Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("COMPLEXITE STIMULUS")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 587

  • Page / 24
Export

Selection :

  • and

ANAGRAM PERFORMANCE FOLLOWING INITIAL EXPOSURE TO INSOLUBLE ANAGRAMS = LA PERFORMANCE AUX ANAGRAMMES APRES UNE PRESENTATION INITIALE AUX ANAGRAMMES INSOLUBLESSCHMECK RR; DUNCKLEY C.1973; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 36; NO 1; PP. 122; BIBL. 1REF.Article

INTRADIMENSIONAL VARIABILITY IN CONCEPT IDENTIFICATION: A REPLICATION, EXTENSION, AND PARTIAL CLARIFICATION OF THE HAYGOOD, HARBERT, AND OMLOR FINDINGS = VARIABILITE INTRADIMENSIONNELLE DANS L'IDENTIFICATION DE CONCEPTS: REPLICATION, EXTENSION ET CLARIFICATION PARTIELLE DES RESULTATS DE HAYGOOD, HARBERT ET OMLORSCHULTZ RF JR; DODD DH.1972; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 94; NO 3; PP. 321-325; BIBL. 5REF.Article

LEARNING BY MATURE-YOUNG AND AGED WISTAR ALBINO RATS AS A FUNCTION OF TEST COMPLEXITY = L'APPRENTISSAGE PAR DES RATS BLANCS WISTAR ADULTES JEUNES ET AGES EN FONCTION DE LA COMPLEXITE DU TESTGOODRICK CL.1972; J. GERONTOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 27; NO 3; PP. 353-357; BIBL. 14REF.Article

RATED PREFERENCE AND COMPLEXITY FOR NATURAL AND URBAN VISUAL MATERIAL = COMPLEXITE ET PREFERENCE ESTIMEES DANS LE CAS DE MATERIEL VISUEL REPRESENTANT LA NATURE OU LA VILLEKAPLAN S; KAPLAN R; WENDT JS et al.1972; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 354-356; BIBL. 9REF.Article

STIMULUS COMPOUNDING IN FREE-OPERANT AND CLASSICAL CONDITIONING. A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS = UNE REVUE ANALYTIQUE DE LA COMBINAISON DES STIMULI DANS LE CONDITIONNEMENT INSTRUMENTAL LIBRE ET LE CONDITIONNEMENT CLASSIQUEWEISS SJ.1972; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 78; NO 3; PP. 189-208; BIBL. 2P.Article

COMPLEXITY AS A DETERMINANT OF VISUAL FIELD EFFECTS FOR RANDOM FORMS.HANNAY HJ; ROGERS JP; DURANT RF et al.1976; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1976; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 29-34; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

A TEST OF VITZ AND TODD'S MODEL OF THE JUDGED COMPLEXITY OF STRAIGHT-LINE FIGURES. = UN TEST DU MODELE DE VITZ ET TODD DE L'EVALUATION DE LA COMPLEXITE DE FIGURES DE LIGNES DROITESKUBOVY M; TZELGOV J.1975; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 186-190; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

LOCUS OF THEMATIC EFFECTS IN RETENTION OF PROSE = LIEU DES EFFETS THEMATIQUES DANS LA RETENTION DE LA PROSEDOOLING DJ; MULLET RL.1973; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 97; NO 3; PP. 404-406; BIBL. 6REF.Article

ENDS AND MEANS OF EXPERIMENTAL AESTHETICS = FINALITES ET SIGNIFICATIONS DE L'ESTHETIQUE EXPERIMENTALEBERLYNE DE.1972; CANAD. J. PSYCHOL.; CANADA; DA. 1972; VOL. 26; NO 4; PP. 303-325; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 2P.1/2Article

REINFORCEMENT VALUES OF VISUAL PATTERNS COMPARED THROUGH CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES = COMPARAISON DES VALEURS DE RENFORCEMENT DE PATTERNS VISUELS PRESENTES SIMULTANEMENTBERLYNE DE.1972; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 281-285; BIBL. 11REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF AMBIGUITY, FAMILIARIZATION, AGE AND SEX ON STIMULUS PREFERENCE = EFFETS DE L'AMBIGUITE DE LA FAMILIARISATION DE L'AGE ET DU SEXE SUR LA PREFERENCE VISUELLE MANIFESTEE ENVERS UN STIMULUSBARTOL CR; PIELSTICK NL.1972; J. EXPER. CHILD PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 14; NO 1; PP. 21-29; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

