DISSONANCE AWARENESS. A TEST OF DISSONANCE THEORY VERSUS SELF-PERCEPTION THEORY = LA DISSONANCE COGNITIVE. UN TEST DE LA THEORIE DE LA DISSONANCE OPPOSEE A LA THEORIE DE L'AUTOEVALUATIONSNYDER M; EBBESEN EB.1972; J. EXPER. SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 8; NO 6; PP. 502-517; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

SOME INTEGRATION EFFECTS OF CERTAIN IRRATIONAL BEHAVIORS = QUELQUES EFFETS D'INTEGRATION DE CERTAINS COMPORTEMENTS IRRATIONNELSBREHM JW; HAYDU GG.1972; ANN. NEW YORK ACAD. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; NO 193; PP. 189-307 (28P.); BIBL. 17REF.Article

IMMEDIATE RECALL OF CONSISTENT AND INCONSISTENT SELF-RELATED MATERIAL = LE RAPPEL IMMEDIAT DU MATERIEL CONCORDANT OU DISCORDANT AVEC LES EVALUATIONS PERSONNELLESKUO SHU YANG.1972; ACTA PSYCHOL. TAIWAN.; FORMOSE; DA. 1972; VOL. 14; PP. 92-99; BIBL. 8REF.Article

SELF-PERCEPTION, DISSONANCE, AND PREMANIPULATION ATTITUDES = AUTOEVALUATION, DISSONANCE ET ATTITUDES PREMANIPULATIONWOODYARD HD.1972; PSYCHON. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 29; NO 4A; PP. 193-196; BIBL. 19REF.Article

MISATTRIBUTION OF AROUSAL AS A MEANS OF DISSONANCE REDUCTION.DRACHMAN D; WORCHEL S.1976; SOCIOMETRY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 53-59; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

DETAILED TEST OF THE REINFORCEMENT-DISSONANCE CONTROVERSY IN THE COUNTERATTITUDINAL ADVOCACY SITUATION = VERIFICATION DETAILLEE DE LA CONTROVERSE ENTRE LE RENFORCEMENT ET LA DISSONANCE DANS LA SITUATION DE PERSUASION EN VUE DU CHANGEMENT D'ATTITUDEHESLIN R; AMO MF.1972; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 234-242; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

SALARY EQUITY: ITS DETERMINATION, ANALYSIS, AND CORRELATES = L'EQUITE DES SALAIRES: SA DETERMINATION, ANALYSE ET CORRELATSFINN RH; LEE SM.1972; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 56; NO 4; PP. 283-292; BIBL. 11REF.Article

ATTITUDE CHANGE AND ATTITUDE ATTRIBUTION: EFFECTS OF INCENTIVE, CHOICE, AND CONSEQUENCES = CHANGEMENT D'ATTITUDE ET ATTRIBUTION D'ATTITUDE: LES EFFETS DE L'INCITATION, DU CHOIX ET CONSEQUENCESCALDER BJ; ROSS M; INSKO CA et al.1973; J. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 25; NO 1; PP. 84-99; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF FORCED NONCOMPLIANCE = CONSEQUENCES COGNITIVES DU NONCONFORMISME FORCEDARLEY SA; COOPER J.1972; J. PERSONNALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 24; NO 3; PP. 321-326; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGIE SOCIALE THEORIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE. RECUEIL DE TEXTES CHOISIS ET PRESENTESFAUCHEUX C; MOSCOVICI S.1971; PARIS; MOUTON; DA. 1971; PP. 1-394; BIBL. DISSEM.; (TEXTES SOCIOL. 8)Book Chapter

WIDTH OF THE LATITUDE OF ACCEPTANCE AS A DETERMINANT OF ATTITUDE CHANGE = L'IMPORTANCE DE LA LATITUDE DE L'ACCEPTATION EN TANT QUE DETERMINANT DU CHANGEMENT D'ATTITUDEEAGLY AH; TELAAK K.sdJ. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 197; VOL. 23; NO 3; PP. 388-397; BIBL. 20REF.Article

