SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR TIME INTERVALSCHURCH RM.1980; LEARNG AND MOTIVAT.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 208-219; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF THE COMPATIBILITY AND METAXENIA EFFECTS OF SEVERAL DESSERT APPLE AND ORNAMENTAL MALUS CULTIVARS WITH COXS ORANGE PIPPINCHURCH RM; WILLIAMS RR.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 3; PP. 343-347; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

GROWTH AND FLOWERING OF ORNAMENTAL MALUS POLLINATORS IN APPLE ORCHARDSWILLIAMS RR; CHURCH RM.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 3; PP. 337-342; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF HALOPERIDOL AND METAMPHETAMINE ON TIME ESTIMATION IN THE RATMARICQ AV; CHURCH RM.1983; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA; ISSN 0033-3158; DEU; DA. 1983; VOL. 79; NO 1; PP. 10-15; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

DISCRIMINATION OF THE NUMBER OF SEQUENTIAL EVENTS BY RATSFERNANDES DM; CHURCH RM.1982; ANIM. LEARN. BEHAV.; ISSN 0090-4996; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 10; NO 2; PP. 171-176; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

ABSTRACTION OF TEMPORAL ATTRIBUTESMECK WH; CHURCH RM.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., ANIM. BEHAV. PROCESSES; ISSN 0097-7403; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 226-243; BIBL. 40 REF.Article

TIME LEFT: LINEAR VERSUS LOGARITHMIC SUBJECTIVE TIMEGIBBON J; CHURCH RM.1981; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 2; PP. 87-108; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

ADJUSTMENT OF SPEED IN REPEATED SHIFTS OF A NEGATIVE REINFORCER.GRACELY RH; CHURCH RM.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 5; PP. 455-457; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

TIMING OF AVOIDANCE RESPONSES BY RATSLIBRY ME; CHURCH RM.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 513-517; BIBL. 10REF.Article

DISCRIMINATION OF INTERTRIAL INTERVALS IN CROSS-MODAL TRANSFER OF DURATIONMECK WH; CHURCH RM.1982; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 19; NO 4; PP. 234-236; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

TEMPORAL GENERALIZATIONCHURCH RM; GIBBON J.1982; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., ANIM. BEHAV. PROCESSES; ISSN 0097-7403; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 165-186; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

THE TOXICITY TO APPLE POLLEN OF SEVERAL FUNGICIDES, AS DEMONSTRATED BY IN VIVO AND IN VITRO TECHNIQUES.CHURCH RM; WILLIAMS RR.1977; J. HORTIC. SCI.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 52; NO 3; PP. 429-436; BIBL. 2 P.Article

BISECTION OF TEMPORAL INTERVALS.CHURCH RM; DELUTY MZ.1977; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 216-228; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

DOES THE HEADLESS ROACH LEARN TO AVOID.CHURCH RM; LERNER ND.1976; PSYCHOL. PHYSIOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 4; PP. 439-442; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

MAGNITUDE OF FEAR AS A FUNCTION OF EXPECTED TIME TO AN AVERSIVE EVENTLABARBERA JD; CHURCH RM.1974; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 199-202; BIBL. 8REF.Article

COMPARISON OF FLOWER NUMBERS AND POLLEN PRODUCTION OF SEVERAL DESSERT APPLE AND ORNAMENTAL MALUS CULTIVARSCHURCH RM; WILLIAMS RR.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 3; PP. 327-336; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF PRE-BLOSSOM FUNGICIDES SPRAYS ON THE ABILITY OF COX'S ORANGE PIPPIN APPLE FLOWERS TO PRODUCE FRUITCHURCH RM; WILLIAMS RR.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 2; PP. 169-172; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

AN EXPLANATION OF THE LANGUAGE OF A CHIMPANZEETHOMPSON CR; CHURCH RM.1980; SCIENCE; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 208; NO 4441; PP. 313-314; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

CONTROL OF AN INTERNAL CLOCK.ROBERTS S; CHURCH RM.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 4; PP. 318-337; BIBL. 2 P.Article

INDUCED MUTANTS OF COX'S ORANGE PIPPIN APPLE WITH APPARENT INCREASED SELF-COMPATIBILITY. II: LABORATORY AND ORCHARD ASSESSMENT AND TESTINGLACEY CND; CHURCH RM; RICHARDSON P et al.1982; EUPHYTICA; ISSN 0014-2336; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 511-518; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

COMPARISON OF FLOWERING DATES AND POLLEN RELEASE CHARACTERISTICS OF SEVERAL MALUS CULTIVARS USED AS POLLINATORS FOR COXS ORANGE PIPPIN APPLECHURCH RM; WILLIAMS RR; ANDREWS L et al.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 3; PP. 349-353; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

TESTING THE TOXICITY OF FUNGICIDES TO APPLE POLLENCHURCH RM; COOKE BK; WILLIAMS RR et al.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 2; PP. 161-163; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

METHAMPHETAMINE AND TIME ESTIMATIONMARICQ AV; ROBERTS S; CHURCH RM et al.1981; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 18-30; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE EFFECTS OF SPRAY VOLUME ON THE TOXICITY OF CAPTAN AND DINOCAP TO APPLE POLLEN IN THE ORCHARDCHURCH RM; COOKE BK; MORGAN NG et al.1983; JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0022-1589; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 58; NO 2; PP. 165-168; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

USE OF AN ANTHOCYANIN PROGENY MARKER TO DETERMINE THE VALUE OF HIVE POLLEN DISPENSERS IN APPLE ORCHARDSWILLIAMS RR; CHURCH RM; WOOD DES et al.1979; J. HORTIC. SCI.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 54; NO 1; PP. 75-78; BIBL. 10 REF.Article