A SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORETIC APPROACH TO SEX DISCRIMINATION IN FACULTY SALARIESROOSE JE; DOHERTY ME.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 193-215; BIBL. 2 P.Article

JUDGEMENT THEORY APPLIED TO THE SELECTION OF LIFE INSURANCE SALESMEN.ROOSE JE; DOHERTY ME.1976; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 16; NO 2; PP. 231-249; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

STIMULUS DIMENSIONALITY AND TEMPORAL REPETITION = DIMENSION DU STIMULUS ET REPETITION TEMPORELLEDOHERTY ME; KEELEY SM.1973; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1973; VOL. 13; NO 1A; PP. 60-64; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY AND ACADEMIC ADVISEMENTJOHNSON WR; DOHERTY ME.1983; JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0022-0167; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 30; NO 2; PP. 271-274; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

FEEDBACK EFFECTS IN A METRIC MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING TASK.HOLZWORTH RJ; DOHERTY ME.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 8; NO 1; PP. 1-3; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

VISUAL MASKING BY LIGTH OFFSET: AN EXPERIMENT IN REPLY TO HOGBEN AND DILOLLO = MASQUAGE VISUEL PAR L'EXTINCTION LUMINEUSE: UNE EXPERIENCE EN REPONSE A HOGBEN ET DILOLLOHOLZWORTH RJ; DOHERTY ME.1974; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 103; NO 4; PP. 815-816; BIBL. 6REF.Article

ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF REPEATEDLY PRESENTED BRIEF VISUAL STIMULI = L'IDENTIFICATION DE STIMULI VISUELS BREFS PRESENTES SUCCESSIVEMENTDOHERTY ME; KEELEY SM.1972; PSYCHOL. BULL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 78; NO 2; PP. 142-154; BIBL. 1P.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF TASK CHARACTERISTICS ON STRATEGIES OF CUE COMBINATIONMERTZ WH; DOHERTY ME.1974; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 12; NO 2; PP. 196-216; BIBL. 1P.1/2Article

CAN WE LEARN ANYTHING ABOUT INTERVIEWING REAL PEOPLE FROM "INTERVIEWS" OF PAPER PEOPLE. TWO STUDIES OF THE EXTERNAL VALIDITY OF A PARADIGMGORMAN CD; CLOVER WH; DOHERTY ME et al.1978; ORGANIZ. BEHAV. HUM. PERFORM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 165-192; BIBL. 2 P.Article

CONSEQUENCES OF CONFIRMATION AND DISCONFIRMATION IN A SIMULATED RESEARCH ENVIRONMENTMYNATT CR; DOHERTY ME; TWENEY RD et al.1978; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 30; NO 3; PP. 395-406; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ASSESSING DISCRIMINATION: AN APPLICATION OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT TECHNOLOGYMANISCALCO CI; DOHERTY ME; ULLMAN DG et al.1980; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 65; NO 3; PP. 284-288; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF NEGATION AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON ILLUSORY CORRELATIONMOWREY JD; DOHERTY ME; KEELEY SM et al.1979; J. ABNORM. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 88; NO 3; PP. 334-337; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

PSEUDODIAGNOSTICITYDOHERTY ME; MYNATT CR; TWENEY RD et al.1979; ACTA PSYCHOL.; NLD; DA. 1979; VOL. 43; NO 2; PP. 111-121; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF FEEDBACK AND DIAGNOSTIC DATA ON PSEUDODIAGNOSTICITYDOHERTY ME; SCHIAVO MB; TWENEY RD et al.1981; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 191-194; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

THE MANY FACES OF HYPERACTIVITY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN DIAGNOSTIC POLICIESULLMAN DG; EGAN D; FIEDLER N et al.1981; J. CONSULT. CLIN. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-006X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 49; NO 5; PP. 694-704; BIBL. 26 REF.Article

STRATEGIES OF RULE DISCOVERY IN AN INFERENCE TASKTWENEY RD; DOHERTY ME; WORNER WJ et al.1980; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 32; NO 1; PP. 109-123; BIBL. 28 REF.Article