EIN SUBJEKTIVES KONTRASTERLEBNIS IM ALLTAG EINES AUGENARZTES = UN EFFET DE CONTRASTE SUBJECTIF RENCONTRE JOURNELLEMENT PAR UN OPHTALMOLOGISTEWIRTH A.1979; KLIN. MONATSBL. AUGENHEILKDE; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 175; NO 6; PP. 846-848; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

CONTRAST PARADOX OF LINE TARGET UPON GRATING BACKGROUNDVAN MEETEREN A.1982; VIS. RES. (OXF.); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 337-338; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

TILT AFTEREFFECT WITH SMALL ADAPTING ANGLESSKOTTUN BC; JOHNSEN T; MAGNUSSEN S et al.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 199-200; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF SPATIAL FREQUENCY AND CONTRAST ON VISUAL PERSISTENCEBOWLING A; LOVEGROVE W; MAPPERSON B et al.1979; PERCEPTION; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 5; PP. 529-539; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CONTRAST EFFECT IN THE INTERVIEW.SCHUCH AJ.1978; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 11; NO 3; PP. 195-196; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

MEASURING DRIVERS' GLASE SENSITIVITY: EVALUATION OF AN AUTOMATED TECHNIQUESTURGIS SP; PULLING NH; VAILLANCOURT DR et al.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 1; PP. 97-101; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

METACONTRAST: INTERNAL CONTOURS AND DIFFERENT DEPENDENT VARIABLES.LEFTON LA; HERNANDEZ LL.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 6; PP. 427-430; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

TRANSIENT SENSITIZATION BY A CONTRAST FLASHPULOS E; RAYMOND JE; MAKOUS W et al.1980; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 281-288; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

POSITIVE CONTRAST AS DUE TO HAPPINESSWEINSTEIN L.1982; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 97-98; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

CONTRAST AND THE DIFFERENCE OF LOGARITHMSCORWIN TR.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 3; PP. 289-290; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

CONTRAST, SIGNALED REINFORCEMENT, AND THE RELATIVE LAW OF EFFECTWILLIAMS BA.1980; AM. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0002-9556; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 93; NO 4; PP. 617-629; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECTS OF WEDGE DEGRADATION ON THE MAGNITUDE OF THE PONZO ILLUSIONLIBET AQ; POLLACK RH; MALATESTA VJ et al.1980; BULL. PSYCHOM. SOC.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 15; NO 6; PP. 371-374; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF CONTRAST UPON COMPLIANCE WITH SOCIALLY UNDESIRABLE REQUESTS IN THE DOOR-IN-THE-FACE PARADIGMSHANAB ME; O'NEILL P.1979; CANAD. J. BEHAV. SCI.; CAN; DA. 1979; VOL. 11; NO 3; PP. 236-244; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SIMULTANEOUS CONTRAST AND COLOURED AFTERIMAGESANSTIS S; ROGERS B; HENRY J et al.1978; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 18; NO 8; PP. 899-911; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

A FURTHER PARALLEL BETWEEN SELECTIVE ADAPTATION AND CONTRASTDIEHL RL; LANG M; PARKER EM et al.1980; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 24-44; BIBL. 2 P.; 11Article

CONTRAST EFFECTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SUBSEQUENT BEHAVIORSHERMAN SJ; AHLM K; BERMAN L et al.1978; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 340-350; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

EFFECT OF PRIOR DIFFERENTIAL TASTE EXPERIENCE ON RETENTION OF TASTE QUALITY.FLAHERTY CF; LOMBARDI BR.1977; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 9; NO 6; PP. 391-394; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

EFFECT OF SCATTERED LIGHT ON EXTENT OF BORDER ENHANCEMENT.REMOLE A.1977; AMER. J. OPTOM. PHYSIOL. OPT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 54; NO 5; PP. 300-311; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

PERCENTAGE REINFORCEMENT AND BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST IN CHAIN SCHEDULESKENDALL SB.1982; PSYCHOL. REC.; ISSN 0033-2933; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 75-84; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

FOVEAL METACONTRAST. I: CRITERION CONTENT AND PRACTICE EFFECTSVENTURA J.1980; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERFECT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 473-485; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CONTRAST AND FREQUENCY COMPETITION FOR ORIENTATION-CONTINGENT COLOR AFTER EFFECTSSCHMIDT MJ; FINKE RA.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 5; PP. 406-412; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

INFANT PATTERN VISION: A NEW APPROACH BASED ON THE CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTIONBANKS MS; SALAPATEK P.1981; J. EXP. CHILD PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-0965; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 1-45; BIBL. 3 P.Article

PERCEPTIVE FIELD SIZES AND A NEW VERSION OF THE HERMANN GRIDBERBAUM K; CHAN SUP CHUNG.1981; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 1; PP. 85-89; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS IN VOWEL PERCEPTION. I: ANCHOR-INDUCED CONTRAST EFFECTSSAWUSCH JR; NUSBAUM HC.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 4; PP. 292-302; BIBL. 1 P.Article

CONTRAST EFFECTS IN THE RAT: A DEVELOPMENTAL STUDYFACEN JW; SHOEMAKER GE.1979; DEVELOP. PSYCHOBIOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 83-92; BIBL. 19 REF.Article