IMPROVEMENTS ON A NEW MODEL FOR CHOICE REACTION TIMELINK SW.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 5; PP. 443-446; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN RANDON WALK MODELS FOR TWO-CHOICE RESPONSE TIMES.SWENSSON RG; GREEN DM.1977; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 15; NO 3; PP. 282-291; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

CONTROL OF ASSOCIATED MOVEMENT AS A FACTOR INFLUENCING REACTION TIMES OF MENTALLY RETARDED ADULTSBREWER N; KIRBY NH; MEEUWISSEN R et al.1980; AM. J. MENT. DEFIC.; ISSN 0002-9351; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 85; NO 3; PP. 281-285; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

CORRELATION OF CHOICE REACTION TIME PERFORMANCE WITH BIORHYTHMIC CRITICALITY AND CYCLE PHASEWOLCOTT JH; HANSON CA; FOSTER WD et al.1979; AVIAT. SPACE ENVIRONMENT. MED.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 50; NO 1; PP. 34-39; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

AUTOCORRELATION OF CHOICE-REACTION TIMESLAMING D.1979; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 43; NO 5; PP. 381-412; BIBL. 2 P.Article

RELATION BETWEEN PROGRAMMING TIME AND DURATION OF THE RESPONSE BEING PROGRAMMED.KLAPP ST; ERWIN CI.1976; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 591-598; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE HICK-HYMAN'S AND STERNBERG'S LAWSKVALSETH TO.1980; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1281-1282; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

"THE LAST OF THE OLD LAG." A REPLY TO WELFORD'S COMMENT ON RABBIT AND RODGERSRABBITT P; RODGERS B.1979; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 543-548; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF TWO RANDOM-WALK MODELS FOR TWO-CHOICE REACTION TIMELAMING D.1979; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 43; NO 6; PP. 431-453; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMMENT ON THE PAPER "WHAT DOES A MAN DO AFTER HE MAKES AN ERROR. AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE PROGRAMMING" BY PATRICK RABBIT AND BRYAN RODGERSWELFORD AT.1979; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 539-542; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

PROCESSING LOCATIONAL AND ORIENTATIONAL INFORMATION.MAKI RH; MAKI WS JR; MARSH LG et al.1977; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 5; PP. 602-612; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

SPEED AND ACCURACY IN THE CHOICE REACTION TIME OF MILDLY RETARDED ADULTSBREWER N; NETTELBECK T.1979; AMER. J. MENTAL DEFIC.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 84; NO 1; PP. 55-61; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

STIMULUS CLASSIFICATION: PARTITIONING STRATEGIES AND USE OF EVIDENCERABBITT P.1979; PSYCHOL. LEARNG MOTIVAT.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 13; PP. 355-378; BIBL. 3 P.Article

OPERATOR'S ACTIVITIES AT CRT TERMINALS: A BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHDELVOLVE N; QUEINNEC Y.1983; ERGONOMICS; ISSN 0014-0139; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 26; NO 4; PP. 329-340; ABS. FRE/GER/JAP; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE RELIABILITY OF REACTION TIME DETERMINATIONS.HAMSHER K DE S; BENTON AL.1977; CORTEX; ITALY; DA. 1977; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 306-310; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSE PATTERNS DURING CHOICE REACTION TIMEJENNINGS JR; SCHROT J; WOOD CC et al.1980; PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 130-136; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

CHOICE REACTION PERFORMANCE FOLLOWING AN ERRORLAMING D.1979; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 43; NO 3; PP. 199-224; BIBL. 2 P.Article

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR MODELS OF LATENCY AND CHOICE.MILLER J; GREENO JG.1978; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 1-13; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

CORRECTING RESPONSE MEASURES FOR GUESSING AND PARTIAL INFORMATIONLINK SW.1982; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 92; NO 2; PP. 469-486; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF R-S INTERVAL DURATION ON SERIAL CHOICE REACTION TIME: PREPARATION TIME OR RESPONSE MONITORING TIME.RABBITT P.1980; ERGONOMICS; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 65-77; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

SEQUENTIAL EFFECTS OF CATCH-TRIALS ON CHOICE REACTION TIME.ALEGRIA J.1978; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1978; VOL. 42; NO 1; PP. 1-6; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

FURTHER TESTS OF A TWO-STATE MODEL FOR CHOISE REACTION TIMES.LUPKER SJ; THEIOS J.1977; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUMAN. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 496-504; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

STAGE 2 PROCESSING AND THE DIVIDED-ATTENTION EFFECT.GRIFFITH D; JOHNSTON WA.1977; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 5; NO 5; PP. 597-601; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

APPLICATION OF VARIABLE CRITERION THEORY TO CHOISE REACTION TIME.GRICE GR; NULLMEYER R; SPIKER VA et al.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 5; PP. 431-449; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

ALGORITHMS AND SELECTIVE ATTENTIONDIXON P.1981; MEM. COGNIT.; ISSN 0090-502X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 177-184; BIBL. 20 REF.Article