NOTE ON THE KAUFMAN AND JOHNSON STUDIES OF THE DIFFERENTIAL VALIDITIES OF PEER NOMINATION TECHNIQUESDOWNEY RG.1975; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 60; NO 2; PP. 245-246; BIBL. 5REFArticle

ARE WOMEN PEERS.MOHR ES; DOWNEY RG.1977; J. OCCUP. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 50; NO 1; PP. 53-57; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

RATING THE RATINGS: ASSESSING THE PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITY OF RATING DATASAAL FE; DOWNEY RG; LAHEY MA et al.1980; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 413-428; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EVALUATION OF A PEER RATING SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING SUBSEQUENT PROMOTION OF SENIOR MILITARY OFFICERS.DOWNEY RG; MEDLAND FF; YATES LG et al.1976; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 61; NO 2; PP. 206-209; BIBL. 13 REF.Article