TEAM SIZE AND DECISION RULE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SIMULATED MONITORING TEAMS = LA DIMENSION DES EQUIPES ET LA REGLE DE DECISION DANS LA PERFORMANCE DANS DES EQUIPES DE CONTROLE SIMULEWAAG WL; HALCOMB CG.1972; HUM. FACTORS; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 309-314; BIBL. 5REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF ITEM CALIBRATION SAMPLE SIZE AND ITEM POOL SIZE ON AN ADAPTIVE TESTINGREE MH.1981; APPL. PSYCHOL. MEAS.; ISSN 0146-6216; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 11-19; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

A PROPOS D'UNE ENQUETE NATIONALE SUR LES PRATIQUES CULTURELLES DES FRANCAIS.ROMER M.1975; CAH. ANIMAT.; FR.; DA. 1975; NO 9; PP. 53-62; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ANOTHER LOOK AT GROUP SIZE, GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING, AND MEMBER CONSENSUS.MANNERS GE JR.1975; ACAD. MANAG. J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 715-724; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

ORGANIZATION SIZE AND BEHAVIOR SETTING CAPACITY AS DETERMINANTS OF MEMBER PARTICIPATION = LA TAILLE DE L'ORGANISATION ET LA POSSIBILITE DE MISE EN PLACE DU COMPORTEMENT EN TANT QUE DETERMINANTS DE LA PARTICIPATION DES MEMBRESWICKER AW; MCGRATH JE; ARMSTRONG GE et al.1972; BEHAV. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 17; NO 6; PP. 499-513; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

GROUP SIZE EFFECTS ON CONFORMITY.STANG DJ.1976; J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 98; NO 2; PP. 175-181; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

LES PUBLICS DE L'ANIMATION: LEUR CONSTITUTION.BARTHEZ JC.1975; CAH. ANIMAT.; FR.; DA. 1975; NO 9; PP. 3-19; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SOME CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE CHOICE TO COOPERATE OR COMPETE.SCHMITT DR.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 165-178; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

INDIVIDUAL VERSUS TETRADIC PERFORMANCE ON A COMPLEMENTARY TASK AS A FUNCTION OF INITIAL ABILITY LEVEL = PERFORMANCE INDIVIDUELLE OU A 3 DANS UNE TACHE DE COMPLEMENTARITE EN FONCTION DU NIVEAU D'APTITUDE INITIALELAUGHLIN PR; BRANCH LG.1972; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 201-216; BIBL. 9REF.Article

THE DECISION PROCESSES OF 6- AND 12-PERSON MOCK JURIES ASSIGNED UNANIMOUS AND TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY RULES.DAVIS JH; KERR NL; ATKIN RS et al.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 1-14; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE EXERCISE OF EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIPBLAKE RR; MOUTON JS.1981; JELS, J. EXP. LEARN. SIMUL.; ISSN 0162-6574; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 3; NO 1; PP. 3-16; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF SEX, CONVERSATION, LOCATION, AND SIZE OF OBSERVER GROUP ON BYSTANDER INTERVENTION IN A HIGH RISK SITUATIONHOWARD W; CRANO WD.1974; SOCIOMETRY; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 37; NO 4; PP. 491-507; BIBL. 2P.Article

SMALL SAMPLE PROFILE ANALYSIS WITH MANY VARIABLESMAXWELL SE; ARVEY RD.1982; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 92; NO 3; PP. 778-785; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN VARIATE VALUES AND RANKS IN SMALL SIZE SAMPLESO'BRIEN RM.1982; BR. J. MATH. STAT. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0007-1102; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 106-112; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A MODEL FOR COMPUTING THE SIZE OF A THERAPY GROUPSWEET AL.1981; IEEE TRANS. SYST. MAN CYBERN.; ISSN 0018-9472; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 160-167; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

POWER OF THE MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TESTSSTEUENS JP.1980; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 88; NO 3; PP. 728-737; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

LARGE GROUP BARGAINING IN A CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION GAMEMURNIGHAN JK; ROTH AE.1978; J. CONFLICT RESOLUT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 299-317; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

BOYS AND GIRLS TOGETHER: SEXUAL COMPOSITION AND THE EFFECT OF DENSITY AND GROUP SIZE ON COHESIVENESS.MARSHALL JE; HESLIN R.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 5; PP. 952-961; BIBL. 41 REF.Article

LARGE-SCALE SOCIAL SURVEYS: PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTSFIENBERG SE; TANUR JM.1983; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; ISSN 0005-7940; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 28; NO 2; PP. 135-153; BIBL. 3 P.Article

AUTHORITY IN SMALL GROUPS: A LABORATORY TEST OF A MACHIAVELLIAN OBSERVATIONSPILLANE R.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 51-59; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT GROUPSPILISUK M; PARKS SH.1980; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 106; NO 2; PP. 157-177; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

IMPLICATIONS OF DEVELOPMENTAL THEORIES FOR COUNSELING ADOLESCENTS IN GROUPSBALL JD; MECK DS.1979; ADOLESCENCE; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 14; NO 55; PP. 529-534; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

PERCEIVED LEADERSHIP RANKINGS OF MALES AND FEMALES IN SMALL TASK GROUPSTINDALL JH; BOYLER L; CLINE P et al.1978; J. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 100; NO 1; PP. 13-20; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE CREATIVE PRODUCTION OF THE GROUP: EFFETS OF SMALL GROUP STRUCTUREGLOVER JA; CHAMBERS T.1978; SMALL GROUP BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 387-392; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

MINORITY INFLUENCE: EFFECTS OF SIZE, CONVERSION, AND SEXARBUTHNOT J; WAYNER M.1982; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 111; PP. 285-295; BIBL. 14 REF.Article