kw.\*:("CREDIBILITE INFORMATION")
Results 1 to 25 of 356
Selection :
VALUES AND INFORMATION SOURCE PREFERENCES = LES VALEURS ET LES PREFERENCES DE SOURCE D'INFORMATIONSTARCK K.1973; J. COMMUNIC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 74-85; BIBL. 23 REF.Article
CREDIBILITY OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT DRUGS TO HEROIN ADDICTS.SINNETT ER; HAGEN K; HARVEY WM et al.1976; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 37; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1239-1242; BIBL. 2 REF.Article
PARAPSYCHOLOGY AND GENESIS OF DOUBT.ROGO DS.1977; PARAPSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 8; NO 6; PP. 20-22; BIBL. 7 REF.Article
THE EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION APPREHENSION ON COMMUNICATION EFFECTIVENESS.FREIMUTH VS.1976; HUM. COMMUNIC. RES.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 289-298; BIBL. 1 P.Article
DETECTION OF TRUTHFUL AND DECEPTIVE INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS ACROSS INFORMATION TRANSMISSION MODESLITTLEPAGE GE; PINEAULT MA.1981; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-4545; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 114; NO 1; PP. 57-68; BIBL. 19 REF.Article
LEADING QUESTIONS AND THE EYEWITNESS REPORT OF A LIVE AND A DESCRIBED INCIDENT.BROWN L; HEYMANN S; PRESKILL B et al.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 3 PART. 2; PP. 1041-1042; BIBL. 4 REF.Article
REPRESSION SENSITIZATION AND PROCESSING OF FAVORABLE AND ADVERSE INFORMATION.SHAVIT H; SHOUVAL R.1977; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 4; PP. 1041-1044; BIBL. 9 REF.Article
DIARY GIVES MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION ABOUT ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION THAN QUESTIONNAIREPOIKOLAINEN K; KAERKKAEINEN P.1983; DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE; ISSN 0376-8716; CHE; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 209-216; BIBL. 8 REF.Article
EFFECTS OF THREE INTERVIEW FACTORS ON THE VALIDITY OF ALCOHOL ABUSERS' SELF-REPORTSSOBELL LC; SOBELL MB.1981; AM. J. DRUG ALCOHOL ABUSE; ISSN 0095-2990; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 225-237; BIBL. 17 REF.Article
PERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES: THE ROLE OF EXPLANATION IN THE PERSISTENCE OF DISCREDITED INFORMATIONANDERSON CA; LEPPER MR; ROSS L et al.1980; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 39; NO 6; PP. 1037-1049; BIBL. DISSEM.Article
TEACHERS' SENSITIVITY TO THE RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION IN MAKING CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS IN AN ACHIEVEMENT SITUATION.BORKO H; SHAVELSON RJ.1978; J. EDUC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 70; NO 3; PP. 271-279; BIBL. 17 REF.Article
DOES INSECURITY BREED ACCEPTANCE.: EFFECTS OF TRAIT AND SITUATIONAL INSECURITY ON ACCEPTANCE OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE DIAGNOSTIC FEEDBACK.SNYDER CR; CLAIR MS.1977; J. CONSULTG CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 5; PP. 843-850; BIBL. 36 REF.Article
THERAPEUGENIC FACTORS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY: THE EFFECTS OF FEE AND TITLE ON CREDIBILITY AND ATTRACTIONTRAUTT GM; BLOOM LJ.1982; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9762; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 274-279; BIBL. 19 REF.Article
OVERCONFIDENCE IN IGNORANT EXPERTSBRADLEY JV.1981; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 82-84; BIBL. 3 REF.Article
Eyewitness identification: retrospective self-awareness and the accuracy-confidence correlationKASSIN, S. M.Journal of personality and social psychology. 1985, Vol 49, Num 4, pp 878-893, issn 0022-3514Article
Psychophysiologische Aussagebeurteilung ― Zum Stand der wissenschaftlichen «Lügendetektion» = Analyse psychophysiologique de la déposition. La situation actuelle de la «détection de mensonge» = Psychophysiological detection of testimony. Present state of scientific «Lie detection»STELLER, M.Psychologische Beiträge (Lengerich). 1983, Vol 25, Num 3-4, pp 459-493, issn 0033-3018Article
Trustworthiness of attitudinal and behavioral expressions: a replicationJACKSON, T. T; GUYDISH, J; MINDRUP, M et al.Psychological reports. 1984, Vol 54, Num 1, pp 29-30, issn 0033-2941Article
PERFORMANCE AND PERSONALITY CORRELATES OF TEACHER'S SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BIASING INFORMATIONBABAD EY; INBAR J.1981; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 40; NO 3; PP. 553-561; BIBL. 18 REF.Article
SOCIAL ROLES AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN GILDING.GITTER AG; BLACK H; GOLDMAN R et al.1977; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 1; PP. 71-74; BIBL. 3 REF.Article
SOURCE CREDIBILITY, INFORMATION FAVORABILITY, AND JOB OFFER ACCEPTANCEFISHER CD; ILGEN DR; HOYER WD et al.1979; ACAD. MANAG. J.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 94-103; BIBL. 12 REF.Article
DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF NONSPECIFIC CONTROL GROUPS IN BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION RESEARCH.JACOBSON NS; BAUCOM DH.1977; BEHAV. THERAPY; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 8; NO 4; PP. 709-719; BIBL. 1 P.Article
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY ENHANCEMENT: A TREATMENT PACKAGE FOR INCREASING FIDELITY OF SELF-REPORT.BORNSTEIN PH; HAMILTON SB; MILLER RK et al.1977; J. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 3; PP. 861-866; BIBL. 21 REF.Article
Judging the Quality and Credibility of Information in Internet Discussion ForumsSAVOLAINEN, Reijo.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Print). 2011, Vol 62, Num 7, pp 1243-1256, issn 1532-2882, 14 p.Article
Können Befragte Lügen? Zum Konzept des «wahren Wertes» im Rahmen der handlungstheoretischen Erklärung von Situationseinflüssen bei der Befragung = Les questionnés peuvent-ils mentir? Concept de la valeur de vérité dans le cadre de l'explication des influences situationnelles sur l'enquête en fonction de la théorie de l'action = Possible deception in the subjects of an inquiry? Concept of «truthful value» in the frame of action theory explanation of situation influences during inquiryESSER, H.Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 1986, Vol 38, Num 2, pp 314-336, issn 0023-2653Article
Accuracy of children's eyewitness identifications in a field settingBRIGHAM, J. C; VAN VERST, M; BOTHWELL, R. K et al.Basic and applied social psychology. 1986, Vol 7, Num 4, pp 295-306, issn 0197-3533Article