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUDE CHANGE FOLLOWING TWO ACTS OF FORCED COMPLIANCE = DIFFERENCES INDIVIDUELLES DANS LE CHANGEMENT D'ATTITUDE A LA SUITE DE 2 ACTES DE SOUMISSION FORCEETOUHEY JC.1973; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 96-99; BIBL. 13REF.Article

BELIEF INSTABILITY AS A MEDIATING VARIABLE IN OPINION CHANGE: THE EFFECTS OF ATTACK DISCREPANCY = L'INSTABILITE DE LA CROYANCE COMME VARIABLE MEDIATRICE DANS LE CHANGEMENT D'OPINION: LES EFFETS DES CONTRADICTIONS DES CONTRE-ARGUMENTSKOSLIN BL; SUEFELD P; PARGAMENT R et al.1973; BRIT. J. SOC. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1973; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 18-33; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

INTERPERSONAL SIMULATION OF AN ATTRIBUTION EXPERIMENT = LA STIMULATION INTERPERSONNELLE DANS UNE EXPERIENCE SUR L'ATTRIBUTIONWEINER MJ; HOOPER SC.1972; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 310; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

SELECTIVE EXPOSURE IN A FIELD SETTING = L'OUVERTURE SELECTIVE A L'INFORMATION DANS UN CADRE NON EXPERIMENTALLA VOIE AL; THOMPSON SK.1972; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 433-434; BIBL. 4REF.Article

STUDIES IN FORCED COMPLIANCE: CONFLUENCE OF CHOICE AND CONSEQUENCE ON ATTITUDE CHANGE = EXPERIENCES CONCERNANT LA CONFORMITE FORCEE: LA CONGRUENCE DU CHOIX ET SA CONSEQUENCE SUR LE CHANGEMENT D'ATTITUDEHOYT MF; HENLEY MD; COLLINS BE et al.1972; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 205-210; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

AN INTERPERSONAL SIMULATION OF THE JECKER CONFLICT EXPERIMENT: A TEST OF BEM'S THEORY = UNE SIMULATION INTERPERSONNELLE DE L'EXPERIENCE CONCERNANT LE CONFLIT DE JECKER: UN TEST DE LA THEORIE DE BEMWOODYARD HD.1972; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 82; NO 2; PP. 201-207; BIBL. 5REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF POSTDECISIONAL REGRET ON SELECTIVE EXPOSURE.MILLER RL.1977; EUROP. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; NETHERL.; DA. 1977; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 121-127; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SELF-ATTRIBUTED CHOICE AS A FUNCTION OF THE CONSEQUENCE OF A DECISION.HARRIS B; HARVEY JH.1975; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 6; PP. 1013-1019; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

A BALANCE THEORY INTERPRETATIONS OF DISSONANCEINSKO CA; WORCHEL S; FOLGER R et al.1975; PSYCHOL. REV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 82; NO 3; PP. 169-183; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

DIFFICULTIES IN REPLICATING THE PROSELYTING EFFECT IN DOOMS-DAY GROUPSTHOMPSON KS; OSKAMP S.1974; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 35; NO 2; PP. 971-978; BIBL. 17REF.Article

SELF-PERCEPTION AND COMMITMENT TO ATTITUDES EXISTING PRIOR TO MANIPULATIONWOODYARD HD; CHRIS SA.1974; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 35; NO 1; PP. 217-218; BIBL. 3REF.Article

PROXIMITY AND SIMILARITY AS DETERMINANTS OF IMPRESSION CHANGE.ALIMARAS PE.1976; J. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 92; NO 2; PP. 205-213; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

REDUCING STRESS BY COUNTER-ATTITUDINAL ADVOCACYHOUSTON BK; WARNER MO.1974; J. RES. PERSONALITY; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 8; NO 4; PP. 350-360; BIBL. 1P.Article

PERSONALITY AND SITUATIONAL FACTORS IN THE PROCESS OF INFERRING ATTITUDES FROM BEHAVIOR = FACTEURS DE LA PERSONNALITE ET DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT DANS LE PROCESSUS D'INTERPRETATION DES ATTITUDES A PARTIR DU COMPORTEMENTZUCKERMAN M.1972; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 31; NO 1; PP. 283-289; BIBL. 9REF.Article