SWITCHING SYSTEMS CONTROL BY MINICOMPUTER.1974; IN: IEEE INTERCON. INT. CONV. EXPO. INST. ELECTR. ELECTRON. ENG.; NEW YORK; 1974; NEW YORK; I.E.E.E.; DA. 1974; PP. (21P.)Conference Paper

WORKLOAD CHARACTERIZATION AND SELECTION IN COMPUTER PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTFERRARI D.1972; COMPUTER; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 18-24; BIBL. 22 REF.Serial Issue

ON THE WORKLOAD CHARACTERIZATION PROBLEM.AGRAWALA AK; MOHR JM.1975; IN: COMPCON 75. HOW TO MAKE COMPUT. EASIER TO USE. COMPUT. SOC. CONF. 11; WASHINGTON, D.C.; 1975; NEW YORK; INST. ELECTR. ELECTRON. ENG.; DA. 1975; PP. 300-302; BIBL. 14 REF.Conference Paper

AN ANALYTIC STUDY OF MEMORY ALLOCATION IN MULTIPROCESSING SYSTEMS.FERRARI D.1974; IN: COMPUT. ARCHIT. NETWORKS. MODELLING EVAL. PROC. INT. WORKSHOP; ROCQUENCOURT, FR.; 1974; AMSTERDAM; NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING CO.; DA. 1974; PP. 141-154; BIBL. 7 REF.Conference Paper

COMPUTER WORKLOAD FORECASTINGMCNEECE JE.1979; NATION. BUR. STAND., SPEC. PUBL.; USA; DA. 1979; 500-52; PP. 113-120Conference Paper

METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING A DISTRIBUTED DATA PROCESSING STRATEGYSTACK TR.1979; COMPUTER NETWORKING SYMPOSIUM/1979/GAITHERSBURG MD; USA; NEW YORK: IEEE; DA. 1979; PP. 52-59; BIBL. 6 REF.Conference Paper

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR GRACEFULLY DEGRADING SYSTEMSGAY FA; KETELSEN ML.1979; FTCS-9. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FAULT-TOLERANT COMPUTING. 9/1979/MADISON WI; USA; NEW YORK: IEEE; DA. 1979; PP. 51-58; BIBL. 19 REF.Conference Paper

A MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO TOTAL COMPUTER PRODUCTIVITY AT GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTERDAMON EP.1978; COMPSAC 78. INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE. 2/1978-11-13/CHICAGO; USA; NEW YORK: IEEE; DA. 1978; PP. 7-12Conference Paper

ABLAUFSTEUERUNG MIT HILFE DER BETRIEBSMITTELAUSLASTUNG. = MISE AU POINT GRACE A L'UTILISATION DES RESSOURCESHOFFMANN GR; GRAEF MA.1975; ANGEW. INFORMAT.; DTSCH.; DA. 1975; NO 3; PP. 107-112; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

AN INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM IN THE COMPLEX PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT.CLARK RB.1977; COMPUTERS INDUSTR. ENGNG; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 1; NO 2; PP. 95-110Article

A SIMULATION METHOD FOR SELECTING COMPUTER PROCESSORS FOR COMPUTER PROCESSOR EMULATION.BURRIS HR.1975; IN: MODELING SIMULATION. ANNU. CONF. 6; PITTSBURGH, PA.; 1975; PITTSBURGH; INSTRUM. SOC. AMERICA; DA. 1975; VOL. 1; PP. 415-421; BIBL. 6 REF.Conference Paper

BENCHMARKING AND WORKLOAD DEFINITION: A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH ABSTRACTS.WALKOWICZ JL.1974; NATION. BUR. STAND., SPEC. PUBL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; NO 405; PP. 1-43Article

SAMPLING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR BENCH MARKINGYEN EH.sdCMG9. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF COMPUTER PERFORMANCE/1978-12-05/SAN FRANCISCO CA; USA; BETHESDA: COMPUTER MEASUREMENT GROUP; DA. S.D.; PP. 169-175; BIBL. 2 REF.Conference Paper

A COMPARISON OF THE WORKLOAD ON SEVERAL COMPUTER SYSTEMSAGRAWALA AK; MOHR JM.sdCMG9. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF COMPUTER PERFORMANCE/1978-12-05/SAN FRANCISCO CA; USA; BETHESDA: COMPUTER MEASUREMENT GROUP; DA. S.D.; PP. 177-183; BIBL. 7 REF.Conference Paper

TUTORIAL ON BENCHMARK CONSTRUCTIONLETMANYI H.1979; NATION. BUR. STAND., SPEC. PUBL.; USA; DA. 1979; 500-52; PP. 235-240Conference Paper

USING ACCOUNTING LOG DATA IN PERFORMANCE REPORTINGBOUHANA JP.1979; NATION. BUR. STAND., SPEC. PUBL.; USA; DA. 1979; 500-52; PP. 241-243Conference Paper

AN OPTIMAL SAMPLE SIZE ALLOCATION SCHEME FOR BENCHMARK DESIGNTRIPATHI SK; GORDON KD; AGRAWALA AK et al.1979; NATION. BUR. STAND., SPEC. PUBL.; USA; DA. 1979; 500-52; PP. 105-111; BIBL. 12 REF.Conference Paper

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC FUNCTION-EXCHANGING MECHANISM IN FUNCTION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMMURAKAMI K; SATO M; HASEGAWA R et al.1978; SYST., COMPUT., CONTROLS; ISSN 0096-8765; USA; DA. 1978 PUBL. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 6; PP. 1-9; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ON THE INTERRELATIONS OF MEMORY SIZE, TIME SLICE, AND SYSTEM LOADING.SHUB CM.1977; IN: ANNU. SIMULATION SYMP. 10. PROC.; TAMPA, FLA.; 1977; LONG BEACH, CALIF.; I.E.E.E.; DA. 1977; PP. 95-108; BIBL. 4 REF.Conference Paper

SOFTWARE PHYSICS WORKLOAD CHARACTERIZATION.KOLENCE KW.1977; IN: SYST. AND SOFTWARE. ANNU. TECH. SYMP. 16. PROC.; GAITHERSBURG, MD.; 1977; WASHINGTON, D.C.; ASSOC. COMPUT. MACH.; DA. 1977; PP. 107-110; BIBL. 1 REF.Conference Paper

A CHARACTERIZATION OF VM/370 WORKLOADS.BARD Y.1977; IN: MODELLING PERFORMANCE EVAL. COMPUT. SYST. INT. WORKSHOP. PROC.; ISPRA; 1976; AMSTERDAM; NORTH-HOLLAND; DA. 1977; VOL. 35-55; BIBL. 10 REF.Conference Paper

AN APPROACH TO THE WORKLOAD CHARACTERIZATION PROBLEM.AGRAWALA AK; MOHR JM; BRYANT RM et al.1976; COMPUTER; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 9; NO 6; PP. 18-32; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

ON APPROXIMATE COMPUTER SYSTEM MODELS.GELENDE E.1975; J. ASS. COMPUTG MACHIN.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 261-269; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF THE OPERATOR IN THE SUPERMARKET AND RETAIL STORE SYSTEMS.ANTONELLI DC.1975; I.B.M. SYST. J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 35-45; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

A STRUCTURED APPROACH FOR EVALUATING UNIVAC 1100 SERIES COMPUTER SYSTEMSKELLY JC; ROUTE GP.sdCMG9. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF COMPUTER PERFORMANCE/1978-12-05/SAN FRANCISCO CA; USA; BETHESDA: COMPUTER MEASUREMENT GROUP; DA. S.D.; PP. 227-238; BIBL. 3 REF.Conference Paper