THE AMERICANIZATION OF THE BUREAUCRATIC ETHOS = L'AMERICANISATION DE L'ETHOS BUREAUCRATIQUESAVELLS J.1972; PERSONNEL J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 51; NO 11; PP. 835-839; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

BUREAUCRATIC MALADIES AND REMEDIESWEISS CH.1979; AMER. BEHAV. SCIENTIST.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 477-482; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

KNOWLEDGE GAPS, BUREAUCRACY, AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: TOWARDS ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION MODELSABRAHAMSON K.1982; COMMUNICATION; ISSN 0305-4233; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 75-102; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

BUREAUCRATIC AUTONOMY AND THE PUBLIC INTERESTROURKE FE.1979; AMER. BEHAV. SCIENTIST.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 537-546; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

TOWARD A CONTINGENCY THEORY FOR DESIGNING WORK ORGANIZATIONS.LANGDALE JA.1976; J. APPL. BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 199-214; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

ESSENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN BUREAUCRACY IN THE 1980SJAQUES E.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. SCI.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 439-447; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

CHANGES IN CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHTABERBACH JD.1979; AMER. BEHAV. SCIENTIST.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 493-515; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURE RECONSIDERED = RE-EXAMEN DE LA STRUCTURE BUREAUCRATIQUEISHERWOOD GB; HOY WK.1972; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 41; NO 1; PP. 47-50; BIBL. 13REF.Article

DECENTRALIZATION OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES: WHAT DOES IT ACCOMPLISH.YIN RK.1979; AMER. BEHAV. SCIENTIST.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 525-536; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

SOCIAL CONSTRAINT AS A DETERMINANT OF ATTITUDES TO FREEDOM.GIBBINS K.1976; AUSTRAL. J. PHYSIOL.; AUSTRAL.; DA. 1976; VOL. 28; NO 1; PP. 1-9; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

ZUR SOZIALEN ERWUENSCHTHEIT VON EIGENSCHAFTSBEZEICHNUNGEN. DATENVERGLEICHE: KOELN 1966, BOCHUM 1971, KOELN 1972. = LA DESIRABILITE SOCIALE DES TRAITS DE PERSONNALITE. COMPARAISON DE DATES: COLOGNE 1966 - BOCHUM 1971 - COLOGNE 1972LUCK HE; REGELMANN S; SCHON BACH P et al.1976; Z. EXPER. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 253-266; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

STRUCTURE OF ORGANIZATIONS IN OCCUPATIONAL INTEREST ASSOCIATIONS = LA STRUCTURE DES ORGANISATIONS DANS LES ASSOCIATIONS D'INTERET PROFESSIONNELDONALDSON L; WARNER M.1974; HUM. RELAT.; G.B.; DA. 1974; VOL. 27; NO 8; PP. 721-738; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

Predicaments of bureaucratic subordinacy: dramatic escape and compensationBAUM, H. S.Political psychology. 1985, Vol 6, Num 4, pp 681-703, issn 0162-895XArticle

Internships in an instant bureaucracy: some organizational lessonsMILLS, E; HARRIS, R. J; BRISCHETTO, R et al.The Journal of applied behavioral science. 1983, Vol 19, Num 4, pp 483-495, issn 0021-8863Article

ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES IN U.S. HEALTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: PARTICIPATION, DISCRETION, AND ACCOUNTABILITYMCLANAHAN SS.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. SCI.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 354-369; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE MANY PATHWAYS OF ACADEMIC COORDINATIONCLARK BR.1979; HIGHER EDUC.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 251-268; BIBL. 2 P.Article

BUREAUCRACY AND VENTURE FAILURES.HLAVACEK JD; THOMPSON VA.1978; ACAD. MANAG. REV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 242-248; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

The research imperative and bureaucratic control : the case of clinical researchHALL, D.Social science & medicine (1982). 1991, Vol 32, Num 3, pp 333-342, issn 0277-9536Article

DEALING WITH BUREAUCRACY: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT PERSUASIVE APPEALSWEIMANN G.1982; SOC. PSYCHOL. Q.; ISSN 0190-2725; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 45; NO 3; PP. 136-144; BIBL. 2 P.Article

PEOPLE, PRODUCTION, AND POWER. CONVERGING ISSUES IN URBAN STUDIESKASARDIA JD; LINEBERRY RL.1980; AM. BEHAV. SCI. (BEVERLY HILLS); ISSN 0097-6407; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 157-176; BIBL. 3 P.Article

BUILDING THE PARALLEL ORGANIZATION: CREATING MECHANISMS FOR PERMANENT QUALITY OF WORK LIFESTEIN BA; KANTER RM.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. SCI.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 371-388; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

BUREAUCRACY IN GREAT BRITAIN IN THE 1980SHARRIES JENKINS G.1980; J. APPL. BEHAV. SCI.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 317-335; BIBL. 2 P.Article

STRUCTURE IN ORGANIZATIONS: A RECONSIDERATION.BRYMAN A.1976; J. OCCUP. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 49; NO 1; PP. 1-9; BIBL. 38 REF.Article

JOB DESIGN AND WORKER SATISFACTION: A CHALLENGE TO ASSUMPTIONSBAKER SH; HANSEN RA.1975; J. OCCUP. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 79-91; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

INTEGRATIVE ARBEITSWISSENSCHAFT UND ARBEITSORGANISATION: EIN NACHTRAG ZUR ARBEITSSTRUKTURIERUNGSDISKUSSION ANGESICHTS DER NEUEREN ENTWICKLUNGEN IN DER BUEROARBEIT = ERGONOMIE INTEGRATIVE ET ORGANISATION DU TRAVAIL. APPENDICE A LA DISCUSSION SUR LA STRUCTURATION DU TRAVAIL TENANT COMPTE DES NOUVEAUX DEVELOPPEMENTS DANS LE TRAVAIL BUREAUCRATIQUEREICHWALD R.1982; ZEITSCHRIFT FUER ARBEITSWISSENSCHAFT; ISSN 0340-2444; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 36; NO 4; PP. 224-229; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 31 REF.Article