MANIPULATION OF RESPONSE-CONTINGENT UNCONDITIONED-STIMULUS INTENSITY IN HUMAN EYELID CONDITIONING: A TWO-PHASE MODEL ANALYSIS.CLARK CG; PROKASY WF.1976; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 277-282; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

RESPONSE-CONTINGENT PRENATAL EXPERIENCE OF MATERNAL CALLS IN THE PECKING DUCK (ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS)IMPEKOVEN M.1973; ANIMAL BEHAV.; G.B.; DA. 1973; VOL. 21; NO 1; PP. 164-168; BIBL. 20 REF.Serial Issue

CONTINGENT DECISION BEHAVIORPAYNE JW.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 92; NO 2; PP. 382-402; BIBL. 3 P.Article

STIMULUS CONTROL AFTER EXTRADIMENSIONAL TRAINING IN PIGEONS: A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE CONTINGENT AND NON-CONTINGENT TRAINING PROCEDURESHALL G; HONIG WK.1974; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 87; NO 5; PP. 945-952; BIBL. 13REF.Article

THE CONTROL OF UNDESIRED BEHAVIOR BY SELF-IMPOSED CONTINGENCIES = LE CONTROLE D'UN COMPORTEMENT INDESIRABLE PAR DES CONTINGENCES AUTO-IMPOSEESEPSTEIN LH; PETERSON GL.1973; BEHAV. THERAPY; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 91-95; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

AN ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCIES IN THE APPALACHIAN COALFIELDS. = UNE ANALYSE DES CONTINGENCES DANS LES MINES DE CHARBON DES APPALACHESNOONAN JR.1976; COMMUN. MENTAL HEALTH J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 99-105; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE VALUE-AVERAGING MODEL: AN ALTERNATIVE TO "CONSERVATION IN BEHAVIOR"MAZUR JE.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 108; NO 1; PP. 43-47; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

APPLICATION OF A DRIVE AND AN ASSOCIATIVE THEORY TO THE EFFECTS OF CR-CONTINGENT INCREMENTS AND DECREMENTS IN UNCONDITIONED STIMULUS INTENSITY.PROKASY WF.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 373-376; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

REGULATION AND TIME ALLOCATION: COMMENT ON "CONSERVATION IN BEHAVIOR"STADDON JER.1979; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., GEN.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 108; NO 1; PP. 35-40; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

A TWO-PROCESS THEORY OF LEARNED HELPLESSNESS.KOLLER PS; KAPLAN RM.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 96; NO 10; PP. 1177-1183; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

PRODUCING OR OBSERVING RESPONSE-OUTCOME CONTINGENCIES IN A TWO RESPONSE ALTERNATIVE TASK.EELEN P; D'YDEWALLE G.1976; PSYCHOL. BELG.; BELG.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 1; PP. 61-71; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

TEMPORAL CONTROL ON PERIODIC SCHEDULES: SIGNAL PROPERTIES OF REINFORCEMENT AND BLACKOUTSTARR BC; STADDON JER.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 535-545; BIBL. 26REF.Article

PAIRED BASELINE PERFORMANCE AS A BEHAVIORAL IDEALALLISON J.1981; J. EXP. ANAL. BEHAV.; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 35; NO 3; PP. 355-366; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

HOMOGENIZING THE 2 X 2 CONTINGENCY TABLE: A METHOD FOR REMOVING DEPENDENCIES DUE TO SUBJECT AND ITEM DIFFERENCESFLEXSER AJ.1981; PSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0033-295X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 88; NO 4; PP. 327-339; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

SUPPRESSION OF CHRONIC HYPERVENTILATION USING RESPONSE-CONTINGENT AROMATIC AMMONIASINGH NN; DAWSON MJ; GREGORY PR et al.1980; BEHAV. THER.; ISSN 0005-7894; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 4; PP. 561-566; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

INFLUENCE OF CONTINGENT RESPONDING ON SCHEDULE-INDUCED ACTIVITY IN HUMAN SUBJECTSLASITER PS.1979; PHYSIOL. AND BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 239-243; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

KONTINGENZERWARTUNGEN BEI REAKTIONSINKONTINGENTER TREFFERRUECKMELDUNG = EXPECTATION DE CONTINGENCE DANS LE CAS D'UNE RETROACTION DE REUSSITE INDEPENDANTE DE LA REPONSERUEBELING H.1981; ARCH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0066-6475; DEU; DA. 1981-1982; VOL. 134; NO 1; PP. 33-46; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 1 P.Article

SIMPSON'S PARADOX RESOLVED: A REPLY TO HINTZMANMARTIN E.1981; PSYCHOL. REV.; ISSN 0033-295X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 88; NO 4; PP. 372-374; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

INSTRUMENTAL AVOIDANCE ACQUISITION BY GOLDFISH IN A Y-MAZE USING EXPLICIT AND RESPONSE-CONTINGENT CUESZERBOLIO DJ JR; WICKSTRA LL.1980; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 304-310; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

RESPONSE-CONTINGENT SENSORY CHANGE IN A CAUSALLY STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENT.GLOW PH; WINEFIELD AH.1978; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 1-18; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

AN OPERANT PROCEDURE FOR TESTING OLFACTORY CAPACITIES IN RESTRAINED PIGEONSWALKER JC.1983; PHYSIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0031-9384; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 165-168; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

BEHAVIOR INDUCED BY PERIODIC FOOD DELIVERY: THE EFFECTS OF INTERFOOD INTERVALINNIS NK; SIMMELHAG GRANT VL; STADDON JER et al.1983; JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0022-5002; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 309-322; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF A BRIEF STIMULUS ACCOMPANYING REINFORCEMENT ON INSTRUMENTAL RESPONDING IN PIGEONSHALL G.1982; LEARN. MOTIV.; ISSN 0023-9690; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 26-43; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

EFFECT OF TRAINER'S PRESENCE AND RESPONSE-CONTINGENT FEEDBACK IN BIOFEEDBACK-RELAXATION TRAININGHAMBERGER LK; LOHR JM.1981; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 53; NO 1; PP. 15-24; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

BLOCKING AND ENHANCEMENT OF FEAR CONDITIONING BY APPETITIVE CSSGOODMAN JH; FOWLER H.1983; ANIMAL LEARNING AND BEHAVIOR; ISSN 0090-4996; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 75-82; BIBL. 26 REF.Article