CONSTRUCTION OF A D2.B6-FV-2^R CONGENIC MOUSE STRAIN: NONLETHALITY OF THE HOMOZYGOUS FV-2^R GENOTYPEDIZIK M; ELLIOTT RW; LILLY F et al.1981; J. NATL. CANCER INST.; ISSN 0027-8874; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 755-760; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

New leptin receptor mutations in mice: Lepr^db-rtnd, Lepr^db-dmpg and lepr^db-rlpyJUNG HAN KIM; TAYLOR, Paul N; YOUNG, Dawn et al.The Journal of nutrition. 2003, Vol 133, Num 5, pp 1265-1271, issn 0022-3166, 7 p.Article

THE MINIMAL LENGTH OF THE DIFFERENTIAL SEGMENT IN H-2 CONGENIC LINESKLEIN D; TEWARSON S; FIGUEROA F et al.1982; IMMUNOGENETICS (NEW YORK); ISSN 0093-7711; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 319-328; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

FV-2 LOCUS CONTROLS THE PROPORTION OF ERYTHROPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS (BFU-E) SYNTHESIZING DNA IN NORMAL MICESUZUKI S; AXELRAD AA.1980; CELL; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 225-236; BIBL. 42 REF.Article

Convergence of congenic mapping and allele-specific alterations in tumors for the resolution of the Skts1 skin tumor susceptibility locusDE KONING, J. P; WAKABAYASHI, Y; NAGASE, H et al.Oncogene (Basingstoke). 2007, Vol 26, Num 28, pp 4171-4178, issn 0950-9232, 8 p.Article

LES BASES GENETIQUES DE LA COMPATIBILITE TISSULAIRE. I: APPROCHE METHODOLOGIQUEGUENET JL.1980; SCI. TECH. ANIMAL LAB.; FRA; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 43-48; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

EVIDENCE FOR THYROGLOBULIN-REACTIVE T CELLS IN GOOD RESPONDER MICE.ESQUIVEL PS; KONG YM; ROSE NR et al.1978; CELL. IMMUNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 14-19; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

MAPPING OF AN H-2-LINKED GENE THAT INFLUENCES MATING PREFERENCE IN MICE.ANDREWS PW; BOYSE EA.1978; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 265-268; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE SCREENING OF NON-H-2 CONGENIC LINES FOR SK LOCISTEINMULLER D; MARCUS JL; BAILEY DW et al.1978; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 239-245; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A genome-wide set of congenic mouse strains derived from CAST/Ei on a C57BL/6 backgroundDAVIS, Richard C; JIN, Angela; ROSALES, Melenie et al.Genomics (San Diego, Calif.). 2007, Vol 90, Num 3, pp 306-313, issn 0888-7543, 8 p.Article

Chicken developmental antigens in 15l₅-B-congenic linesQURESHI, M. A; TREMBICKI, K. A; DIETERT, R. R et al.The journal of heredity. 1986, Vol 77, Num 6, pp 435-440, issn 0022-1503Article

Stable genotypic composition of blood cells in allophenic mice derived from congenic C57BL/6 strainsBEHRINGER, R. R; ELDRIDGE, P. W; DEWEY, M. J et al.Developmental biology (Print). 1984, Vol 101, Num 1, pp 251-256, issn 0012-1606Article

Residual minor histocompatibility genes contaminate the B10.Am congenic line: no evidence of C-region-controlled histoincompatibilityJURETIC, A; PROTRKA, N; WALDEN, P et al.Scandinavian journal of immunology (Print). 1983, Vol 18, Num 6, pp 515-519, issn 0300-9475Article

AT HOW MANY HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCI DO CONGENIC MOUSE STRAINS DIFFER. PROBABILITY ESTIMATES AND SOME IMPLICATIONSJOHNSON LL.1981; J. HERED.; ISSN 0022-1503; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 72; NO 1; PP. 27-31; BIBL. 40 REF.Article

MURINE LYMPHOCYTE ALLOANTIGENS. I: THE LY-6 LOCUSPOTTER TA; MCKENSIE IFC; MORGAN GM et al.1980; J. IMMUNOL.; ISSN 0022-1767; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 125; NO 2; PP. 541-550; BIBL. 27 REF.Article

INHERITANCE OF TOLERANCE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO HUMAN GAMMA -GLOBULIN IN CONGENIC MICERANGES GE; AZAR MM.1979; J. IMMUNOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 123; NO 3; PP. 1151-1154; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THIRTEEN NEW CHROMOSOME-7 CONGENIC LINESGRAFF RJ; BROWN DH; SNELL GD et al.1979; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 245-256; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

COMPETITION BETWEEN CONGENIC ESCHERICHIA COLI K-12 STRAINS IN VIVOONDERDONK A; MARSHALL B; CISNEROS R et al.1981; INFECT. IMMUN.; ISSN 0019-9567; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 74-79; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

ASYMMETRY IN THE SEROLOGICAL RESPONSE AND MIXED LYMPHOCYTE REACTIONS BETWEEN C57BL/6 AND THE CONGENIC MUTANT C57BL/6.CH.2^BA(H(Z1)).CHAUVENET PH; AMOS DB; SMITH RT et al.1978; J. IMMUNOGENET.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 179-191; BIBL. 2 P.Article

HOST DEFENSES IN EXPERIMENTAL SCRUB TYPHUS: DELAYED-TYPE HYPERSENSITIVITY RESPONSES OF INBRED MICEJERRELLS TR; OSTERMAN JV.1982; INFECT. IMMUN.; ISSN 0019-9567; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 117-123; BIBL. 30 REF.Article

SUCCESSFUL COOPERATIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PRIMED T AND B LYMPHOCYTES DERIVED FROM G_IX⁺ AND G_IX^- CONGENIC MICEYAMAMOTO H; KATZ DH.1978; CELL. IMMUNOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 41; NO 2; PP. 414-420; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

Dissection of Chromosome 18 Blood Pressure and Salt-Sensitivity Quantitative Trait Loci in the Spontaneously Hypertensive RatJOHNSON, Michelle D; LIQUN HE; KREN, Vladimir et al.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979). 2009, Vol 54, Num 3, pp 639-645, issn 0194-911X, 7 p.Article

α-Kinase 2 is a novel candidate gene for inherited hypertension in Dahl ratsCHAUVET, Cristina; CRESPO, Kimberley; MENARD, Annie et al.Journal of hypertension. 2011, Vol 29, Num 7, pp 1320-1326, issn 0263-6352, 7 p.Article

Cross-Talk of Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Within 2 Interacting Blood Pressure Quantitative Trait LociLEE, Norman H; HAAS, Brian J; JOE, Bina et al.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979). 2007, Vol 50, Num 6, pp 1126-1133, issn 0194-911X, 8 p.Article

EXPERIMENTAL ERYTHROCYTE AUTOIMMUNITY. I: MICE CONGENIC FOR IMMUNOGLOBULIN ALLOTYPES VARY IN PRODUCTION OF AUTOANTIBODIES BUT PRODUCE SUPPRESSOR CELLS NOT RESTRICTED BY ALLOTYPESCOX KO; COX J; THOMAS WR et al.1980; IMMUNOLOGY; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 40; NO 2; PP. 171-176; BIBL. 16 REF.Article