THE OVERTRAINING REVERSAL EFFECT IN RATS: A FUNCTION OF TASK DIFFICULTY = L'EFFET D'INVERSION DU AU SURENTRAINEMENT CHEZ LES RATS: UNE FONCTION DE LA DIFFICULTE DE LA TACHERICHMAN CL; KNOBLOCK K; COUSSENS W et al.1972; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 291-298; BIBL. 16REF.Article

EFFECTS OF BIAS ON PROCESSING AND AND REPROCESSING OF LEXICALLY AMBIGUOUS SENTENCES = EFFETS DU BIAIS SUR LE TRAITEMENT INITIAL ET LE 2EME TRAITEMENT DE PHRASES AMBIGUES DU POINT DE VUE LEXIQUECAIRNS HS.1973; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 97; NO 3; PP. 337-343; BIBL. 9REF.Article

ESTIMATION DU TEMPS DE PRESENTATION COMME INDICE DE LA COMPLEXITE SYNTAXIQUE DES PHRASESNOIZET G; DO P.1972; BULL. PSYCHOL.; FR.; DA. 1972; VOL. 26; NO 304; PP. 396-404; BIBL. 16REF.Article

REDONDANCE ET COMPLEXITE. ETUDE DU PROCESSUS DE CODAGE DANS LA TRANSMISSION DES INFORMATIONS VISUELLESSIMON JG.1972; PSYCHOL. BELG.; BELG.; DA. 1972; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 255-263; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 9REF.Article

COMPONENT STIMULI, PAIRING, SPATIAL SEPARATION, AND IDENTIFICATION OF A STIMULUS COMPLEX.KING DL; KHAN M.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 103-105; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INFLUENCE OF TEST LENGTH AND DIFFICULTY LEVEL ON PERFORMANCE AFTER ALCOHOL = INFLUENCE DE LA LONGUEUR DE L'EPREUVE ET DU NIVEAU DE DIFFICULTE SUR LA PERFORMANCE APRES ALCOOLLEWIS EG.1973; QUART. J. STUD. ALCOHOL, A; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 78-88; BIBL. 5REF.Article

EFFECTS OF NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVE STATES AND NUMBER OF CHANNELS ON THE MONITORING OF MULTICHANNEL DISPLAYS = EFFETS DU NOMBRE D'ETATS ALTERNES ET DU NOMBRE DE CANAUX SUR LE CONTROLE DE PRESENTATION A PLUSIEURS CANAUXHICKS JA III.1972; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 94; NO 3; PP. 348-350; BIBL. 4REF.Article

PERIPHERAL DETECTION AND CENTRAL TASK COMPLEXITY.BARTZ AE.1976; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 18; NO 1; PP. 63-69; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

THE ROLE OF SURFACE ORDER AND SURFACE DELETION IN SENTENCE PERCEPTION.HOLMES VM; WATSON IJ.1976; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 28; NO 2; PP. 155-165; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

CONTRAST EFFECTS IN THE RESPONSE TO ARTLINDAUER MS; DINTRUFF DD.1975; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 155-164; BIBL. 20REFArticle

COMPLEXITY AND THE REPRESENTATION OF PATTERNED SEQUENCES OF SYMBOLS = COMPLEXITE ET REPRESENTATION D'UNE SERIE DE STRUCTURES DE SYMBOLESSIMON HA.1972; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 79; NO 5; PP. 369-382; BIBL. 21REF.Article

IS RECOGNITION ACCURACY REALLY IMPAIRED WHEN THE TARGET IS REPEATED IN THE DISPLAY.ERIKSEN CW; MORRIS N; YEI YU YEH et al.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 375-385; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

COMPOSITE STIMULI ARE DETECTED BY GRATING DETECTORS RATHER THAN BY LINE DETECTORS.GLEZER VD; KOSTELYANETS NB; COOPERMAN AM et al.1977; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 17; NO 9; PP. 1067-1070; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

SIGNAL COMPLEXITY, RESPONSE COMPLEXITY, AND SIGNAL SPECIFICATION IN VIGILANCE.CHILDS JM.1976; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 149-160; BIBL. 36 REF.Article

  • Page / 24