COMPARISON OF FIELD AND LABORATORY DETERMINED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY VALUES = COMPARAISON DE VALEURS DE CONDUCTIVITE HYDRAULIQUE DETERMINEES SUR LE TERRAIN ET AU LABORATOIREDANE JH.1980; SOIL SCI. SOC. AM. J.; ISSN 0361-5995; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 228-231; BIBL. 13 REF.; 2 TAB. ; ILL./TABL.Article

COMPARISON OF FIELD AND LABORATORY DETERMINED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY VALUESDANE JH.1980; SOIL SCI. SOC. AM. J.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 228-231; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

TESTING TENSIOMETERS BY A VACUUM METHODPUCKETT WE; DANE JH.1981; SOIL SCI.; ISSN 0038-075X; USA; DA. 1981-12; VOL. 132; NO 6; PP. 444-445; ILL.Article

EFFECT OF HYSTERESIS ON THE PREDICTION OF INFILTRATION, REDISTRIBUTION AND DRAINAGE OF WATER IN A LAYERED SOIL.DANE JH; WIERENGA PJ.1975; J. HYDROL.; NLD; 1975, VOL. 25, NUM. 0003-0004, P. 229 A 242Serial Issue

AN ADAPTIVE FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL WATER FLOW EQUATIONDANE JH; MATHIS FH; STEWART BA et al.1981; SOIL SCI. SOC. AM. J.; ISSN 0361-5995; USA; DA. 1981-12; VOL. 45; NO 6; PP. 1048-1054; BIBL. 14 REF.; 4 TAB. ; ILL.Conference Paper