LOW-FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN THE DETECTION OF GRATINGS: SORTING OUT THE ARTEFACTSESTEVEZ O; CAVONIUS.1976; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 5; PP. 497-500; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

EVIDENCE AGAINST NARROW-BAND SPATIAL FREQUENCY CHANNELS IN HUMAN VISION: THE DETECTABILITY OF FREQUENCY MODULATED GRATINGS. = PREUVE CONTRE DES CANAUX DE FREQUENCE SPATIALE A BANDE ETROITE DANS LA VISION HUMAINE: DISCRIMINATION DE RESEAUX A FREQUENCE MODULEESTROMEYER CF III; KLEIN S.1975; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 15; NO 8-9; PP. 899-910; H.T. 1; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

EFFECT OF SPATIAL FREQUENCY ON THE VISIBILITY OF UNSTRUCTURED PATTERNSMITCHELL OR.1976; J. OPT. SOC. AMER.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 327-332; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE INTERACTION OF DICHOPTICALLY PRESENTED SPATIAL GRATINGS = L'INTERACTION DE GRILLES SPATIALES PRESENTEES DICHOPTIQUEMENTBACON JH.1976; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 337-344; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

PATTERN DETECTION AND THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL FOURIER TRANSFORM: CIRCULAR TARGETS. = TYPE DE DETECTION VISUELLE ET LES TRANSFORMEES A DEUX DIMENSIONS DE FOURIER: CIBLES CIRCULAIRESKELLY DH; MAGNUSKI HS.1975; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 15; NO 8-9; PP. 911-915; H.T. 2; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE INDEPENDENCE OF CHANNELS IN HUMAN VISION SELECTIVE FOR DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT.LEVINSON E; SEKULER R.1975; J. PHYSIOL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 250; NO 2; PP. 347-366; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

ADAPTING TO TWO ORIENTATIONS: DISINHIBITION IN A VISUAL AFTEREFFECTMAGNUSSEN S; KURTENBACH W.1980; SCIENCE; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 207; NO 4433; PP. 908-909; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

ON THE CAPACITY OF DIRECTIONALLY SELECTIVE MECHANISMS TO ENCODE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS OF MOVING STIMULIPANTLE A; LEHMKUHLE S; CAUDILL M et al.1978; PERCEPTION; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 261-267; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

EVIDENCE FOR DIRECTIONAL SCANNING WITH THE ORDER-OF-REPORT FACTOR EXCLUDED.KRUEGER LE.1976; CANAD. J. PSYCHOL.; CANADA; DA. 1976; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 9-14; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

ESTABLISHMENT AND DECAY OF ORIENTATION-CONTINGENT AFTEREFFECTS OF COLORRIGGS LA; WHITE KD; EIMAS PD et al.1974; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 535-542; BIBL. 29REF.Article

INHIBITORY BINOCULAR INTERACTION IN HUMAN VISION AND A POSSIBLE MECHANISM SUBSERVING STEREOSCOPIC FUSIONRUDDOCK KH; WIGLEY E.1976; NATURE; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 260; NO 5552; PP. 604-606; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

OSSERVAZIONI SULLA PERCEZIONE CUTANEA DEGLI STIMOLI TATTILI FIGURATI NELL' UOMO IN CONDIZIONI NORMALI. = OBSERVATIONS SUR LA PERCEPTION CUTANEE DES STIMULI TACTILES FIGURES CHEZ L'HOMME DANS DES CONDITIONS NORMALESCAFFARRA P; MAZZUCCHI A; PARMA M et al.1976; BOLL. SOC. ITAL. BIOL. SPER.; ITAL.; DA. 1976 PARU 1977; VOL. 52; NO 24; PP. 2092-2096; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

CHILDREN'S ORIENTATION JUDGMENTS: RETINALLY OR ENVIRON MENTALLY DETERMINEDBRAINE LG; KNOX C.1975; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 5; PP. 473-479; BIBL. 24REFArticle

EFFECT OF MEAN REACTION TIME ON SACCADIC RESPONSES TO TWO-STEP STIMULI WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COMPONENTS. = ACTION DU TEMPS DE REACTION SUR LES REPONSES DES MOUVEMENTS OCULAIRES EN SACCADE A DES STIMULI A DEUX PALIERS HORIZONTAUX ET VERTICAUXLISBERGER SG; FUCHS AF; KING WM et al.1975; VISION RES.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 15; NO 8-9; PP. 1021-1025; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

LIGHT PATH AND PHOTON CAPTURE IN TURTLE PHOTORECEPTORSBAYLOR DA; FETTIPLACE R.1975; J. PHYSIOL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 248; NO 2; PP. 433-464; H.T. 4; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

THE EFFECT OF INDUCING-LINE LENGTH ON THE MAGNITUDES OF THE TILT ILLUSION AND AFTEREFFECTWENDEROTH P; O'TOOLE B; CURTHOYS I et al.1975; AUSTRAL. J. PSYCHOL.; AUSTRAL.; DA. 1975; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 1-7; BIBL. 11REFArticle

DISCRIMINATION OF MIRROR IMAGE STIMULI IN CHILDRENAARON PG; MALATESIA RN.1974; NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA; ALLEM.; DA. 1974; VOL. 12; NO 4; PP. 549-551; ABS. FR. ALLEM.; BIBL. 4REF.Article

PATTERN ALTERNATION: EFFECTS OF SPATIAL FREQUENCY AND ORIENTATIONKITTERLE FL; KAYE RS; NIXON H et al.1974; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 543-546; BIBL. 8REF.Article

THE TIME REQUIRED TO COMPARE EXTENTS IN VARIOUS ORIENTATIONSATTNEAVE F; BLOCK G.1974; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 431-436; BIBL. 9REF.Article

DISPLACEMENT LIMITS, DIRECTIONAL ANISOTROPY AND DIRECTION VERSUS FORM DISCRIMINATION IN RANDOM-DOT CINEMATOGRAMSCHANG JJ; JULESZ B.1983; VISION RESEARCH (OXFORD); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 23; NO 6; PP. 639-646; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

DISCRIMINATION OF ORIENTATION BY HUMAN INFANTSESSOCK EA; SIQUELAND ER.1981; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 3; PP. 245-253; BIBL. 2 P.Article

A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIRECTION-SPECIFIC ADAPTATIONLEVINSON E; SEKULER R.1980; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 20; NO 2; PP. 103-107; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

EXPLORING AZIMUTH EFFECTS WITH AN ANTHROPOMETRIC MANIKINDIRKS DD; GILMAN S.1979; J. ACOUST. SOC. AMER.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 66; NO 3; PP. 696-701; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

TWO KINDS OF ADAPTATION IN THE CONSTANCY OF VISUAL DIRECTION.WALLACH H; CANAL T.1976; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 19; NO 5; PP. 445-449; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

INTENSITY AND REVERBERATION AS FACTORS IN THE AUDITORY PERCEPTION OF EGOCENTRIC DISTANCE.MERSHON DH; KING LE.1975; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 18; NO 6; PP. 409-415; BIBL. 21 REF.Article