MASS COMMUNICATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL IMAGE CHANGE = LES COMMUNICATIONS DE MASSE ET LE CHANGEMENT DE L'IMAGE INTERNATIONALESMITH DD.1973; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 115-129; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

THE EFFECTS OF REASSURING RECOMMENDATIONS IN A FEAR-AROUSING SPEECH = LES EFFETS DE RECOMMANDATIONS RASSURANTES DANS UN DISCOURS SUSCITANT LA PEURCOPE F; RICHARDSON D.1972; SPEECH MONOGR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 148-150; BIBL. 3REF.Article

SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SOCIAL INFERENCE, COGNITIVE BALANCE, AND CHANGE IN IMPRESSION = QUELQUES RELATIONS ENTRE L'INFERENCE SOCIALE, LA BALANCE COGNITIVE ET LE CHANGEMENT D'OPINIONGOLLOB HF; FISCHER GW.1973; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 26; NO 1; PP. 16-22; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

EFFECTIVE AND INEXPENSIVE METHOD OF OBTAINING ATTITUDE AND OPINION DATA FROM "HARD TO SAMPLE" POPULATIONS.OWENS WH JR; CAPEL WC.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 3 PART. 1; PP. 751-754; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

CONTEXTUAL DETERMINANTS OF OPINION JUDGMENTS: FIELD EXPERIMENTAL PROBES OF JUDGMENTAL RELATIVITY BOUNDARY CONDITIONS.WHITE GM.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 32; NO 6; PP. 1047-1054; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

ATTITUDES AND NONATTITUDES IN THE BELIEF SYSTEMS OF MASS PUBLICSBISHOP GD; HAMILTON DL; MCCONAHAY JB et al.1980; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 110; NO 1; PP. 53-64; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

AN ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF COMMUNICATOR CHARACTERISTICS ON OPINION CHANGE: THE CASE OF COMMUNICATOR ATTRACTIVENESS.EAGLY AH; CHAIKEN S.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 136-144; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

CHANGING THE STATUS OF POORLY ESTEEMED STUDENTS THROUGH TEACHER REINFORCEMENT = LE CHANGEMENT DU STATUT D'ELEVES PEU ESTIMES PAR LE RENFORCEMENT VENANT DE L'ENSEIGNANTRETISH PM.1973; J. APPL. BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 9; NO 1; PP. 44-50; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

WHAT A PERSON THINKS UPON LEARNING HE HAS CHOSEN DIFFERENTLY FROM OTHERS: NICE EVIDENCE FOR THE PERSUASIVE ARGUMENTS EXPLANATION OF CHOICE SHIFTS.BURNSTEIN E; AMIRAM VINOKUR.1975; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 412-426; BIBL. 2 P. 1/2Article

MONOMORPHIC AND POLYMORPHIC OPINION LEADERSHIP WITHIN A RELATIVELY CLOSED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMRICHMOND VP.1980; HUM. COMMUN. RES.; ISSN 0360-3989; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 111-116; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL AND CONDITIONAL INFERENCE PROCESSES IN BELIEF FORMATION AND CHANGEWYER RS JR; HARTWICK J.1980; ADV. EXP. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0065-2601; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 13; PP. 241-284; BIBL. 3 P.Article

CHANGING ONE'S MIND FOLLOWING GROUP DISCUSSION: SEX DIFFERENCES AS A FUNCTION OF THE DIVERSITY OF OPINIONDURHAM TW.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 47; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 838; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF EXPECTED FUTURE INTERACTION AND PRIOR GROUP SUPPORT ON THE CONFORMITY PROCESSHANCOCK RD; SORRENTINO RM.1980; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 261-269; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

AUTOTELIC INQUIRY: A LEARNING APPROACH TO ATTITUDE CHANGEDYE CA.1980; EDUC. GERONTOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 3; PP. 239-248; BIBL. 2 P.Article

MACHIAVELLIANISM AND INGRATIATIONPANDEY J; RASTOGI R.1979; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 108; NO 2; PP. 221-225; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

RESPONSIVENESS AND COMMUNICATION MEDIUM IN DYADIC INTERACTIONS.WERNER C; LATANE B.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 13-15; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

WHEN INCREASING LIKING FOR A COMMUNICATOR DECREASES OPINION CHANGE: AN ATTRIBUTION ANALYSES OF ATTRACTIVENESSWACHTLER J; COUNSELMAN E.1981; J. EXP. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-1031; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 386-395; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE TRANSFORMATION OF OPINIONS, BELIEFS, AND HEURISTIC RULES INTO A SCHEDULING SIMULATION MODELRAMSING KD; DILTS DM.1979; ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT. ANNUAL MEETING. 39/1979/ATLANTA GA; USA; S.L.; ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT; DA. 1979; PP. 162-164;[ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PROCEEDINGS; ISSN 0065-0668; DA. 1979]Conference Paper

TEMPORAL DELAY, TYPE OF FOREWARNING, AND RESISTANCE TO INFLUENCE.HASS RG; GRADY K.1975; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 11; NO 5; PP. 459-469; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT FOR OPINIONS: A TEST OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIVERSITY HYPOTHESESMANSTEAD ASR.1982; BR. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 21; NO 1; PP. 35-41; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

"SLEEPER EFFECT" ET/OU EFFET MINORITAIRE. ETUDE THEORIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE DE L'INFLUENCE SOCIALE A RETARDEMENTMOSCOVICI S; MUGNY G; PAPASTAMOU S et al.1981; CAH. PSYCHOL. COGNITIVE; FRA; DA. 1981; VOL. 1; NO 2; PP. 199-221; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 3 P.Article

CONTAGION IN A CROWD: CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH A CROWD WILL REVERSE ITSELFCHAPKO MK; REVERS R.1978; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 105; NO 2; PP. 313-314; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

INSENSITIVITY TO SAMPLE BIAS: GENERALIZING FROM ATYPICAL CASESHAMILL R; DE CAMP WILSON T; NISBETT RE et al.1980; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 39; NO 4; PP. 578-589; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

DSYSTM: A BASIC COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE CAUSAL ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCY DATAPAVLHUS DL.1977; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1977; VOL. 37; NO 3; PP. 795-796; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

ARGUMENTATION, NEGOCIATION ET POLARISATIONPAICHELER G.1977; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FRA; DA. 1977-1978; VOL. 31; NO 337; PP. 923-931; BIBL. 13 REF.Article