CONSTRUCTION OF A D2.B6-FV-2^R CONGENIC MOUSE STRAIN: NONLETHALITY OF THE HOMOZYGOUS FV-2^R GENOTYPEDIZIK M; ELLIOTT RW; LILLY F et al.1981; J. NATL. CANCER INST.; ISSN 0027-8874; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 755-760; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

ANALYSIS OF MAJOR GENE EFFECTS USING RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAINS AND RELATED CONGENIC LINES.KLEIN TW.1978; BEHAV. GENET.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 261-268; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

LES BASES GENETIQUES DE LA COMPATIBILITE TISSULAIRE. I: APPROCHE METHODOLOGIQUEGUENET JL.1980; SCI. TECH. ANIMAL LAB.; FRA; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 43-48; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE MINIMAL LENGTH OF THE DIFFERENTIAL SEGMENT IN H-2 CONGENIC LINESKLEIN D; TEWARSON S; FIGUEROA F et al.1982; IMMUNOGENETICS (NEW YORK); ISSN 0093-7711; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 319-328; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

FV-2 LOCUS CONTROLS THE PROPORTION OF ERYTHROPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS (BFU-E) SYNTHESIZING DNA IN NORMAL MICESUZUKI S; AXELRAD AA.1980; CELL; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 19; NO 1; PP. 225-236; BIBL. 42 REF.Article

MAPPING OF AN H-2-LINKED GENE THAT INFLUENCES MATING PREFERENCE IN MICE.ANDREWS PW; BOYSE EA.1978; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 265-268; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE SCREENING OF NON-H-2 CONGENIC LINES FOR SK LOCISTEINMULLER D; MARCUS JL; BAILEY DW et al.1978; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 239-245; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EVIDENCE FOR THYROGLOBULIN-REACTIVE T CELLS IN GOOD RESPONDER MICE.ESQUIVEL PS; KONG YM; ROSE NR et al.1978; CELL. IMMUNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 37; NO 1; PP. 14-19; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

THE INCEPTION OF THE RESPONSE TO SRBC BY NUDE MICE INJECTED WITH VARIOUS DOSES OF CONGENIC OR ALLOGENEIC THYMUS CELLS = LE DEBUT DE LA REPONSE AUX HEMATIES DE MOUTON DES SOURIS NUDE INJECTEES AVEC DES DOSES VARIEES DE CELLULES THYMIQUES CONGENIQUES OU ALLOGENIQUESKINDRED B.1975; CELL. IMMUNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 277-284; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

GENETICS OF THE ALPHA 1,6 DEXTRAN RESPONSE: EXPRESSION OF THE QUPC 52 IDIOTYPE IN DIFFERENT INBRED AND CONGENIC STRAINS OF MICED'HOOSTELAERE L; POTTER M.1982; J. IMMUNOL.; ISSN 0022-1767; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 128; NO 1; PP. 492-497; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

DIVERGENT EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA ON GROWTH OF RAT TUMOURS IN SYNGENEIC RECIPIENTS AND ATHYMIC NUDE MICEPIMM MV; BALDWIN RW.1979; EUROP. J. CANCER; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 15; NO 7; PP. 1005-1008; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

MATING PREFERENCE TESTS VOITH THE RECOMBINANT CONGENIC STRAIN BALB. HTG.YAMAGUCHI M; YAMAZAKI K; BOYSE EA et al.1978; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 261-264; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

CONSTRUCTION OF A DBA/2.FV-2^R CONGENIC STRAIN. APPARENT LETHALITY OF THE HOMOZYGOUS FV-2^R GENOTYPE: BRIEF COMMUNICATION.BLANK KJ; LILLY F.1977; J. NATION. CANCER INST.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 59; NO 4; PP. 1335-1336; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE INCREASING VALUE OF CONGENIC MICE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH.BOYSE EA.1977; LAB. ANIMAL SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 27; NO 5 PART. 2; PP. 771-781; BIBL. 16 REF.; (CHARLES RIVER INT. SYMP. LAB. ANIM. 3. PROC.; STRASBOURG; 1977)Conference Paper

PLEIOTROPIC AND OTHER GENETIC EFFECTS INFLUENCING THE ACTIVITIES OF BRAINS AND LIVER ENZYMES IN CONGENIC LINES OF C57BL/6J MICE WITH DEFINED ELECTROPHORETIC VARIANT MARKERSFEUERS RJ; BISHOP JB; MCGARRITY LJ et al.1982; BIOCHEMICAL GENETICS; ISSN 0006-2928; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 20; NO 11-12; PP. 1139-1149; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

AN ANALYSIS OF GENETIC FACTORS REGULATING LIKE-SPAN IN CONGENIC MICEPOPP DM.1982; MECH. AGEING DEV.; ISSN 0047-6374; CHE; DA. 1982; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 125-134; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

GENETIC DEFINITION OF I REGION-DETERMINED ANTIGENS OF THE RAT MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX.GUNTHER E; STARK O; KOCH C et al.1978; EUROP. J. IMMUNOL.; GERM.; DA. 1978; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 206-212; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

MATING PREFERENCES OF F₂ SEGREGANTS OF CROSSES BETWEEN MHC-CONGENIC MOUSE STRAINS.YAMAZAKI K; YAMAGUCHI M; ANDREWS PW et al.1978; IMMUNOGENETICS; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 253-259; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GENETIC EFFECTS IN ISOGENIC DIPLOID AND TETRAPLOID OF FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDS. II. LEAF ELONGATION AND SEEDLING GROWTH STUDIESEASTON HS.1978; ANN. AMELIOR. PLANTES; FRA; DA. 1978 PUBL. 1979; VOL. 28; NO 6; PP. 609-622; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GENETIC EFFECTS IN ISOGENIC DIPLOID AND TETRAPLOID PLANTS OF FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDS. III. THEORETICAL MODELEASTON HS.1978; ANN. AMELIOR. PLANTES; FRA; DA. 1978 PUBL. 1979; VOL. 28; NO 6; PP. 623-636; ABS. FRE; BIBL. 1 P.Article

DEVELOPMENT OF A CONGENEIC LINE OF THE GR MOUSE STRAIN WITHOUT EARLY MAMMARY TUMOURS.VANNIE R; DE MOES J.1977; INTERNATION. J. CANCER; SWITZ.; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 588-594; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

Chicken developmental antigens in 15l₅-B-congenic linesQURESHI, M. A; TREMBICKI, K. A; DIETERT, R. R et al.The journal of heredity. 1986, Vol 77, Num 6, pp 435-440, issn 0022-1503Article

Stable genotypic composition of blood cells in allophenic mice derived from congenic C57BL/6 strainsBEHRINGER, R. R; ELDRIDGE, P. W; DEWEY, M. J et al.Developmental biology (Print). 1984, Vol 101, Num 1, pp 251-256, issn 0012-1606Article

Residual minor histocompatibility genes contaminate the B10.Am congenic line: no evidence of C-region-controlled histoincompatibilityJURETIC, A; PROTRKA, N; WALDEN, P et al.Scandinavian journal of immunology (Print). 1983, Vol 18, Num 6, pp 515-519, issn 0300-9475Article

COMPETITION BETWEEN CONGENIC ESCHERICHIA COLI K-12 STRAINS IN VIVOONDERDONK A; MARSHALL B; CISNEROS R et al.1981; INFECT. IMMUN.; ISSN 0019-9567; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 74-79; BIBL. 12 REF.Article