; PP. 207-211; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

UNIMODAL DISTRIBUTION OF BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS TO INHALED HISTAMINE IN A RANDOM HUMAN POPULATIONCOCKCROFT DW; BERSCHEID BA; MURDOCK KY et al.1983; CHEST; ISSN 0012-3692; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 83; NO 5; PP. 751-754; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INHALED SCH 1000, AND ANTICHOLINERGIC BRONCHODILATATORCOCKCROFT DW; COTTON DJ; BERSCHEID BA et al.1982; CURR. THER. RES.; ISSN 0011-393X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 138-147; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF BITOLTEROL MESYLATE AND METAPROTERENOL SULPHATECOCKCROFT DW; BERSCHEID BA; DOSMAN JA et al.1981; CURR. THER. RES.; ISSN 0011-393X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 5; PP. 817-824; BIBL. 25 REF.Article