THE P CONTROL CHART UNDER INSPECTION ERRORCASE KE.1980; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 1-9; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

A WIDE VARIETY OF AOQ AND ATI PERFORMANCE MEASURES WITH AND WITHOUT INSPECTION ERRORBEAINY I; CASE KE.1981; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 1-9; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO MUNICIPAL NOISE CONTROLCASE KE; VENTRE GG.1972; C.R.C. CRIT. REV. ENVIRONMENT. CONTROL; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 3; NO 1; PP. 85-98; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

A MODERN APPROACH TO SAMPLING PLAN DESIGN AND EVALUATIONCASE KE; JONES LL.1979; COMPUTERS INDUSTR. ENGNG; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 251-259; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

SEQUENTIAL ATTRIBUTES SAMPLING: INSPECTION ERROR EFFECTS AND COMPENSATION.SAVANG KULAPATRAPA; CASE KE.1977; COMPUTERS INDUSTR. ENGNG; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 1; NO 4; PP. 235-253; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

ON THE SELECTION OF A PRIOR DISTRIBUTION IN BAYESIAN ACCEPTANCE SAMPLINGCASE KE; KEATS JB.1982; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; ISSN 0022-4065; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 10-18; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

A THREE ACTION COST MODEL FOR ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING BY VARIABLESSCHMIDT JW JR; BENNETT GK; CASE KE et al.1980; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 10-18; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL COST MODELALY AD; CASE KE; TURNER WC et al.1978; COMPUTERS INDUSTR. ENGNG; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 203-209; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

RATE OF RETURN: AN EXPLICIT REINVESTMENT RATE APPROACH.WHITE JA; CASE KE; AGEE MH et al.1976; IN: AM. INST. IND. ENG. SPRING ANNU. CONF. 27. PROC.; SAINT-LOUIS, MO.; 1976; ATLANTA; AM. INST. IND. ENG.; DA. 1976; PP. 47-53; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Conference Paper

THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF INSPECTOR ERROR ON ATTRIBUTE SAMPLING PLANS.BENNETT GK; CASE KE; SCHMIDT JW et al.1974; NAV. RES. LOGIST. QUART.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 431-443; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

INSPECTION ERROR AND ITS ADVERSE EFFECTS: A MODEL WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERSCOLLINS RD JR; CASE KE; BENNETT GK et al.1978; A.I.I.E. TRANS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 2-9; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF INSPECTION ERROR ON AVERAGE OUTGOING QUALITY.CASE KE; BENNETT GK; SCHMIDT JW et al.1975; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 28-33; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

BIAS AND IMPRECISION IN VARIABLES ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING EFFECTS AND COMPENSATION.WEN HAUR MEI; CASE KE; SCHMIDT JW et al.1975; INTERNATION. J. PRODUCT. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 13; NO 4; PP. 327-340; ABS. FR. ALLEM.; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

A METHOD FOR COMPUTING COMPLEX SYSTEM RELIABILITYKIM YH; CASE KE; GHARE PM et al.1972; I.E.E.E. TRANS. RELIABIL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 215-219; BIBL. 14 REF.Serial Issue

A DISCRETE ECONOMIC MULTIATTRIBUTE ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING.CASE KE; SCHMIDT JW; BENNETT GK et al.1975; A.I.I.E. TRANS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 363-369Article

COST-BASED ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING = ECHANTILLONNAGE BASE SUR LE COUT POUR L'ACCEPTATION D'UN PRODUITCASE KE; SCHMIDT JW; BENNETT GK et al.1972; INDUSTR. ENGNG; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 4; NO 11; PP. 26-31; BIBL. 2 REF.Serial Issue