REPLY TO LORR AND REANALYSISBLASHFIELD RK.1981; APPL. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0146-6216; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 75-76; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE USE OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL RESEARCHBLASHFIELD RK.1980; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 48; NO 4; PP. 456-459; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

THE CLASSIFICATION OF DEPRESSION THROUGH CLUSTER ANALYSISBLASHFIELD RK; MOREY LC.1979; COMPREHENS. PSYCHIATRY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 20; NO 6; PP. 516-527; BIBL. 61 REF.Article

EVALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR PSYCHIATRIC CLASSIFICATION.BLASHFIELD RK; DRAGUNS JG.1976; J. ABNORM. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 85; NO 2; PP. 140-150; BIBL. 2 P.Article

INCREASING THE IMPACT OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS RESEARCH: THE CASE OF PSYCHIATRIC CLASSIFICATIONSKINNER HA; BLASHFIELD RK.1982; J. CONSULT. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-006X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 5; PP. 727-735; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EMPIRICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF ALCOHOLISM: A REVIEWMOREY LC; BLASHFIELD RK.1981; J. STUD. ALCOHOL; ISSN 0096-882X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 42; NO 11; PP. 925-937; BIBL. 61 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF FOUR CLUSTERING METHODS USING MMPI MONTE CARLO DATABLASHFIELD RK; MOREY LC.1980; APPL. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 57-64; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PERFORMANCE OF A COMPOSITE AS A FUNCTION OF THE NUMBER OF JUDGES.LIBBY R; BLASHFIELD RK.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 121-129; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

FEIGHNER ET AL., INVISIBLE COLLEGES, AND THE MATTHEW EFFECTBLASHFIELD RK; GUZE SB; STRAUSS JS et al.1982; SCHIZOPHR. BULL.; ISSN 0586-7614; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 1-12; BIBL. DISSEM.Article